Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gaya Belajar Menurut David Kolb
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v5i2.928Keywords:
communication ability, learning style, mathematical learning, a theory of David KolbAbstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the distribution of student learning styles according to David Kolb's classification, to learn the average mathematical communication skills that have diverger learning styles, assimilators, convergers and accommodators, and to know whether or not there are significant differences in mathematical communication skills between students has a learning style diverger, assimilator, converger and accommodator. This research was conducted in MAN 2 Cirebon. The instruments used were the Learning style inventory (LSI) and mathematical communication skills tests. This type of research is a comparative study with a quantitative approach. Based on the results of data processing, the distribution of student learning styles included in diverger learning styles was 17% of students, assimilators were 27% of students, converger was 20% of students, and accommodators were 36% students. Using a scale of 0-50, the average mathematical communication ability of students is 28.63. Whereas when viewed from each distribution of learning styles, the ordinary mathematical communication skills of students diverger 12.80, students assimilator 32.88, student converger 44.17, and accommodator students 24.27. Based on the results of the analysis with the ANOVA test that there is a significant difference in students' mathematical communication skills between the learning style diverger, assimilator, converger and accommodator with a significant level of α = 5%.References
Anintya, Y. A., Pujiastuti, E., & Mashuri. (2017). Analisis kemampuan komunikasi matematis ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa kelas VIII pada model pembelajaran Resource Based Learning. UJME, 6(1), 37-43.
Atkins, H., Moore, D., Hobbs, D., & Sharpe, S. (2001). Learning style theory and computer mediated communication. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 71-75). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Auliana, N. (2017). Analisis kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa pada materi statistika ditinjau dari gaya belajar Visual, Auditorial, Kinestetik (VAK). Simki-Techsain, 01(06), 1-8.
Baur, N., & Lamnek, S. (2007). Multivariate analysis. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, 1-3. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosm133.
Baxter, J. A., Woodward, J., & Olson, D. (2005). Writing in mathematics: an alternative form of communication for academically lowâ€achieving students. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(2), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00127.x.
Beardsley, R. S., Kimberlin, C. L., & Tindall, W. N. (Eds.). (2012). Communication skills in pharmacy practice: a practical guide for students and practitioners. United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Brenner, M. (1994) 'A communication framework for mathematics: exemplary instruction for culturally and linguistically diverse students', in McLeod, B. (ed), Language and Learning: Educating Linguistically Diverse Students, Albany, NY, SUNY Press.
Depdiknas. (2006). Permendiknas No. 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
DePorter, B., & Hernacki, M. (1992). Quantum learning. Bandung: PT Mizan Publika.
Dirman, & Juarsih, C. (2014). Karakteristik peserta didik dalam rangka implementasi standar proses pendidikan siswa. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Emzir. (2010). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan kuantitatif & kualitatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Hamidah, K. N., & Rosyidi, A. H. (2016). Profil penalaran matematika siswa SMP ditinjau dari gaya belajar Kolb. MATHEdunesa, 3(5), 210-219.
Herlina, S., Turmudi, & Dahlan, J. A. (2012). Efektivitas strategi react dalam upaya peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 17(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v17i1.221.
Jamaris, M. (2014). Kesulitan belajar: perspektif, asesmen, dan penanggulangannya bagi anak usia dini dan usia sekolah. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Jr., A. G., & Reyes, J. D. (2017). Exploring mathematics achievement goals using Kolb’s learning style model. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1), 19-24.
Kablan, Z., & Kaya, S. (2013). Science achievement in TIMSS cognitive domains based on learning styles. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 97-114. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2013.53.6.
Kaur, B. & Lam, T.T. (Eds.). (2012). Reasoning, communication and connections in mathematics. Singapore: World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814405430_0001.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of management learning & education, 4(2), 193-212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566.
Kolb, D. A. (1981). Experiential learning theory and the learning style inventory: A reply to Freedman and Stumpf. Academy of Management Review, 6(2), 289-296. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1981.4287844.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Mainemelis, C., Boyatzis, R. E., & Kolb, D. A. (2002). Learning styles and adaptive flexibility: Testing experiential learning theory. Management learning, 33(1), 5-33.
Marković, S., & Jovanović, N. (2012). Learning style as a factor which affects the quality of e-learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 38(4), 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-011-9253-7.
Muhson, A. (2006). Teknik analisis kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Musfah, J. (2012). Pendidikan holistik: pendekatan lintas perspektif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Nasution. (2013). Berbagai pendekatan dalam proses belajar dan mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Ng, K. Y., Van Dyne, L., & Ang, S. (2009). From experience to experiential learning: Cultural intelligence as a learning capability for global leader development. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(4), 511-526. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.8.4.zqr511.
Noviyanti, M. (2017). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP Kanisius Gayam Yogyakarta Kelas VII C Dalam Konteks Operasi Hitung Bentuk Aljabar. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Nowicki, S., & Duke, M. P. (1994). Individual differences in the nonverbal communication of affect: The Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy Scale. Journal of Nonverbal behavior, 18(1), 9-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02169077.
Peker, M., & Mirasyedioğlu, Ş. (2008). Pre-service elementary school teachers’ learning styles and attitudes towards mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75302.
Persada, A. R. (2014). Pengaruh pendekatan problem posing terhadap kemampuan komunikasi matematika siswa kelas VII. EduMa, 3(1), 32-51.
Purnama, I. L., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2016). Kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa ditinjau melalui model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe complete sentence dan team quiz. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.10.1.3267.26-41.
Reys, R., Reys, B., Lapan, R., Holliday, G., & Wasman, D. (2003). Assessing the impact of standards-based middle grades mathematics curriculum materials on student achievement. Journal for research in mathematics education, 74-95. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034700.
Shamir, O., Srebro, N., & Zhang, T. (2014). Communication-efficient distributed optimization using an approximate newton-type method. In International conference on machine learning (pp. 1000-1008).
Siregar, S. (2014). Statistik parametrik untuk penelitian kuantitatif. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Sukardi. (2015). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and applications, 5, 147-158. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.5.0.147-158.
Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematics of communication. Scientific American, 181(1), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0749-11.
Weiss, I., Kramarski, B., & Talis, S. (2006). Effects of multimedia environments on kindergarten children’s mathematical achievements and style of learning. Educational Media International, 43(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980500490513.
Winarso, W. (2015). Perbedaan tipe kepribadian terhadap sikap belajar matematika siswa kelas X SMA Islam Al-Azhar 5 Cirebon. Sainsmat, 4(1). 67-80.
Winarso, W. (2018). Authentic assessment for academic performance; study on the attitudes, skills, and knowledge of grade 8 mathematics students. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v1i1.579.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Elemen agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
