Pemecahan Masalah dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Jumping Task ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v6i2.1987Keywords:
cognitive style, jumping task, mathematical problem solvingAbstract
The provision of jumping tasks (JT) is an effort to improve students' problem-solving abilities. Descriptive qualitative research was conducted to describe and analyze students' ability to solve mathematical problems, both in the field-dependent cognitive style (FD) and independent field (FI). JT is a high-level question, C4-C6, in Bloom's taxonomy on the Three Variable Linear Equation System topic. The subjects in this study were students of class X MIPA 1 of SMA Negeri 4 Jember with 30 students consisting of 5 FD students and 25 FI students. The data collection method uses tests (JT questions) and interviews. The results showed the differences in FD and FI subjects' ability in the stages of carrying out the plan of completion and re-checking, i.e., the FI subject had better solving ability than the FD subject in the stage of planning the completion and re-checking. In contrast, at the other Polya stages, there were no differences.References
Afifah, D. S. N. & Nafi’an, M. I. (2017). Onto-semiotic approach profile of senior high school on cognive style in solving statistical problems. Proceeding of International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education (ICMSE) 2016. 3(1) 2017. 110-113.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan edisi 2. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Fahrudin, D. Mardiyana, & Pramudya. I (2019) The analysis of mathematic problem solving ability by polya steps on material trigonometric reviewed from self-regulated learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1254 (2019) 012076. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1254/1/012076.
Gordon, H. R. & Wyant, L. J. (1994). Cognitive style of selected international and domestic graduate students at Marshall University. Diakses dari http://eric.ed.gov/ericdocs/data/ ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/000019b/80/13/e8/ic.pdf pada 15 Januari 2019.
Hidayati, A. U. (2017). Melatih keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi dalam pembelajaran matematika pada siswa sekolah dasar. Terampil, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Dasar, 4(2), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.24042/terampil.v4i2.2222.
Hobri. (2020). Lesson study for learning community: penerapan dan riset dalam pembelajaran matematika. Yogyakarta: LaksBang PRESSindo.
Hobri, Ummah, I. K., Yuliati, N., & Dafik. (2020). The effect of jumping task based on creative problem solving on student's problem solving ability. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 387-406. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13126a.
Kaliky, Nurlaelah, E. & Aljupri. (2019). Analysis of mathematical problem solving ability students of junior high school to Polya model S H. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2019) 042064, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042064.
Krulik, S. & Rudnick, J. A. (1995). The new sourcebook for teaching reasoning and problem solving in elementary school. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
Lusiana, R. (2017). Analisis kesalahan mahasiswa dalam memecahkan masalah pada materi himpunan ditinjau dari gaya kognitif. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(1), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v10i1.1290.
Marwazi, M., Masrukan, M., & Putra, N. M. D. (2019). Analysis of problem solving ability based on field dependent cognitive style in discovery learning models. Journal of Primary Education, 8(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpe.v8i2.25451.
Nasrul, Hobri, & Oktavianingtyas, E. (2019). Analisis kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa sekolah menengah di Jember dalam menyelesaikan soal peluang pada pembelajaran berbasis lesson study learning community berdasarkan kecerdasan emosional. Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.19184/kdma.v10i1.11653.
Ninik, Hobri, & Suharto. (2014). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah untuk setiap tahap model Polya dari siswa SMK IBU Pakusari Jurusan Multimedia pada pokok bahasan program linier. Kadikma, 5(3), 61-68.
Nofrion. (2017). Peningkatan aktivitas belajar siswa melalui penerapan metode “jumping task†pada pembelajaran geografi. Jurnal Geografi, 9(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v9i1.6043.
Nur, A.S. & Palobo, M. (2018). Profil kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa ditinjau dari perbedaan gaya kognitif dan gender. Jurnal Matematika Kreatif – Inovatif, 9(2), 139-148.
OECD. (2019). Combined Executive Summaries PISA 2018. Paris: OECD. Diakses dari https://www. oecd.org/pisa/Combined_Executive_Summaries_PISA_2018.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiU-eXkpJfohVIWH0KHYPeBL4QFjAGegQIBBAP&usg pada 6 Desember 2019.
Panjaitan, B. (2018). The reflective abstraction profile of junior high school students in solving mathematical problems based on cognitive style of field independent and field dependent. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088(2018) 012094, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012094.
Panjaitan, M., & Rajagukguk, S. (2017). Upaya meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran problem based learning di kelas X SMA. Jurnal Inspiratif, 3(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpmi.v3i2.8880.
Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Prabawa, A. P. & Zaenuri. (2017). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari gaya kognitif siswa pada model project based learning bernuansa etnomatematika. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(1), 120-129.
Saiful, Susanto, & Hobri. (2019). The students’ metacognition analysis through jumping task based on lesson study for learning community. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,1265(1) 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1265/1/012002.
Sato, M, (2015). How do Teachres Turn to be Learning Professional? Lesson Study in School as Learning Community, Materi dalam Short Term on Lesson Study (STOLS) V for ITTEP (Institutes of Teachers Training and Education Personnel), 27 September sampai dengan 23 Oktober 2015. Tokyo: Japan International Cooperation Agency.
Shofia, E. A. L., Hobri, & Murtikusuma, R. P. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa pada materi aritmatika sosial berbasis jumping task ditinjau dari gaya kognitif field dependent dan field independent. Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(3), 171-182. https://doi.org/10.30659/kontinu.3.1.37-50.
Tambychik, T. & Meerah, T. S. (2010). Students’ difficulties in mathematics problem-solving: what do they say? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8(2010), 142-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020.
Tisngati, U. (2015). Proses berpikir reflektif mahasiswa dalam pemecahan masalah pada materi himpunan ditinjau dari gaya kognitif berdasarkan langkah Polya. Beta Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 8(2), 115–124.
Witkin, H., Moore C., Goodenough, D., & Cox, P. (1977). Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047001001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Elemen agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
