Classroom-Based Assessment Practices during the COVID-19 Outbreak in Indonesia: EFL Students’ Perceptions and Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v7i1.7088Keywords:
challenges, classroom-based assessment, online language assessment, perceptionsAbstract
The perceptions of Indonesian EFL students on classroom-based assessment practices during the COVID-19 outbreak and the challenges they faced have received little attention. This phenomenon is the basis for why this research was conducted. To collect the data, questionnaires and interviews were applied to 20 senior high school students from grades eleventh and twelfth in Indonesia. Using a mixed-method design, this study declared that most students preferred classroom-based assessment during the COVID-19 outbreak, which was conducted online rather than traditional assessment before the outbreak. Classroom-based assessment practices during COVID-19 are considered more convenient and flexible, feel relaxed and less anxious, and improve their self-regulated learning. Moreover, Indonesian EFL students also revealed the challenges they faced in completing the assessment, such as internet network problems when the weather was terrible, the data package they used during the learning and assessment process being extravagant, and the lack of physical interaction with teachers and classmates. Further discussion about classroom-based assessment practices during the COVID-19 outbreak is necessary for more effective implementation and to positively affect EFL students and teachers.References
Adiarsi, G. R., Stellarosa, Y., & Silaban, M. W. (2015). Literasi Media internet dikalangan
mahasiswa. HUMANIORA, 6(4).
Amalia, R. (2018). Students’ perception of online assessment use in Schoology in EFL classrooms. Surabaya: Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis of Sunan Ampel State Islamic University. Retrieved from http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/28639/
Aydin, S., Akkas, F. D., Turnuk, T., Beydilli, A. B., & Saydam, I. (2020). Test anxiety among foreign language learners: A qualitative study. The Qualitative Report, 25(12), 4289-4309. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4686
Azmina, B., Solihah, M., & Guritno, A. (2017). University students’ perception of online examination using Google Form. Jurnal Britania, 1(1), 121-135. Retrieved from https://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/Britania/article/view/4318
Barbera, E., Gomez-Rey, P., & Fernandez-Navarro, F. (2016). A cross-national study of teacher’s perceptions of online learning success. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 31(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2016.1151350
Bengtsson, L. (2019). Take-home exams in higher education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 9(4), 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040267
Biggs, J. B. (1995). Assumptions underlying new approaches to educational assessment: Implications for Hong Kong. Curriculum Forum, 4(2), 1-22.
Borup, J., & Evmenova, A. S. (2019). The effectiveness of professional development in overcoming obstacles to effective online instruction in a college of education. Online Learning Journal, 23(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1468
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Brown, S. (2014). Assessment for learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 81-89.
Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory Pract, 55, 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989
Dolin, J., Black, P., Harlen, W., & Tiberghien, A. (2018). Exploring relations between formative and summative assessment, in Transforming Assessment. eds. J. Dolin and R. Evans (Cham, Switzerland: Springer), 53-80.
Ediger, M. (2015). Selected leading American educational psychologists. College Student Journal, 49, 527-530. Retrieved from http://www.projectinnovation.com
Ehiobuche, C. (2013). Reading through motivational theories. Clear International Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 4(11), 23-27. Retrieved from https://ijrcm.org.in/article_info.php?article_id=3974
Fitriyah, I., & Jannah, M. (2021). Online assessment effect in EFL classroom: An investigation on students and teachers’ perceptions. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 265-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v5i2.709
Heigham, J., & Crocker, A. R. (2009). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hindal, H., Reid, N., & Badgaish, M. (2009). Working memory, performance and learner characteristics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27(2), 187-204. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/166779/
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 3. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Hung, M. L., & Chou, C. (2015). Students’ perceptions of instructors’ roles in blended and online learning environments: A comparative study. Computers & Education 81(1), 315-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.022
Iskandar, N., Ganesan, N., & Maulana, N. S. E. A. (2021). Students’ perception towards the usage of online assessment in University Putra Malaysia amidst COVID-19 pandemic. Quest Journals: Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 9(2), 09-16. Retrieved from www.questjournals.org
Khan. S., & Khan. R. A. (2018). Online assessments: Exploring perspectives of university students. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 661–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9797-0
Leung, C. (2014). Classroom-based assessment issues for language teacher education. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), The Companion to Language Assessment. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Lewis, S. E. (2020). Chemistry assessments through the sudden implementation of online instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3418–3422. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00697
Lewkowicz, J., & Leung, C. (2021). Classroom-based assessment. Language Teaching, 54, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000506
Lynam, S., & Cachia, M. (2018). Students’ perceptions of the role of assessment at higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1329928
Mohamadi, Z. (2018). Comparative effect of online summative and formative assessment on EFL student writing ability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.003
Mcmillan, J. H. (2013). Why we need research on classroom assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment. Sage.
Obasa, A. I., Eludire, A. A., & Ajao, T. A. (2013). A comparative study of synchronous and asynchronous e-learning resources. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2(11), 5938-5946.
Pascu, M., Petculescu, D. C., & Stupariu, I. P. (2023). Investigating students’ perception of online assessment as a result of the interaction among the extrinsic assessment factors on students psychological characteristics. Education Sciences, 13(2), 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020193
Sheard, J. (2018). Quantitative data analysis. In K. Williamson, & G. Johanson (Eds.), Research Methods: Information, Systems, and Contexts, Second Edition (2nd ed., 429-452). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102220-7.00018-2
Spivey, M. F., & McMillan, J. J. (2014). Classroom versus online assessment. Journal of Education for Business, 89(8), 450-456. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2014.937676
Tam, A. C. F. (2021). Students’ perceptions of and learning practices in online timed take-home examinations during COVID-19. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 477-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1928599
Tam, A. C. F. (2021). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of and responses to exemplar-based dialogic feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 269-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1772957
Wang, C., Yan, J., & Liu, B. (2014). An empirical study on washback effects of the internetbased college English test band 4 in China. English Language Teaching, 7(6), 26. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n6p26
Wihastyanang, W. D., & Latief, M. A. (2018). The impact of electronic feedback on students’ writing quality. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 8(4), 8.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the VELES Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
VELES Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
