What Do Gen Z Students Need to Succeed in Reading Comprehension?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i2.26908Keywords:
undergraduate studentsAbstract
The development of tailored educational content is essential for meeting the diverse needs of students, particularly in the context of English language education. This study aimed to identify the specific reading requirements of first-year undergraduate students majoring in English language education, focusing on Generation Z, characterized by their digital nativeness and unique learning preferences. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the research involved 56 Gen Z students at Mahasaraswati Denpasar University who participated in surveys and semi-structured interviews. The findings revealed a significant preference for intensive reading activities driven by challenges with unfamiliar vocabulary. Additionally, students emphasized the need to improve both vocabulary mastery and reading comprehension skills. The study also identified critical procedural, setting, and role-related needs influencing the learning process. These results underscore the importance of integrating Gen Z students' target and learning needs into the design of reading courses. Consequently, English teachers are encouraged to adapt their instructional strategies based on a comprehensive needs analysis to support their students' learning objectives effectively.
References
Andoko, B. S., Hayashi, Y., Hirashima, T., & Asri, A. N. (2020). Improving English reading for EFL readers by reviewing kit-build concept maps. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-020-00126-8
Astanina, A., & Kuznetsov, I. (2020). Linguistic imperialism in EFL teaching: New role of a teacher in educating generation z. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Philosophy of Education, Law and Science in the Era of Globalization (PELSEG 2020). International Scientific Conference on Philosophy of Education, Law and Science in the Era of Globalization (PELSEG 2020), Ekaterinburg, Russia. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200723.004
Bilonozhko, N., & Syzenko, A. (2020). Effective reading strategies for Generation Z using authentic texts. Arab World English Journal, 2, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/elt2.8
Buzzetto-Hollywood, N. A., Elobeid, M., & Elobaid, M. E. (2018). Addressing information literacy and the digital divide in higher education. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 14, 077-093. https://doi.org/10.28945/4029
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching pronunciation hardback with audio CDs (2): A course book and reference guide. Cambridge University Press.
Chang, C. K., & Hsu, C. K. (2011). A mobile-assisted synchronously collaborative translation–annotation system for English as a foreign language (EFL) reading comprehension. Computer assisted language learning, 24(2), 155-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.536952
Chen, R. (2023). Generation Z students' characteristics and attitudes in a Chinese English language teaching classroom. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 2(1), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2/2022458
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
DiCicco‐Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical education, 40(4), 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research‐based approach. TESOL quarterly, 39(3), 379-397. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486
Dong, Y., Tang, Y., Chow, B. W.-Y., Wang, W., & Dong, W.-Y. (2020). Contribution of vocabulary knowledge to reading comprehension among Chinese students: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 525369. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.525369
Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33(2), 209-224.
Fu, S. (2021). The roles of intensive and extensive reading activities in Chinese EFL university students’ reading comprehension skills. Education and Linguistics Research, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5296/elr.v8i1.19189
Folse, K. S. (2004). Myths about teaching and learning second language vocabulary: What recent research says. TESL reporter, 37, 13-13. http://lir.byuh.edu/index.php/Issue1/article/download/1256/1208
George, S. (2023). Five pillars of reading. SSRN Electronic Journal, 3(9), 6. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4576276
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. (2002). Teaching and research reading. Harlow, UK: Longman.
Ha, H. T. (2021). Exploring the relationships between various dimensions of receptive vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading comprehension. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00131-8
Ha Le, V. (2021). Common difficulties of reading comprehension experienced by Vietnamese students. 2021 5th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (ICEMT), 306–310. https://doi.org/10.1145/3481056.3481073
Huss, J. (2023). Gen z students are filling our online classrooms: Do our teaching methods need a reboot? InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 18, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.46504/18202306hu
Indrianti, T. (2019). Reading aloud activity in ESP class in the perspectives of students. Journal Polingua: Scientific Journal of Linguistic Literatura and Education, 7(2), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.30630/polingua.v7i2.71
Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of research in education, 32(1), 241-267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07310586Kaweera, C., Yawiloeng, R., & Tachom, K. (2019). Individual, pair and group writing activity: A case study of undergraduate EFL student writing. English Language Teaching, 12(10), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n10p1
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational researcher, 38(5), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational technology research and development, 48(4), 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge university press.
Lampi, J. P., Armstrong, S. L., Talwar, A., & Magliano, J. P. (2023). Reading matters in supporting students: The role of complex literacy tasks in academic success. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 15210251231214557. https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251231214557
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2001). Teaching grammar. Teaching English as a second or foreign language/Heinle & Heinle.
Lin, Y. H., Chen, M. R. A., & Hsu, H. L. (2021). Fostering low english proficiency learners’ reading in a freshman EFL reading class: effect of using electronic and print textbooks on Taiwanese University students’ reading comprehension. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(1), 54-67. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:228972097
Laufer, B., & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension.
Maqbulin, A. (2022). The effectiveness of reading aloud to improve students reading ability in secondary school. Inovasi-Jurnal Diklat Keagamaan, 16(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.52048/inovasi.v16i2.349
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Third edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2020). Intensive Reading. In I. S. P. Nation & J. Macalister, Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing (2nd ed., pp. 30–54). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003002765-3
Niculescu, B.-O., & Dragomir, I.-A. (2023). Critical reading: A fundamental skill for building 21st century literacy. International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION, 29(2), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.2478/kbo-2023-0060
Rasinski, T. (2003). Parental involvement: Key to leaving no child behind in reading. New England Reading Association Journal, 39(3), 1. https://search.proquest.com/openview/aa009b840584e65db769a25602a91d01/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=34991
Roy, N., Torre, M. V., Gadiraju, U., Maxwell, D., & Hauff, C. (2021). Note the highlight: Incorporating active reading tools in a search as a learning environment. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406522.3446025
Salkind, N. J. (Ed.). (2010). Encyclopedia of research design (Vol. 1). sage.
Saxena, M., & Mishra, D. K. (2021). Gamification and gen z in higher education: A systematic review of literature. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 17(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.20211001.oa10
Su, Y. (2023). Delving into EFL teachers’ digital literacy and professional identity in the pandemic era: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework. Heliyon, 9(6), e16361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16361
Soller, A. (2001). Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. International journal of artificial intelligence in education, 12, 40-62.
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language learning, 52(1), 119-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179
Trinidad Trujillo Castro, M., Rua Cortes, M., Alberto Álvarez Guayara, H., & Aguilar-Cruz, P. J. (2021). Class discussions based on cultural aspects to foster the speaking skill among high school students. Astraea, 2(2), 10–38. https://doi.org/10.34142/astraea.2021.2.2.01
Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today's super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy--and completely unprepared for adulthood--and what that means for the rest of us. Simon and Schuster.
Prensky, M. (2001). Nativos digitales, inmigrantes digitales. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-7.
Widyastuti, S. (2023). Subtle othering in EFL group work. Diksi, 31(2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v31i2.65438
Wright, K. B. (2005). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 10(3), JCMC1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x
Wu, S., Liu, D., & Li, Z. (2024). Consolidating EFL content and vocabulary learning via interactive reading. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 62(2), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0228
Zayed, J. (2021). Think-aloud strategy: Improving reading comprehension in an online context. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.91.1.12
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 I Gde Putu Agus Pramerta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the VELES Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
VELES Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
