Students’ Attitudes and Learning Preferences: A Need Analysis for CLIL Materials in EFL Primary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v9i1.29291Keywords:
students, language, behavior, thinking, intensity, intercultural, communicationAbstract
A thorough need analysis (NA) is essential for designing effective instructional materials, particularly in the context of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) primary school students. Despite the increasing demand for ready-to-use CLIL materials, little research has explored the specific needs of students in this context. This study employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach, focusing on the NA phase to gather insights into students’ attitudes and material preferences for CLIL instruction. A total of 93 EFL primary school students participated in the study, with data collected via an online questionnaire that addressed two key aspects: students' attitudes toward learning English and their needs for learning materials through the CLIL approach. The data were analyzed using basic statistical methods in JASP software. The results indicated that while students generally hold a positive attitude toward learning English—particularly regarding its importance, their intention to continue learning, and intrinsic motivation—they do not consider English their preferred subject, and their interest in CLIL-related activities remains moderate. Regarding material needs, students preferred interactive and engaging methods, particularly through multimedia resources, group work, and technology integration. They also prioritized improving listening and vocabulary skills. Additionally, students showed strong interest in topics related to personal experiences and global issues, such as leisure activities, nature, and sports, while displaying less enthusiasm for academic subjects like geography and literature. These findings offer helpful input for developing digital CLIL materials better aligned with young learners’ interests and learning preferences.
References
Adijaya, N. M. A. (2023). Implementing Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in teaching English for guiding. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v6i1.59570
Adeoye, N. M. A., Wirawan, N. K. a. S. I., Pradnyani, N. M. S. S., & Septiarini, N. N. I. (2024). Revolutionising education: Unleashing the power of the ADDIE model for Effective teaching and learning. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 13(1), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i1.68624
Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(6).
Almulla, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702
Anggeraini, Y. (2018). Interactive teaching: Activities and the use of technology in EFL classroom. Language Circle Journal of Language and Literature, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v13i1.11131
Ball, P., Kelly, K., & Clegg, J. (2015). Putting CLIL into practice. Oxford University Press.
Bergman, D. (2013). Blending language learning with science: With purposeful planning, teachers can reach all students with the dual goals of language development and scientific inquiry. The Science Teacher, 80(4), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst13_080_04_46
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Bucholtz, M. (2021). Community-centred collaboration in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 42(6), 1153–1161. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab064
Castellano-Risco, I., Alejo-González, R., & Piquer-Píriz, A. M. (2020). The development of receptive vocabulary in CLIL vs EFL: Is the learning context the main variable? System, 91, 102263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102263
Coyle, D. (2006). ‘Towards strategic classrooms: Learning communities which nurture the development of learner strategies’. Language Learning Journal, 31(1): 65-79.
Coyle, D. (2008). ‘CLIL – a pedagogical approach’. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl & N. Hornberger (Eds), Encyclopedia of language and education. Springer.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
Dalton-Puffer, C., Hüttner, J. & Smit, U. (2021). 6 From voluntary to obligatory CLIL in upper secondary technical colleges: Teacher and student voices from a diverse landscape. In K. Talbot, M. Gruber & R. Nishida (Ed.), The psychological experience of integrating content and language (pp. 93-111). Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788924306-011
Deswila, N., Kustati, M., Besral, B., & Sukandi, S. S. (2020). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approach across curriculum in science classrooms: Are the English language use and learning reveal? Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 1(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v1i1.4
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2014). CLIL and motivation: the effect of individual and contextual variables. Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.889508
Ellis, G., & Brewster, J. (2014). Tell it again! The storytelling handbook for primary English language teachers. British Council.
Elyas, T., & Al-Bogami, B. (2019). The role of the iPad as instructional tool in optimizing young learners’ achievement in EFL classes in the Saudi context. Arab World English Journal, 1(1), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/elt1.11
Gabillon, Z. H., & Ailincai, R. (2013). CLIL: A science lesson with breakthrough level young EFL learners. Education, 3(3), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.edu.20130303.05
Garton, S. (2014). Unresolved issues and new challenges in teaching English to young learners: The case of South Korea. Current Issues in Language Planning, 15(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2014.858657
Getie, A. S. (2020). Factors affecting the attitudes of students towards learning English as a foreign language. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2020.1738184
Hawanti, S. (2014). Implementing Indonesia’s English language teaching policy in primary schools: The role of teachers’ knowledge and beliefs. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 9(2), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/18334105.2014.11082029
Hidayat, L. E., Basthomi, Y., & Afrilyasanti, R. (2024). Exploring secondary school teachers’ creativity in differentiated instruction (DI) practices across Indonesian EFL classrooms. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 53, 101620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101620
Hussain, S. S. (2022). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in ELT as a link between language learning and content development. Arab World English Journal, 13(2), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no2.26
Ironsi, C. S. (2023). Investigating the use of virtual reality to improve speaking skills: insights from students and teachers. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00272-8
Işık, A. (2021). How effective is the assessment component of a customized CLIL program? Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 13(2), 241–287. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2020.13.2.5
Iskandar, I. (2015). Teachers’ attitudes towards the implementation of the National Standards in School-Based EFL curriculum in South Sulawesi Primary Schools in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language, Education and Innovation 2015, 35-49.
Kadir, Z. B. A., Abdullah, R. a. B., Palpanadan, S., Abidin, S. S. B. Z., Muhammad, S. S. B., & Mohamed, A. a. B. (2020). Investigating students’ attitude and motivation in learning English as a second language among four higher institutions in Malaysia. PAROLE Journal of Linguistics and Education, 10(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.14710/parole.v10i1.72-79
Kanoksilapatham, B., & Khamkhien, A. (2022). CLIL implemented and scaffolded in an EFL higher education context: Engineering research methodology course. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 502–514. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i3.36913
Kholis, A., & Azmi, U. (2023). A need analysis on developing English interactive multimodal e-book oriented to 21st century skills. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 5(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v5i1.11804
Kumar, T., Akhter, S., Yunus, M. M., & Shamsy, A. (2022). Use of music and songs as pedagogical tools in teaching English as foreign language contexts. Education Research International, 2022, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3384067
Kurniasih, E. (2016). Teaching the four language skills in primary EFL classroom. Journal of English Teaching, 1(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v1i1.53
Lasagabaster, D. (2010). English achievement and student motivation in CLIL and EFL settings. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2010.519030
Latifah, N., Fahrurrozi, S, Z. M., Sumantri, M. S., & Setiawan, B. (2023). Elementary school teachers’ perceptions of Indonesian Elementary school textbooks: a case study. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i1.5782
Liando, N. V. F., Dallyono, R., Tatipang, D. P., & Lengkoan, F. (2023). Among English, Indonesian and local language: Translanguaging practices in an Indonesian EFL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i1.58270
Mahmud, Y. (2020). Conceptualizing bilingual education programs through CLIL and genre-based approach: An Indonesian context. Voices of English Language Education Society, 4(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v4i1.2005
Malaikosa, C. A., & Sahayu, W. (2018). Teachers’ challenges on implementing EFL curriculum in Indonesian rural area. Journal of Foreign Language Education and Technology, 4(1).
Massler, U., Stotz, D., & Queisser, C. (2014). Assessment instruments for primary CLIL: The conceptualisation and evaluation of test tasks. Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.891371
Mehisto, P. (2012). Criteria for producing CLIL learning material. Encuentro: Revista De Investigación E Innovación En La Clase De Idiomas, 21, 15–33.
Meşe, E., & Mede, E. (2022). Using digital differentiation to improve EFL achievement and self-regulation of tertiary learners: the Turkish context. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2043872
Meyer, O. (2010). Introducing the CLIL-pyramid: Key strategies and principles for quality CLIL planning and teaching. Basic issues in EFL-teaching and learning, 11-29.
Mukadimah, H., & Sahayu, W. (2021). Embedding Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) into English for specific purposes curriculum for vocational high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 11(2), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v11i2.41065
Nikula, T., Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A. & Lorenzo, F. (2016). More than content and language: The complexity of integration in CLIL and bilingual education. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore & U. Smit (Ed.), Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual Education (pp. 1-26). Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783096145-004
Nunan, D. (2018). Teaching speaking to young learners. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0715
Omar, S. F., Nawi, H. S. A., Shahdan, T. S. T., Mee, R. W. M., Pek, L. S., & Yob, F. S. C. (2020). Interactive language learning activities for learners’ communicative ability. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 1010–1016. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20605
Pamuji, K. D., Setyarini, S., & Kurniawan, E. (2021). Extensive listening for teaching English to young EFL learners: The views of Asian EYL teachers. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 18(3), 976–984. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.3.17.976
Pebriantini, N. R., Vianty, M., & Amrullah, N. (2024). EFL teachers’ lived experiences in teaching English to young learners. Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i2.26985
Pinter, A. (2017). Teaching young language learners (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Pitukwong, K., & Saraiwang, S. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness of digital writing tools on Thai EFL students’ writing. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(3), ep519. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14808
Pižorn, K. (2017). 9. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): A panacea for young English language learners?. In J. Enever & E. Lindgren (Ed.), Early language learning: Complexity and mixed methods (pp. 145-163). Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783098323-011
Purnamaningwulan, R. A. (2024). Evaluating the efficacy of differentiated instruction in EFL speaking classes: A classroom action research study. Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(1), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i1.25635
Rokhayati, T., & Widiyanti, A. (2022). Using technology-based media for teaching speaking in intercultural education. Lingua Cultura, 16(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i1.7752
Sakurai, S. (2015). Bilingual education in primary school: Aspects of immersion, CLIL, and bilingual modules. Language and Education, 29(1), 83–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.895104
Setyaningrum, R. W., & Purwati, O. (2020). Projecting the implementation feasibility of CLIL approach for TEYL at primary schools in Indonesia. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 5(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v5i1.352
Siwa, Y. N., & Basthomi, Y. (2023). Students’ optimal engagement in EFL large classes: A Qualitative phenomenological study in East Nusa Tenggara. The Qualitative Report. 28(12), 3572-3591. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6073
Suhandoko, S. (2019). CLIL-oriented and task-based EFL materials development. ELT Worldwide Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v6i2.10662
Sulistiyo, U., Haryanto, E., Widodo, H. P., & Elyas, T. (2019). The portrait of primary school English in Indonesia: policy recommendations. Education 3-13, 48(8), 945–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2019.1680721
Sun, J. C., & Hsieh, P. (2018). Application of a gamified interactive response system to enhance the intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, student engagement, and attention of English learners. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 104–116. https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/ets/ets21.html#SunH18
Sundari, H. (2017). Classroom interaction in teaching English as foreign language at lower secondary schools in Indonesia. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(6), 147. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.6p.147
Thi, N., & Ha, T. (2021). Implementing digital techniques to stimulate EFL students’ engagement: A case study in Vietnam. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(3), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.11250/ijte.01.03.007
Wang, L., & Calvano, L. (2022). Class size, student behaviors and educational outcomes. Organization Management Journal, 19(4), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/omj-01-2021-1139
Widiantari, I. A. P. A., & Dewi, N. L. P. E. S. (2023). YouTube as an alternative learning media for independent bilingual young learners: A review. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 9(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v9i1.4611
Yang, W. (2014). Content and language integrated learning next in Asia: Evidence of learners’ achievement in CLIL education from a Taiwan tertiary degree programme. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(4), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.904840
Yufrizal, H. (2021). The impact of project based-CLIL on students’ English proficiency. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i1.15692
Zein, M. S. (2017). Elementary English education in Indonesia: Policy developments, current practices, and future prospects. English Today, 33(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078416000407
Zulfikar, T., Dahliana, S., & Sari, R. A. (2019). An Exploration of English students’ attitude towards English learning. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 2(1), 1–12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Khoiriyah, Estu Widodo, Naajihah Mafruudloh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the VELES Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
VELES Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
