Social-Psychological Issues in EFL Speaking Class based on Collaborative Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v7i1.6239Keywords:
Behavior, cognition, collaborative speaking-EFL, social-psychologyAbstract
Collaborative learning (CL) is relatively a novel approach applied in teaching speaking at the context of English as a foreign language (EFL). Statistically, even if CL has widely been investigated in the field of language teaching, it is still rarely found articles discussing CL issues related to social-psychological perspective. Therefore, this study has the purpose of investigating the variables that influence and are encountered by the student's speaking abilities during cooperation. Five students were used in the research in order to conduct an interview. They were deliberately chosen from their peers because they spoke English the best. Information was acquired through an online interview via the use of the WhatsApp calling app. Additionally, the ATLAS.ti application was used to evaluate the collected data. The results showed that 25 sub-dimensions and three major dimensions: social cognition, relationships, and social behavior significantly affected students' speaking abilities in EFL. The curriculum creator is advised to include social psychology into the English language instruction curriculum nevertheless. It suggests a classroom experiment with planned and unplanned speaking performances for further research.
References
Al-Tamimi, A. R., & Tamimi, A. O. (2014). Effectiveness of co-operative learning in enhancing speaking skills and attitude towards learning English. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(4), 27–45. https://doi.org/10. 5296/.
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1(1), 91.
Bailey, K. M., & Nunan, D. (2005). Practical English language teaching: speaking.
Bigelow, K. M., & Morris, E. K. (2001). John B. Watson’s advice on child rearing: Some historical context. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 10(1), 26.
Bruffee, K. A., Palmer, P. J., Gullette, M. M., & Gillespie, D. (1994). The art of collaborative learning: Making the most of knowledgeable peers. Change, 26(3), 38.
Butarbutar, R. (2018). Analyzing nonverbal communication in seminar presentation. Magistra: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 038-047.
Butarbutar, R. (2021). Student’s perception of task difficulties in technology-mediated task-based language teaching. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 9(1), 129-144.
Butarbutar, R. (2021). How does Technology Vocaroo Improve Students’ Speaking Ability? A Study from Student, Teacher, and Researcher’s Perspective. Journal of Positive Psychology and Wellbeing, 5(3), 1635-1640.
Butarbutar, R., Uspayanti, R., Bawawa, M., & Leba, S. M. R. Mobile assisted language learning. In 3rd International Conference on Social Sciences (ICSS 2020) (pp. 390-392). Atlantis Press.
Butarbutar, R., & Sauhenda, A. F. (2020). Improving Students' Speaking Ability by Using Procedural Text. Magistra: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(2), 125-136.
Celce-Murcia, M., & McIntosh, L. (1991). Teaching English as a second or foreign language.
Cooper, P., & McIntyre, D. (1996). Effective teaching and learning: Teachers' and students' perspectives. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99(4), 689.
Geetha, M., & Karthiga, S. V. (2020). A study on the effect of collaborative learning techniques to enhance speaking skills. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(7), 391–397.
Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American psychologist, 46(2), 107.
Gillies, R. M. (2004). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning. Learning and instruction, 14(2), 197-213.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. Pearson longman.
Hinkel, E. (2018). Teaching speaking in integrated‐skills classes. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–6.
Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Learning together and alone: Overview and meta‐analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(1), 95–105.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (1989). Impact of goal and resource interdependence on problem-solving success. The Journal of Social Psychology, 129(5), 621–629.
Kato, Y., Bolstad, F., & Watari, H. (2015). Cooperative and collaborative learning in the language classroom. The Language Teacher, 39(2), 22-26.
Lambert, W. E. (1980). The social psychology of language: A perspective for the 1980’s. In Language (pp. 415–424). Elsevier.
Leba, S. M. R., Butarbutar, R., & Werang, B. R. (2021). Exploring the English Learning Strategies of an Indigenous Papuan Student of Indonesia. Qualitative Report, 26(9).
Liu, T. Y., & Chu, Y. L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630-643.
McDonough, K. (2004). Student-student interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32(2), 207-224.
Macnamara, J. (1967). The bilingual’s linguistic performance—A psychological overview. Journal of Social Issues, 23(2), 58–77.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage publications.
Namaziandost, E., Homayouni, M., & Rahmani, P. (2020). The impact of cooperative learning approach on the development of EFL students’ speaking fluency. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1780811.
Nur, S., & Butarbutar, R. (2022). Empowering EFL student’s Self-efficacy through Collaborative task-based Instruction: A Critical Review. VELES Voices of English Language Education Society, 6(1), 118-129.
Nur, S., Butarbutar, R., Ardiningtyas, S. Y., & Alimuddin, A. H. A Systematic Review on Integrating MALL in English Language Teaching. ELT Worldwide: Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(1), 56-69.
Pishkar, K., Moinzadeh, A., & Dabaghi, A. (2017). Modern English Drama and the Students' Fluency and Accuracy of Speaking. English Language Teaching, 10(8), 69-77.
Richards, J. C. (2005). Communicative language teaching today. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Salmons, J. (2014). Qualitative online interviews: Strategies, design, and skills. Sage Publications.
Shaffer, D. R., & Kipp, K. (2013). Developmental psychology: Childhood and adolescence. Cengage Learning.
Skinner, B. F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review, 57(4), 193.
Tindale, R. S., & Anderson, E. M. (2002). Small group research and applied social- psychology. In Theory and research on small groups (pp. 1-8). Springer, Boston, MA.
Trope, Y. (1986). Self-enhancement and self-assessment in achievement behavior.
Ur, P. (2012). A course in English language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Wang, Y., & Liao, H.-C. (2017). Learning performance enhancement using computer-assisted language learning by collaborative learning groups. Symmetry, 9(8), 141.
Wen, Y. (2021). Augmented reality enhanced cognitive engagement: Designing classroom-based collaborative learning activities for young language students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 843–860.
Yuyi, Q. I. U. (2022). College English Learning Strategies Based on Communicative Teaching Platform. Studies in Literature and Language, 24(3), 99–104.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the VELES Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
VELES Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
