Analisis Interaksi antara Pembelajaran RME Berbantuan Adobe Flash CS6 dengan Kemampuan Awal Matematika dalam Meningkatkan Literasi Matematis

Uba Umbara, Zuli Nuraeni

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the interaction between the RME approach and conventional with the initial ability of mathematics in improving students' mathematical literacy. The research method used in this study was quasi-experimental with the design of a non-equivalent control group design. Data retrieval is done through mathematical literacy tests. The data analysis method that the researchers conducted was the Two-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) using the general linear univariate analysis model. The subjects in the study were grade VIII students of SMP Negeri 3 Kuningan, which numbered 309 students. The sampling technique was carried out using purposive sampling technique, taking into account the homogeneity of Prior Mathematical Learning Abilitystudents'in both classes determined by giving initial tests to students. The research sample amounted to 65 students, which were divided into two classes. The results of the study showed that there was no interaction between RME learning and the conventional category of students 'ability to students' mathematical literacy. However, for each level of students’ initial mathematical abilities, an increase in students' mathematical literacy skills with learning using the RME learning assisted by Adobe Flash CS6 is higher than students who obtain conventional learning. 

Keywords


adobe flash CS6; mathematical literacy; prior mathematical; RME

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmar, D. S. (2016). Hubungan antara kemampuan awal dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif dalam kimia peserta didik kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri se-Kabupaten Takalar. Sainsmat, 5(2).

De Lange, J. (2003). Mathematics for literacy. Quantitative literacy: Why numeracy matters for Schools and Colleges, 85, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/b97511.

Dede, C. (2000). Emerging influences of information technology on school curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202700182763.

Dubinsky, E. (2000). Using a theory of learning in college mathematics courses. Teaching and Learning Undergraduate Mathematics, 12, 10–15. https://doi.org/10.11120/msor.2001.01020010.

Grant, S. G. (2012). Reforming reading, writing, and mathematics: Teachers’ responses and the prospects for systemic reform. Routledge.

Hevriansyah, P., & Megawanti, P. (2017). Pengaruh kemampuan awal terhadap hasil belajar matematika. JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika), 2(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.30998/jkpm.v2i1.1893.

Hidayat, R., & Iksan, Z. H. (2015). The effect of realistic mathematics education on students’ conceptual understanding of linear progamming. Creative Education, 6(22), 2438. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.622251.

Julie, C. (2006). Mathematical literacy: Myths, further inclusions and exclusions. Pythagoras, 12(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v0i64.100.

Khafid, M. (2008). Faktor--faktor yang mempengaruhi ketuntasan belajar akuntansi: motivasi belajar sebagai variabel intervening. Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan, 37(1).

Kurniah, N., Basir, F., & Ikram, M. (2018). Pola interaksi siswa dalam belajar matematika berdasarkan kemampuan awal melalui pembelajaran kooperatif. Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1).

Kurz, T., Middleton, J., & Bahadir Yanik, H. (2004). Preservice teachers conceptions of mathematics-based software. In International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 313–320.

Lailiyah, R. I., & Rohayati, S. (2015). Pengembangan media pembelajaran berbasis adobe flash CS6 pada materi jurnal penyesuaian perusahaan dagang kelas X-AK SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Taman. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi (JPAK), 3(1).

OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving, revised edition. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-en.

Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use? Journal of Mathematics Education., 4(1), 89–100. Retrieved from http://educationforatoz.com/images/8.Bobby_Ojose_--_Mathematics_Literacy_Are_We_Able_To_Put_The_Mathematics_We_Learn_Into_Everyday_Use.pdf.

Razak, F. (2017). Hubungan kemampuan awal terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis matematika pada siswa kelas VII SMP Pesantren IMMIM Putri Minasatene. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v6i1.299.

Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Routledge.

Reimers, S., & Stewart, N. (2008). Using adobe flash lite on mobile phones for psychological research: Reaction time measurement reliability and interdevice variability. Behavior Research Methods, 40(4), 1170–1176. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.1170.

Rohendi, D. (2012). Developing e-learning based on animation content for improving mathematical connection abilities in high school students. International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI), 9(4), 1.

Salim, K., & Tiawa, D. H. (2015). The student’s perceptions of learning mathematics using flash animation secondary school in Indonesia. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(34), 76–80.

Sandström, M., Nilsson, L., & Lilja, J. (2013). Displaying mathematical literacy--pupils’ talk about mathematical activities. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 2(2), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v2n2p55.

Sembiring, R. K. (2010). Pendidikan matematika realistik Indonesia (PMRI): perkembangan dan tantangannya. IndoMS. J.M.E, 1(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.1.1.791.11-16.

Sugiyono. (2009). Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Syahbana, A. (2012). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa smp melalui pembelajaran contextual teaching and learning. EDUMATICA| Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.

Taylor, M. J., Pountney, D. C., & Baskett, M. (2008). Using animation to support the teaching of computer game development techniques. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1258–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.12.006.

Umbara, U. (2015). Efektivitas pembelajaran realistic mathematic education (RME) terhadap kemampuan representasi matematis siswa. JUMLAHKU: Jurnal Matematika Ilmiah STKIP Muhammadiyah Kuningan, 1(1).

Umbara, U. (2017). Psikolgi pembelajaran matematika (melaksanakan pembelajaran matematika berdasarkan tinjauan psikologi). Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Venkat, H., Graven, M., Lampen, E., Nalube, P., & Chitera, N. (2009). Reasoning and reflecting in mathematical literacy. Learning and Teaching Mathematics, 7, 47–53.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v5i2.1057

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Elemen

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons License
Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats