EFL Learners’ Attitude towards Teacher’s and Peers’ Written Corrective Feedback
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v7i1.6085Keywords:
attitude, written corrective feedback, direct-indirect correction, global-local correctionAbstract
This research was aimed at revealing EFL learners’ attitude toward their teacher’s and peers’ written corrective feedback (WCF) on their composition in the context of teaching and learning English as a foreign language (EFL). Fifty-nine students were involved in this research. The questionnaire on a three-point Likert scale – showing options of agree, neutral, and disagree – was used to collect the research data. Further, the result of data analysis showed that: (1) the learners generally showed positive attitude toward both the teacher’s and peers’ WCF; (2) they felt challenged and encouraged when their teacher or their peers always corrected the errors they had made in their composition; (3) they indicated more positive attitude toward direct than toward indirect WCF; (4) they expected their most frequent errors in their composition to be corrected; (5) they preferred their global errors to be corrected than their local errors.; and (6) they preferred their errors to be corrected by their teacher than by their peer. Based on the findings, it can then be concluded that WCF is generally needed by EFL learners when learning to write composition. It needs to be provided with such considerations as what types of correction techniques are used (direct and/or indirect), which errors are prioritized to correct (the most frequent); and who should correct the errors (teachers are preferred against peers).
References
Benson, S., & DeKeyser, R. (2019). Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy. Language Teaching Research, 23(6), 702–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818770921
Bitchener, J. (2021). Written Corrective Feedback. In The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 207–225). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589789.011
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002
Brutt-Griffler, J. (2021). Decision letter for "ESL learners’ perception and its relationship with the efficacy of written corrective feedback". Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12378/v1/decision1
Budianto, S., Sulistyo, T., Widiastuti, O., Heriyawati, D. F., & Marhaban, S. (2020). Written corrective feedback across different levels of efl students’ academic writing proficiency: Outcomes and implications. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 472–485. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16569
Cinkara, E., & Galaly, F. J. (2018). EFL students’ and teachers’ attitudes towards written feedback in writing classes: A case of Iraqi high-schools. I-Manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 8(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.8.1.13947
Damanik, J. Y. (2022). Peer feedback to improve Indonesian adult learners ’ writing skills : A literature review. JET: Journal of English Teaching, 8(1), 49–58.
Elfiyanto, S., & Fukazawa, S. (2020). Effect of teacher and peer written corrective feedback on writing components in EFL classrooms. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 5(2), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v5i2.826
Eslami, E. (2014). The effects of direct and indirect corrective feedback techniques on EFL students’ writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.438
Facullo, K. (2022). Effectiveness of written feedback strategies. International Journal of Recent Research in Interdisciplinary Sciences (IJRRIS), 9(2), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6505479
Hyland, F. (2010). Future directions in feedback on second language writing: Overview and research agenda. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119251
Janah, U., Usadiati, W., & Ristati, R. (2021). Written Corrective Feedback Applied By English Teacher At the Eighth Grade Students of Smp Nu Palangka Raya. Intensive Journal, 4(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.31602/intensive.v4i2.5750
Lee, I. (2019). Teacher written corrective feedback: Less is more. In Language Teaching (Vol. 52, Issue 4, pp. 524–536). Cambridge University Press (CUP). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444819000247
Lee, I. (2021). Written Corrective Feedback. In Research Questions in Language Education and Applied Linguistics (pp. 425–429). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79143-8_76
Mafulah, S., & Basthomi, Y. (2022). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ spelling errors. 67th TEFLIN International Virtual Conference & the 9th ICOELT 2021, 624, 199–203. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n8p53
Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2020). Feedback scope in written corrective feedback: Analysis of empirical research in L2 contexts. Assessing Writing, 45(November 2019), 100469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100469
Plaindaren, C., & Shah, P. M. (2019). A study on the effectiveness of written feedback in writing tasks among upper secondary school pupils. Creative Education, 10(13), 3491–3508. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1013269
Ranalli, J. (2018). Automated written corrective feedback: how well can students make use of it? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1428994
Rashtchi, M., & bin Abu Bakar, Z. (2019). Written corrective feedback: What do Malaysian learners prefer and why? International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5), 1221. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.E1173.0585C19
Ravand, H., & Rasekh, A. E. (2011). Feedback in ESL writing: Toward an interactional approach. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 1136–1145. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.5.1136-1145
Rouhi, A., & Azizian, E. (2013). Peer review: Is giving corrective feedback better than receiving it in L2 writing? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93(May), 1349–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.042
Sabarun, S. (2020). Teacher corrective feedback in EFL writing class at higher education: What students perceive. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 9(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv9i14652
Sherpa, S. Z. (2021). Effects of direct and indirect written corrective feedback on bhutanese learners’ grammatical accuracy over time. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(1), 574–603.
Tang, C., & Liu, Y. T. (2018). Effects of indirect coded corrective feedback with and without short affective teacher comments on L2 writing performance, learner uptake and motivation. Assessing Writing, 35, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.12.002
Teo, A. (Lei) K. (2006). Social-Interactive Writing for English Language Learners. The CATESOL Journal, 18(1), 160–178.
Tursina, P., & Chuang, M.-T. (2016). Direct and indirect corrective feedback on EFL students’ writing performance. The 1st English Education International Conference (EEIC) In, 209–214.
Vaezi, S., & Abbaspour, E. (2015). Asynchronous online peer written corrective feedback: Effects and affects. Handbook of Research on Individual Differences in Computer-Assisted Language Learning, April 2019, 271–297. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8519-2.ch012
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Wahyuni, S. (2021). Interactional approach in improving students’ writing skills as s strengthening of theaAbility of religious moderation at State Islamic Institute of Kediri. INFERENSI: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 15(1), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.18326/infsl3.v15i1.163-184
Wang, T., & Jiang, L. (2015). Studies on written corrective feedback: Theoretical perspectives, Empirical evidence, And future directions. English Language Teaching, 8(1), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n1p110
Wauningsihyh, S. (2020). The role of corrective feedback on academic writing performance: EFL students’ perceptions. Edulingua: Jurnal Linguistiks Terapan Dan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 7(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.34001/edulingua.v7i1.1167
Wei, W., & Cao, Y. (2020). Written corrective feedback strategies employed by university English lecturers: A teacher cognition perspective. SAGE Open, 10(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020934886
Yeo, M. (2018). When Less May Be More: Rethinking Teachers’ Written Corrective Feedback Practices: Interview with Icy Lee. In RELC Journal (Vol. 49, Issue 2, pp. 257–261). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217738819
Zahroh, R., Mujiyanto, J., & Saleh, M. (2020). Students’ attitudes toward teachers’ written corrective feedback and their writing skill. English Education Journal, 10(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v10i1.32511
Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37(November 2017), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the VELES Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
VELES Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
