Evaluating the Effect of EFL College Students’ Intention To Utilize Mobile English Vocabulary in The Learning Process: A TAM Framework

Authors

  • Haidar Farros Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
  • Arundati Shinta Universitas Proklamasi 45
  • Zaid Zaid Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Mahbub Pasca Al Bahy Azərbaycan Turizm və Menecment Universiteti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v6i1.5277

Keywords:

EFL college student, English vocabulary, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, technology acceptance model

Abstract

In today's world, it is no longer a surprise that (smart) mobile devices have become the most helpful technological devices to be used for various purposes, one of which is in English education. Therefore, studies on improving language learning, especially vocabulary for learners using mobile device technology, have become commonplace in today's digital era. However, to achieve maximum use, there needs to be an intention from students to accept the English vocabulary technology in the learning process. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the integration capability of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to predict and explain EFL college students' intention to utilize mobile English vocabulary learning. This research involves TAM because TAM has been widely applied to study information technology because of its effectiveness in assessing the level of user acceptance. Through a quantitative method using a cross-sectional survey approach involving 456 respondents, this study ultimately found that, after being analyzed using the PLS-SEM analysis technique, the constructs in TAM, including perceived ease of use (β = 0.302, T-Value = 6.587, and P-value = 0.000) and usefulness (β = 0.359, T-Value = 7.501, dan P-value = 0.000), had a positive and significant effect on EFL college students' intention to utilize mobile English vocabulary. Perceived usefulness shows the most dominant effect. However, this study has limitations that need to be considered. And, of course, caution in generalizing is necessary.

References

Al-Gahtani, S. S. (2016). Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model. Applied Computing and Informatics, 12(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACI.2014.09.001

Alfadda, H. A., & Mahdi, H. S. (2021). Measuring Students’ Use of Zoom Application in Language Course Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(4), 883–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10936-020-09752-1/TABLES/6

Ameen, N., Willis, R., Abdullah, M. N., & Shah, M. (2019). Towards the successful integration of e-learning systems in higher education in Iraq: A student perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1434–1446. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.12651

Baron, R. (2020). Studentsâ€TM Perception on Online Application in Speaking Skill e-Learning. VELES Voices of English Language Education Society, 4(2), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles journal.v4i2.2543

Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2018). Predicting students’ intention to adopt mobile learning: A combination of theory of reasoned action and technology acceptance model. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 11(2), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-03-2017-0004

Cakır, R., & Solak, E. (2015). Attitude of Turkish EFL Learners towards e-Learning through Tam Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 596–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.01.515

Calisir, F., Altin Gumussoy, C., Bayraktaroglu, A. E., & Karaali, D. (2014). Predicting the Intention to Use a Web-Based Learning System: Perceived Content Quality, Anxiety, Perceived System Quality, Image, and the Technology Acceptance Model. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 24(5), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/HFM.20548

Chen, H. L., Vicki Widarso, G., & Sutrisno, H. (2020). A ChatBot for Learning Chinese: Learning Achievement and Technology Acceptance: Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(6), 1161–1189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120929622

Chocarro, R., Cortiñas, M., & Marcos-Matás, G. (2021). Teachers’ attitudes towards chatbots in education: a technology acceptance model approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users’ characteristics. Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1850426

Chung, H.-H., Chen, S.-C., & Kuo, M.-H. (2015). A Study of EFL College Students’ Acceptance of Mobile Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.01.479

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Eraslan Yalcin, M., & Kutlu, B. (2019). Examination of students’ acceptance of and intention to use learning management systems using extended TAM. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2414–2432. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.12798

Haghighi, H., Jafarigohar, M., Khoshsima, H., & Vahdany, F. (2018). Impact of flipped classroom on EFL learners’ appropriate use of refusal: achievement, participation, perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 261–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1504083

Hoi, V. N., & Mu, G. M. (2021). Perceived teacher support and students’ acceptance of mobile-assisted language learning: Evidence from Vietnamese higher education context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 879–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.13044

Hsu, H. T., & Lin, C. C. (2022). Extending the technology acceptance model of college learners’ mobile-assisted language learning by incorporating psychological constructs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.13165

Huang, F., Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2017). Factors Affecting Chinese English as a Foreign Language Teachers’ Technology Acceptance: A Qualitative Study: Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(1), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117746168

Ifinedo, P. (2006). Acceptance and Continuance Intention of Web-based Learning Technologies (WLT) Use among University Students in a Baltic Country. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 23(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/J.1681-4835.2006.TB00151.X

Jiang, M. Y. chao, Jong, M. S. yung, Lau, W. W. fat, Meng, Y. L., Chai, C. S., & Chen, M. (2021). Validating the General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning: Evidence From an Online English as a Foreign Language Course Amid COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 671615. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2021.671615

Kumar Basak, S., Wotto, M., & Bélanger, P. (2018). E-learning, M-learning and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis: E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018785180

Liu, H., Lin, C. H., & Zhang, D. (2017). Pedagogical beliefs and attitudes toward information and communication technology: a survey of teachers of English as a foreign language in China. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 745–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1347572

Mahdi, H. S. (2017). Effectiveness of Mobile Devices on Vocabulary Learning: A Meta-Analysis: Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(1), 134–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117698826

Mei, B., Brown, G. T. L., & Teo, T. (2017). Toward an Understanding of Preservice English as a Foreign Language Teachers’ Acceptance of Computer-Assisted Language Learning 2.0 in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(1), 74–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117700144

Mortazavi, M., Nasution, M. K. M., Abdolahzadeh, F., Behroozi, M., & Davarpanah, A. (2021). Sustainable Learning Environment by Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Methods on the Improvement of Productive and Receptive Foreign Language Skills: A Comparative Study for Asian Universities. Sustainability, 13(11), 6328. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13116328

Nardi, P. M. (2014). Doing survey research (3rd ed.). Paradigm.

Natasia, S. R., Wiranti, Y. T., & Parastika, A. (2022). Acceptance analysis of NUADU as e-learning platform using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach. Procedia Computer Science, 197, 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2021.12.168

Poong, Y. S., Yamaguchi, S., & Takada, J. I. (2016). Investigating the drivers of mobile learning acceptance among young adults in the World Heritage town of Luang Prabang, Laos: Information Development, 33(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916638136

Putra, I. D. G. R. D., Saukah, A., Basthomi, Y., & Irawati, E. (2020). The Acceptance of the English Language Learning Mobile Application Hello English Across Gender and Experience Differences. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(15), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V15I15.11077

Rojabi, A. R. (2021). EFL Learners’ Perceptions on Schoology Use in the Reading Class. VELES Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles journal.v5i1.3219

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JFBS.2014.01.002

Scherer, R., & Teo, T. (2019). Unpacking teachers’ intentions to integrate technology: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 27, 90–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EDUREV.2019.03.001

Soleimani, E., Ismail, K., & Mustaffa, R. (2014). The Acceptance of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) among Post Graduate ESL Students in UKM. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.02.062

Song, Y., & Ma, Q. (2021). Affordances of a mobile learner-generated tool for pupils’ English as a second language vocabulary learning: An ecological perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 858–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.13037

Wang, C. S., Huang, Y. M., & Hsu, K. S. (2017). Developing a mobile game to support students in learning color mixing in design education: Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016685226

Yurdagül, C., & Öz, S. (2018). Attitude towards Mobile Learning in English Language Education. Education Sciences, 8(3), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI8030142

Zhang, D., & Pérez-Paredes, P. (2019). Chinese postgraduate EFL learners’ self-directed use of mobile English learning resources. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(8), 1128–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1662455

Zhonggen, Y., & Xiaozhi, Y. (2019). An extended technology acceptance model of a mobile learning technology. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(3), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/CAE.22111

Zhou, S., Zhou, Y., & Zhu, H. (2021). Predicting Chinese University Students’ E-Learning Acceptance and Self-Regulation in Online English Courses: Evidence From Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) During COVID-19: SAGE Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211061379

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2022-04-23

How to Cite

Farros, H., Shinta, A., Zaid, Z., & Al Bahy, M. P. (2022). Evaluating the Effect of EFL College Students’ Intention To Utilize Mobile English Vocabulary in The Learning Process: A TAM Framework. Voices of English Language Education Society, 6(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v6i1.5277

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): VELES Voices of English Language Education Society

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with the VELES Journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Creative Commons License

VELES Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.