From Knowledge to Practice: Investigating the TPACK Integration of Indonesian Pre-Service EFL Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v9i1.29414Keywords:
EFL, TPACK, pre-service teacher, teacher education, English language learningAbstract
Effective technology integration in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teaching requires teachers to develop strong Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). In Indonesia, where teacher education programs increasingly emphasize digital learning, understanding pre-service EFL teachers’ self-concept of TPACK is crucial for assessing their readiness before entering the profession. This study examines the TPACK profile of Indonesian pre-service EFL teachers, identifying their strengths and areas for improvement in applying technology to language instruction. The study involved 111 final-year undergraduate and first-year master's students who had completed teaching practice but had no formal teaching experience. Data were collected using a TPACK survey and analyzed through descriptive statistics to identify patterns in their TPACK mastery. Findings reveal that pre-service teachers are confident in their content knowledge (CK) and basic technological skills (TK). Still, they struggle with the full integration of technology into pedagogy (TPK), pedagogical adaptability (PK), and leadership in TPACK. While they acknowledge the importance of technology in teaching, gaps persist in their ability to select and apply diverse technologies effectively in classroom settings. Additionally, they face challenges adapting teaching strategies to different learners and assessing student understanding in varied ways. Their leadership in supporting peers with TPACK integration was also limited. These insights underscore the need for curricular enhancements in teacher education programs at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels, focusing on practical applications of TPACK, deeper technological and pedagogical training, and leadership development to better prepare future EFL educators for technology-enhanced instruction.
References
Abraham, M., Arficho, Z., Habtemariam, T., & Demissie, A. (2022). Effects of information communication technology-assisted teaching training on English language teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and proficiency. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2022.2028336
Ali, A., & Waer, H. (2023). Integrating TPACK in Pre-service teachers’ EFL course: Impacts on perception, knowledge, and practices. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.14221/1835-517x.6089
Alturki, U., & Aldraiweesh, A. (2021). Application of Learning Management System (LMS) during the COVID-19 pandemic: A sustainable acceptance model of the expansion technology approach. Sustainability, 13(19), 10991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910991
Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266
Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Stürmer, K., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Variability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility! Computers & Education, 166, 104159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104159
Ball, H. L. (2019). Conducting online surveys. Journal of Human Lactation, 35(3), 413–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419848734
Baek, E., & Sung, Y. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ perception of technology competencies based on the new ISTE technology standards. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 37(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2020.1815108
Bai, B., & Wang, J. (2020). The role of growth mindset, self-efficacy, and intrinsic value in self-regulated learning and English language learning achievements. Language Teaching Research, 27(1), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820933190
Barrot, J. S. (2022). Using social networking sites as a language teaching and learning environment. Language Teaching, 56(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444822000167
Batane, T., & Ngwako, A. (2016). Technology use by pre-service teachers during teaching practice: Are new teachers embracing technology right away in their first teaching experience? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2299
Boone, H., & Boone, D. (2012). Analyzing Likert data. Journal of Extension, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.50.02.48
Borgstede, M., & Scholz, M. (2021). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to generalization and replication–A representationalist view. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.605191
Carter, S. M., Shih, P., Williams, J., Degeling, C., & Mooney-Somers, J. (2021). Conducting qualitative research online: challenges and solutions. Patient, 14(6), 711–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00528-w
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Costache, O., Becker, E., Staub, F., & Mainhard, T. (2019). Using uncertainty as a learning opportunity during pre-lesson conferences in the teaching practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102890
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Drajati, N. A., Rakerda, H., Sulistyawati, H., Nurkamto, J., & Ilmi, M. (2021). Investigating the adoption of track-21cl by English pre-service teachers in a Covid-19 teaching practicum. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i1.34625
Essafi, M., Belfakir, L., & Moubtassime, M. (2024). Investigating mobile-assisted language learning apps: Babbel, memorize, and Duolingo as a case study. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 13(2), 197. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n2p197
Farjon, D., Smits, A., & Voogt, J. (2018). Attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience explain pre-service teachers' technology integration. Computers & Education, 130, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.010
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). McGraw Hill Higher Education.
Greene, M. D., Cheng, S., & Jones, W. M. (2023). The impact of an online technology course on pre-service teachers’ technological knowledge: Strategies and design. International Journal of Professional Development Learners and Learning, 5(2), ep2315. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/13772
Gurbuz, A., & Yildirim, R. (2022). Tackling the challenges posed by linguistic and cultural diversity in EFL classrooms. In Handbook of Research on Implications of Sustainable Development in Higher Education (pp. 230–250). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6172-3.ch011
Guskey, T. R. (2022). Can grades be an effective form of feedback? Phi Delta Kappan, 104(3), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217221136597
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Hastomo, T., Mandasari, B., & Widiati, U. (2024). Scrutinizing Indonesian pre-service teachers’ technological knowledge in utilizing AI-powered tools. Journal of Education and Learning, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21644
Hsu, L. (2016). Examining EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and the adoption of mobile-assisted language learning: a partial least square approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1287–1297. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1278024
Karakaya, K., & Bozkurt, A. (2022). Mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) research trends and patterns through bibliometric analysis: Empowering language learners through ubiquitous educational technologies. System, 110, 102925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102925
Khani, R., & Hajizadeh, A. (2016). The construct definition of an English language Teacher’ content knowledge. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2310
Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Educators (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771328
Kumar, J. A., Bervell, B., & Osman, S. (2020). Google Classroom: Insights from Malaysian higher education students’ and instructors’ experiences. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4175–4195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10163-x
Lachner, A., Fabian, A., Franke, U., Preiß, J., Jacob, L., Führer, C., Küchler, U., Paravicini, W., Randler, C., & Thomas, P. (2021). Fostering pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A quasi-experimental field study. Computers & Education, 174, 104304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104304
Ledger, S., & Fischetti, J. (2019). Micro-teaching 2.0: Technology as the classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4561
McDougall, T., & Phillips, M. (2024). Contextual considerations in TPACK: Collaborative processes in initial teacher education. Computers and Education Open, 7, 100207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100207
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Olofson, M. W., Swallow, M. J., & Neumann, M. D. (2016). TPACKing: A constructivist framing of TPACK to analyze teachers’ construction of knowledge. Computers & Education, 95, 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.010
Pazilah, F. N., Hashim, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). Service-learning in English as a second language teacher training program: Exploring pre-service teachers’ authentic learning experiences. Arab World English Journal, 12(2), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no2.26
Pitura, J. (2022). Using the e-questionnaire in qualitative applied linguistics research. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 100034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100034
Pradita, L., Mardiana, W., & Mustpa, D. (2023). Pre-service EFL teachers’ experience in integrating TPACK during teaching practice program. UC Journal: ELT, Linguistics and Literature Journal, 4(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.24071/uc.v4i1.5613
Santiago, B. J., Ramírez, J. M. O., Rodríguez-Reséndiz, J., Dector, A., García, R. G., González-Durán, J. E. E., & Sánchez, F. F. (2020). Learning management system-based evaluation to determine academic Efficiency performance. Sustainability, 12(10), 4256. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104256
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
Shaari, N. D., Shaari, A. H., & Abdullah, M. R. (2021). Investigating the impact of the flipped classroom on dual language learners’ perceptions and grammatical performance. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 690–709. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.18872
Shahnama, M., Ghonsooly, B., & Shirvan, M. E. (2021). A meta-analysis of the relative effectiveness of flipped learning in English as a second/foreign language research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1355–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09996-1
Soruc, A., & Griffiths, C. (2018). English as a medium of instruction: Students’ strategies. ELT Journal, 72(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx017
Syamdianita, & Cahyono, B. Y. (2021). The EFL pre-service teachers’ experiences and challenges in designing teaching materials using the TPACK framework. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 561–577. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.19202
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
Teng, F., & Reynolds, B. L. (2019). Effects of individual and group metacognitive prompts on EFL reading comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. PLoS ONE, 14(5), Article e0215902. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215902
Terzioğlu, Y., & Kurt, M. (2022). Elevating English language learners’ speaking fluency and listening skills through a learning management system. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221099937
Tseng, J. (2014). Developing an instrument for assessing technological pedagogical content knowledge as EFL students perceive. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.941369
Valtonen, T., Eriksson, M., Kärkkäinen, S., Tahvanainen, V., Turunen, A., Vartiainen, H., Kukkonen, J., & Sointu, E. (2022). Emerging imbalance in the development of TPACK - A challenge for teacher training. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5363–5383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11426-5
Warsi, L. Q., & Khurshid, K. (2022). The role of self-assessment in English language teachers’ professional development in Pakistan. Education Research International, 2022, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9401995
Wulandari, E. (2019). Teacher’s technological pedagogical content knowledge in developing learning materials. Lingua Pedagogia Journal of English Teaching Studies, 1(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.21831/lingped.v1i1.23983
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hilda Rakerda, Masyhudi Lathif, Marsandi Manar, Retno Wulan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the VELES Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
VELES Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
