Students' mathematical argumentation ability when proving mathematical statements based on self-efficacy
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aberdein, A., & Dove, I. J. (2013). The Argument of Mathematics (A. Aberdein & I. J. Dove (eds.)). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6534-4
Alcock, L., & Weber, K. (2010). Undergraduates’ example use in proof construction: purposes and effectiveness. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 3(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2010.11790298
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
Budiyono. (2015). Pengantar penilaian hasil belajar [Introduction to assessment of learning outcomes]. UNS Press.
Dede, A. T. (2019). Arguments constructed within the mathematical modelling cycle. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(2), 292–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1501825
Fernández-León, A., Gavilán-Izquierdo, J. M., & Toscano, R. (2021). A case study of the practices of conjecturing and proving of research mathematicians. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(5), 767–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1717658
Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2016). Responsibility for proving and defining in abstract algebra class. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(5), 733–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1114159
Fukawa-Connelly, T., & Silverman, J. (2015). The development of mathematical argumentation in an unmoderated, asynchronous multi-user dynamic geometry environment. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 15, 445–488.
Gutiérrez, Á., Leder, G. C., & Boero, P. (2016). The Second Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-561-6
Hamdani, D., & Subarinah, S. (2020). Argumen deduktif mahasiswa dalam mengonstruksi bukti [Students’ deductive arguments in constructing evidence]. The 2th National Conference on Education, Social Science, and Humaniora Proceeding, 2(1), 21–32.
Indrawatiningsih, N., Purwanto, As’ari, A. R., & Sa’dijah, C. (2020). Mathematical argumentation ability: Error analysis in solving mathematical arguments. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 711–721. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.654460
Kwon, O. N., Bae, Y., & Oh, K. H. (2015). Design research on inquiry-based multivariable calculus: focusing on students’ argumentation and instructional design. ZDM, 47(6), 997–1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0726-z
Laamena, C. M., Nusantara, T., Irawan, E. B., & Muksar, M. (2018). How do the undergraduate students use an example in mathematical proof construction: A study based on argumentation and proving activity. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3836
Lesseig, K., & Hine, G. (2022). Teaching mathematical proof at secondary school: an exploration of pre-service teachers’ situative beliefs. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(9), 2465–2481. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1895338
Maslahah, Ni’matul, F., Abadi, A., & Maman, A. (2019). Analisis kemampuan pembuktian, kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan self-efficacy mahasiswa pendidikan matematika pada mata kuliah aljabar abstrak di yogyakarta [Analysis of proving ability, creative thinking ability and self-efficacy of mathematics educations. Tesis pada Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
Sadieda, L. U. (2019). Kemampuan argumentasi mahasiswa melalui model berpikir induktif dengan metode probing-prompting learning [Students’ argumentation skills through inductive thinking models with the probing-prompting learning method]. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v14i1.24038
Sears, R. (2019). Proof schemes of pre-service middle and secondary mathematics teachers. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 11(4), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2018.1467106
Septiati, E. (2021). Kemampuan mahasiswa dalam mengkonstruksi bukti matematis pada mata kuliah analisis real [Students’ ability to construct mathematical evidence in real analysis courses]. Indiktika : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.31851/indiktika.v4i1.6761
Sriraman, B., & Umland, K. (2020). Argumentation in mathematicseducation. In Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 63–66). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_11
Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Philosophy, 34(130).
Viholainen, A., Tossavainen, T., Viitala, H., & Johansson, M. (2019). University mathematics students’ self-efficacy beliefs about proof and proving. Lumat: International Journal of Math, Science and Technology Education, 7(1), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.7.1.406
Voica, C., Singer, F. M., & Stan, E. (2020). How are motivation and self-efficacy interacting in problem-solving and problem-posing? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 487–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10005-0
Zambak, V. S., & Magiera, M. T. (2020). Supporting grades 1–8 pre-service teachers’ argumentation skills: constructing mathematical arguments in situations that facilitate analyzing cases. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(8), 1196–1223. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1762938
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i2.15151
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Surya Kurniawan, Rizky Rosjanuardi, Suhendra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.