A Comparative Study of the Teaching English Writing in Senior High Schools in Indonesia and Japan

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v6i1.5064

Keywords:

Teaching English writing, senior high school, Indonesia, Japan

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate Indonesian and Japanese English teachers’ perspectives about English writing, to examine current techniques in the teaching of writing used by senior high school teachers in Indonesia and Japan, and how to know whether there are some differences and/or similarities between teaching methodologies of English writing in both countries. This study surveyed 44 Indonesian senior high school teachers and 43 Japanese senior high school teachers through a questionnaire and an interview. The findings indicated that the Indonesian and Japanese senior high school teachers have different teaching methodologies for the improvement of students’ abilities in English writing. Lastly, a conclusion is provided, accompanied by limitations of the study and suggestions for further study.

Author Biographies

Sonny Elfiyanto, Universitas Islam Malang, Indonesia

Scopus Author Details Google Scholar Profile SINTA Author Profile

Sonny Elfiyanto is currently an English Lecture at Universitas Islam Malang, Indonesia. His research interest includes TEFL, especially Written Corrective Feedback, English Writing, and Assessment. He has taught English in both University and Senior High School levels in Indonesia. 

Seiji Fukazawa, Hiroshima University, Japan

Seiji Fukazawa is currently Professor Emeritus, Hiroshima University, Japan. His fields of study are interlanguage pragmatics, second language acquisition, and applied linguistics. He has been publishing in those areas extensively.

References

Al-Shehab, M. (2020). The role of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) in enhancing the writing skills of intermediate IEP students: Expectations vs reality. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 20, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2020.20.01

Bhatti, Z. I., Asif, S., Akbar, A., Ismail, N., & Najam, K. (2020). The impact of peer scaffolding through process approach on EFL learners’ academic writing fluency. Epistemology, 7(1), 102-110. Retrieved January 20, 2022, from https://journal.epistemology.pk/index.php/epistemology/article/view/120

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903

Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2019). Language learner autonomy in a tertiary context: Teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 9-38.

Budiharto, R. A. (2018). Native language interference on target language writings of Indonesian EFL students: An exploratory case study. Indonesian EFL Journal, 5(1), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v5i1.1630.

Cook, M. (2012). Revisiting Japanese English teachers’ (JTEs) perceptions of communicative, audio-lingual, and grammar translation (yakudoku) activities: Beliefs, practices, and rationales. Asian EFL Journal, 14(2), 79-98.

Currier, D. (2008). Essay on the importance of writing-need feedback please. Asian EFL Journal, 80, 183-199.

Elfiyanto, S., & Fukazawa, S. (2021). Three written corrective feedback sources in improving Indonesian and Japanese students’ writing achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 433-450. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14325a

Faridi, A., Saleh, M., & Fitriati, S. W. (2020). The effect of hybrid task-based language teaching and critical thinking on writing performance in Indonesia. The New Educational Review, 61(3), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2020.61.3.09

Gezmiş, N. (2020). Difficulties of students in process writing approach. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 565-579. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.759249

Goldstein, A. A., & Carr, P. G. (1996). Can students benefit from process writing? NAEPfacts, 1(3). Retrieved January 28, 2022, from shorturl.at/doxT3

Gorsuch, G. J. (1998). Yakudoku EFL instruction in two Japanese high school classrooms: An exploratory study. JALT Journal, 20, 6-32.

Graham, S., Capizzi, A., Harris, K. R., Hebert, M., & Morphy, P. (2014). Teaching writing to middle school students: a national survey. Reading and Writing, 27, 1015-1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9495-7

Graham, S. (2018): A revised writer(s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406

Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Harlow: Pearson Longman.

Heggart, K., & Yoo, J. (2018). Getting the most from Google Classroom: A pedagogical framework for tertiary educators. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 140–153. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.220829

High school students struggle with speaking, writing English. (2015, March 17). The Japan Times. Retrieved June 17, 2018, from https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/03/17/national/high-school-students-struggle-with-speaking-writing-english/

Hirata, Y. (2018). E-learning courseware for language education in Japan: Its application and student perceptions. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 33(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1454833

Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2019). The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: A Meta-Analysis, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 863-880. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896

Iwamoto, M. & Kramer, B. (2020). NGSL coverage of the SHS entrance exam and national central test. The Language Teacher, 44(5), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTTLT44.5-1

Ito, H. (2006). English language education at Finnish primary schools through teachers’ perceptions and beliefs. JACET Bulletin, 43, 29-42.

Kellogg, R. T. (2001). Long-term working memory in text production. Memory & Cognition, 29, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195739

Kelly, N., & J. Bruen. (2015). “Translation as a pedagogical tool in the Foreign Language Classroom: A qualitative study of attitudes and behaviours. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541720

Kemendikbud (Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan). (2013). Permendikbud nomor 69 tahun 2013 tentang KD dan struktur kurikulum SMA-MA [The decree of the Ministry of Education number 69 2013 about senior high school’s basic competence and curriculum structure]. Retrieved July 7, 2018, from http://bsnp-indonesia.org/2013/06/20/permendikbud-tentang-kurikulum-tahun-2013/

Kemendikbud (Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan). (2018). Konsep dan implementasi kurikulum 2013. [The concept and implementation of curriculum 2013]. Retrieved July 7, 2018, from https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/kemdikbud/dokumen/Paparan/Paparan%20Wamendik.pdf

Kim, J. (2020). Learning and teaching online during Covid-19: Experiences of student teachers in an early childhood education practicum. IJEC, 52, 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-020-00272-6

Kuzborska, I. (2011). Links between teachers’ beliefs and practices and research on reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 23(1), 102-128.

Latupeirissa, D. S., & Sayd, A. I. (2019). Grammatical errors of writing in EFL class: A case in Indonesia. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 5(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v5n2.605

Le, M. T. (2021). Students’ attitude towards using smartphones and portable devices for studying writing. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(3), 54–64. Retrieved from http://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/13

Li, X. (2012). The role of teachers’ beliefs in the language teaching-learning process. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(7), 1397-1402. https://doi.org/doi:10.4304/tpls.2.7.1397-1402

Mahboob, A. (2014). Epilogue: Understanding language variation: Implications for EIL pedagogy. In R. Marlina & R.A. Giri (Eds.), The pedagogy of English as an international language: Perspectives from scholars, teachers, and students (pp. 257-265). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06127-6

MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology). (2014). Report on the future improvement and enhancement of English education (Outline): Five recommendations on the English education reform plan responding to the rapid globalization. Retrieved June 10, 2018, from http://www.mext.go.jp/en/ news/topics/ detail/1372625.htm

MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology). (2018). Koutougakkou gakushu shidou yoryo an ni taisuru iken kōbo tetsudzuki [Study of course guideline for foreign languages in senior high schools; Public comment on proposal]. Retrieved September 19, 2021, from http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/ houdou/30/02/1401394.htm

National Writing Project. (2007). The 2007 survey on teaching writing: American public opinion on the importance of writing in schools. Retrieved March 17, 2019, from http://www.writingproject.org/Resources/dcupdate/background.csp

Nowlan, A., & Samuell, C. (2019). Communicative language teaching: Contemporary applications in Japan. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review, 24, 77-87.

Obisuru, M., & Purbani, W. (2016). Kemampuan menulis Bahasa Inggris siswa melalui self-editing and self-correcting berdasarkan analisis kesalahan gramatikal dan kosakata [Improving the students English writing skill through self-editing and self-correcting based on grammatical and vocabulary error analysis]. LingTera, 3(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v3i1.8473

Sangeetha, V. (2020). Inculcating self-editing skills for enhancing writing skills of the EFL students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 509-522. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13133a

Yale, J. B. (2010). The relationship between reading and writing. Retrieved March 11, 2019, from http://www.k12reader.com/the-relationship-between-reading-and-writing

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2022-04-23