Exploring EFL Teacher's Reflective Practice toward Autonomy-Supportive Instructional Behavior in EFL Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v7i3.21335Keywords:
Reflective practice, Autonomy-supportive instructional behavior, EFL context, Education level, Narrative inquiryAbstract
This study explores teachers' reflective practices on instructional behaviors supporting autonomy in EFL classroom teaching. This study used the narrative inquiry method, where the researcher used teacher’s stories based on their experiences as data. Participants in this study were purposively selected based on the numerous of teaching experience in the EFL context. Semi-structured interviews and classroom observations were conducted to collect data. The data were analyzed through interactive model analysis. The finding shows that the higher level of education the less Autonomy-supportive instructional behavior was implemented by the teacher since the teacher considered that the higher a student’s level of education, the more they have the capability to determine their learning. While ASIB (Autonomy-supportive instructional behavior) highly influence on student satisfaction, it influences student motivation and a slight effect on student academic achievement for tertiary level. The differences in the implementation of ASIB should focus on pedagogical strategies that appropriate implemented in certain level of education rather than eliminating some ASIB because teachers think certain levels of education do not need autonomy support in learning.
References
Alrabai, F. (2021). The Influence of Autonomy-Supportive Teaching on EFL Students’ Classroom Autonomy: An Experimental Intervention. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(September). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.728657
Alwasidi, A., & Alnaeem, L. (2022). EFL University Teachers’ Beliefs About Learner Autonomy and the Effect of Online Learning Experience. English Language Teaching, 15(6), 135. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n6p135
Artini, L. P., Nitiasih, P. K., & Wirapatni, A. A. I. S. (2022). Learner autonomy amid COVID-19 outbreak: Insights from EFL teachers’ beliefs. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 43(3), 741–748. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2022.43.3.28
Barkhuizen, G., Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2014). Narrative Inquiry in Language Teaching. In Routledge.
Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and Researching Autonomy (C. N. C. & D. R. Hall (ed.); 2nd ed.). Routledge.
Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 66(3), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr065
Burns, C., & Chopra, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the effect of industry engagement on student learning in undergraduate programs. The Journal of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering, 33(1). https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jtmae/article/id/14128/
Cheung, H. Y. (2008). Measuring the professional identity of Hong Kong in‐service teachers. Journal of In‐service Education, 34(3), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580802003060
Chik, A., & Benson, P. (2021). Commentary: Digital language and learning in the time of coronavirus. Linguistics and Education, 62, 100873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100873
Cirocki, A., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2019). Professional development of secondary school EFL teachers: Voices from Indonesia. System, 85, 102111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102111
Derakhshan, A., Arabmofrad, A., & Taghizadeh, M. (2020). Investigating the Effects of English Language Teachers’ Professional Identity and Autonomy in Their Success. Issues in Language Teaching, 9(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2020.52263.496
Dewey, J. (1930). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. 434. http://books.google.com/books?id=tfUvXujrJHEC&pgis=1
Ding, F., & Yu, B. (2022). First year university students’ perception of autonomy: an individualistic approach. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1905154
Ellis, K. (2000). Perceived teacher confirmation. The development and validation of an instrument and two studies of the relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Human Communication Research, 26(2), 264–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00758.x
Farrell, T. S. C., & Ives, J. (2015). Exploring teacher beliefs and classroom practices through reflective practice: A case study. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 594–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541722
Goldman, Z. W., & Goodboy, A. K. (2014). Making students feel better: Examining the relationships between teacher confirmation and college students’ emotional outcomes. Communication Education, 63(3), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2014.920091
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. routledge.
Jeno, L. M., Nylehn, J., Hole, T. N., Raaheim, A., Velle, G., & Vandvik, V. (2023). Motivational determinants of students’ academic functioning: The role of autonomy-support, autonomous motivation, and perceived competence. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(2), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1990125
Korthagen, F. A. J. (1993). Two modes of reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(3), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(93)90046-J
Lengkanawati, N. S. (2017). Learner autonomy in the indonesian efl settings. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v6i2.4847
Little, D. (1996). Freedom to learn and compulsion to interact: promoting learner autonomy through the use of information systems and information technologies. In Pemberton, Li, Or, and Pierson. Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning, 1, 203–218. Hongkong University Press.
Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2019). Promoting growth in foreign and second language education: A research agenda for mindsets in language learning and teaching. System, 86, 102126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102126
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nakata, Y. (2011). Teachers’ readiness for promoting learner autonomy: A study of Japanese EFL high school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 900–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.03.001
Okada, R. (2021). Effects of Perceived Autonomy Support on Academic Achievement and Motivation Among Higher Education Students: A Meta-Analysis. Japanese Psychological Research, 65(3), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12380
Okada, R. (2023). Effects of perceived autonomy support on academic achievement and motivation among higher education students: A meta‐analysis. Japanese Psychological Research, 65(3), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12380
Orakci, Ş., & Durnali, M. (2023). The mediating effects of metacognition and creative thinking on the relationship between teachers’ autonomy support and teachers’ self‐efficacy. Psychology in the Schools, 60(1), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22770
Orakcı, Ş. (2021). Exploring the relationships between cognitive flexibility, learner autonomy, and reflective thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100838
Oxford, R. L. (2015). Expanded perspectives on autonomous learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2014.995765
Ozer, O., & Yukselir, C. (2023). ‘Am I aware of my roles as a learner?’ the relationships of learner autonomy, self-direction and goal commitment to academic achievement among Turkish EFL learners. Language Awareness, 32(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1936539
Pennington, M. C. (1992). Reflecting on teaching and learning: A developmental focus for the second language classroom. Perspectives on Second Language Teacher Education, 47–65.
Puspitasari, P. I., Suwastini, N. K. A., Blangsinga, G. W. K. A. A., Dantes, G. R., & Tuerah, I. J. C. (2021). Boomers’ perception towards the implementation of online learning amidst Covid-19 outbreak. 2nd International Conference on Technology and Educational Science (ICTES 2020), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210407.226
Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2021). Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1862657
Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge university press.
Ryan, R M, & Deci, E. L. (2017). School as contexts for learning and social development. Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness, 351–381.
Ryan, Richard M, & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Sumardi, S., & Nugrahani, D. (2021). Adaptation to emergency remote teaching: Pedagogical strategy for pre-service language teachers amid COVID-19 pandemic. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.906553
Syafryadin, Suherdi, D., Nadya, N. L., Harahap, A., & Astrid, A. (2022). Teacher readiness and challenges in creating learner autonomy in ICT-based English learning activities. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 708–717. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i3.34667
Tarrayo, V. N., Paz, R. M. O., & Gepila Jr, E. C. (2023). The shift to flexible learning amidst the pandemic: the case of English language teachers in a Philippine state university. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1944163
Todd, A. R., & Galinsky, A. D. (2014). Perspective‐taking as a strategy for improving intergroup relations: Evidence, mechanisms, and qualifications. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(7), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12116
Tuan, D. M. (2021). Learner autonomy in English language learning: Vietnamese EFL students’ perceptions and practices. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i2.29605
Villamizar, A. G., & Mejía, G. (2019). Fostering learner autonomy and critical reflection through digital video-journals in a university foreign language course. Reflective Practice, 20(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2019.1575195
Zarrinabadi, N., Lou, N. M., & Shirzad, M. (2021). Autonomy support predicts language mindsets: Implications for developing communicative competence and willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms. Learning and Individual Differences, 86(April 2020), 101981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.101981
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the VELES Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
VELES Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
