Pengembangan Soal Literasi Matematis untuk Mendukung Matematisasi Mahasiswa Calon Guru




Indonesian context, mathematical literacy problems, mathematisation, prospective mathematics teachers


Mathematisation ability of prospective teachers that was low in solving mathematical literacy problems needs serious attention. Therefore, to help prospective teachers do mathematization, they were employed by giving mathematical literacy problems. This study aims to produce mathematical literacy problems that were valid, practical, and have potential effects on the mathematization ability of prospective teacher students. The study was conducted using a design research type development study. Thirty students of prospective teachers in a private university in Sidoarjo became the subjects. Mathematical literacy problems’ qualities from this research should support prospective mathematics teachers in categorizing horizontal and verticalization activities. In addition, the problems were designed using the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) framework with the Indonesian context. The results suggested that the developed mathematical literacy problems could be categorized valid based on validators’ evaluation, practically based on the small group phase results, and have the potential effects were assessed from the results of student tests handed in field test phase using mathematical literacy problems. The test results showed that 78% of prospective mathematics teachers were in the good category of mathematization ability after using the developed problems. The developed mathematical literacy problem has a potential effect so that it can be used as an alternative question in lecturing higher education activities to support the mathematics of prospective teacher students.

Author Biography

Lestariningsih Lestariningsih, STKIP PGRI Sidoarjo

Mathematics Education


Abdullah, S. S. (2015). Mahasiswa (Calon) Guru Matematika yang Profesional. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY 2015, 1(Pendidikan Matematika), 721–726.

Biccard, P., & Wessels, D. (2015). Student mathematical activity as a springboard to developing teacher didactisation practices. Pythagoras, 36(2), 1–9.

Biccard, P., & Wessels, D. (2017). Developing Mathematisation Practices in Primary Mathematics Teaching through Didactisation- Based Teacher Development. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(1), 61–73.

de Lange, J. (1987). Mathematics, insight and meaning. Utrecht: OW&OC.

Disnawati, H., & Nahak, S. (2019). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa Berbasis Etnomatematika Tenun Timor pada Materi Pola Bilangan. Jurnal Elemen, 5(1), 64.

Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Faculty of Sciences, Freudenthal Institute, 13(3), 200 pp. Retrieved from

Lange, Jan de. (2006). Mathematical Literacy For Living From OECD-PISA. Tsukuba Journal of Educational Study in Mathematics, 25(September), 13–35.

Lestariningsih, L. Amin, S.M., Lukito, A., & Lutfianto, M. (2017). Mathematisation of female student teachers with high mathematics ability in solving mathematical literacy problem with personal context. Proceeding of the 1st Mathematics, Informatics, Science, and Education International Conference (MISEIC) 2017.

Lestariningsih, L., Amin, S. ., Lukito, A., & Lutfianto, M. (2018a). Mathematisation of Preservice Teacher in Solving Higher Order Thinking Problem. 160(Incomed 2017), 291–294.

Lestariningsih, L., Amin, S. M., Lukito, A., & Lutfianto, M. (2018b). Students’ Mathematisation in Solving Mathematical Literacy Problems with Space and Shape Contents. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108(1), 0–7.

Mahfudhoh, R., Susanto, & Trapsilasiwi, D. (2017). Pengembangan Soal Pelevelan Literasi Matematika Konteks Personal untuk Siswa Kelas VIII SMP. Kadikma, 8(3), 58–67.

Niss, M. (2010). Modeling a crucial aspect of students’ mathematical modeling. Modeling Students’ Mathematical Modeling Competencies: ICTMA 13, 43–59.

OECD. (2006). Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy. In Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy.

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework MAtheMAtIcS, ReAdIng, ScIence, PRobleM SolvIng And FInAncIAl lIteRAcy. In Echinoderms: Durham - Proceedings of the 12th International Echinoderm Conference.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework. In Evolution.

Patnani, M. (2013). Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Problem Solving pada mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikogenesis, 1(2), 185–198.

Pulungan, D. A. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Literasi Matematika Model PISA. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 3(2), 74–78.

Roux, S. (2010). Forms of Mathematization ( 14th-17th Centuries ). Early Science and Medicine, 15, 319–337.

Stillman, G., & Brown, J. P. (2014). Evidence of implemented anticipation in mathematising by beginning modellers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 763–789.

Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations: Improving the Quality of Education and Training. In Kogan Page.

Winter. (2013). Mathematics content or contextual understandings: Issues of primacy in South African mathematical literacy classrooms. In Papanikos, G.T. (Ed.),. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual International Conference on Mathematics Education & Statistics Education, Mathematics and Statistics. Athens, Greece.

Zulkardi. (2006). Formative Evaluation: what, why, when and how. Oocities. Retrieved from

Zulkardi, & Putri, R. (2010). Mendesain sendiri soal kontekstual matematika. Prosiding KNM13 Semarang, 1–7.




How to Cite

Lestariningsih, L., & Lutfianto, M. (2021). Pengembangan Soal Literasi Matematis untuk Mendukung Matematisasi Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Jurnal Elemen, 7(1), 195–208.




Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.