Asynchronous Video Feedback as a Game-Changer for Online Speaking Classes

Authors

  • Arinas Sabila Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Bambang Yudi Cahyono Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Mirjam Anugerahwati Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i2.24708

Keywords:

Asynchronous Video Feedback, English language learning, speaking skills, online learning

Abstract

Asynchronous Video Feedback (AVF) allows students to replay or slow down video feedback for better comprehension, enabling them to thoroughly process and address issues, thereby enhancing their observational and reasoning skills. This study investigates the effectiveness and student perceptions of AVF in improving speaking skills in online English courses. Conducted in an online English course in Pare, Kediri, Indonesia, the research employed a mixed-methods design, including pretests, post-tests, surveys, and semi-structured interviews with eight participants from an online speaking class. The results revealed substantial improvements in learning outcomes, with the pretest mean score of 64.88 increasing to a posttest mean score of 84.88, indicating a significant enhancement in students' speaking capabilities. The study showed that AVF significantly improved pronunciation, grammar, vocabulary, and fluency. Additionally, AVF promotes self-directed learning and discipline, though a student's educational background may influence their comprehension, particularly concerning grammar. Compared to in-class feedback, AVF reduces feelings of embarrassment and fear, offering valuable insights for future online English classes. Therefore, AVF is proposed as an effective tool for developing students' speaking abilities in online courses.

References

Abbaspour, F. (2016). Speaking Competence and its components: A review of literature. Journal of Research in Linguistics, Language Teaching and Testing, 1(4), 144–152.

Alonzo, A. C. (2018). An argument for formative assessment with science learning progressions. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(2), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2017.1408630

Belt, E. S., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2021). Video Use in Online and Blended Courses: A Qualitative Synthesis Video Use in Online and Blended Courses: A Qualitative Synthesis. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1954882

Bobo, L., & Andrews, A. (2010). Using video feedback to measure self-efficacy. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1096947

Borup, J., West, R. E., & Thomas, R. (2015). The impact of text versus video communication on instructor feedback in blended courses. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(2), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9367-8

Cassano, G., & Di Blas, N. (2024). A tool to support Students-to-Teacher feedback in asynchronous online contexts. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 585–593. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2023.3273109

Cavaleri, M., Kawaguchi, S., Di Biase, B., & Power, C. (2019). How recorded audio-visual feedback can improve academic language support. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(4), 6. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.16.4.6

Cheng, D., & Li, M. (2020). Screencast video feedback in online TESOL classes. Computers and Composition, 58, 102612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102612

Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. J. S. (2020). Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students’ perspective. 12(24), 10367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed). SAGE Publications.

Crook, A., Mauchline, A., Maw, S., Lawson, C., Drinkwater, R., Lundqvist, K., Orsmond, P., Gomez, S., & Park, J. (2012). The Use of Video Technology for Providing Feedback to Students: Can It Enhance the Feedback Experience for Staff and Students? Computers & Education, 58(1), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.025

Cunningham, K. J. (2019). Student perceptions and use of technology-mediated text and screencast feedback in ESL writing. Computers and Composition, 52, 222–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.02.003

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2015). Video-based feedback on student assessment: scarily personal. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1878

Hojeij, Z., & Baroudi, S. J. I. i. E. R. (2018). Student perceptions on peer feedback training using a blended method: A UAE case. 28(3), 655-678. doi/abs/10.3316/ielapa.864059533726310

Kusumawardani, S. A., & Mardiyani, E. (2018). The correlation between English grammar competence and speaking fluency. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 1(6), 724. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v1i6.p724-733

Lamey, A. (2015). Video feedback in philosophy. Metaphilosophy, 46(4–5), 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12155

Li, Y., & Walsh, S. (2023). Technology-enhanced reflection and teacher development: A student teacher's journey. RELC Journal, 54(2), 356-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231161153

Lestari, N. (2019). Improving the speaking skill by vlog (video blog) as learning media: The EFL students perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), Pages 915-925. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i1/5490

Mahoney, P., Macfarlane, S., & Ajjawi, R. (2019). A qualitative synthesis of video feedback in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(2), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1471457

Nikolic, S., Stirling, D., & Ros, M. (2018). Formative assessment to develop oral communication competency using YouTube: Self- and peer assessment in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(4), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1298569

Simpson, T., Holden, K., Merrick, D., Dawson, S., & Bedford, L. (2019). Does video feedback & peer observation offer a valid method of reinforcing oral presentation training for undergraduate biochemists? Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 262–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1587717

Thomas, R. A., West, R. E., & Borup, J. (2017). An analysis of instructor social presence in online text and asynchronous video feedback comments. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.003

Thompson, R., & Lee, M. J. (2012). Talking with students through screencasting: experimentations with video feedback to improve student learning. SIAS Faculty Publications, 1(1). https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/ias_pub/229/

Tripp, T., & Rich, P. (2012). Using video to analyze one's own teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 678-704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01234.x

Tseng, S.-S., & Yeh, H.-C. (2019). The Impact of Video and Written Feedback on Student Preferences of English Speaking Practice. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44687

Wafubwa, R. (2020). Role of formative assessment in improving students’ motivation: a systematic review of literature. The international journal of assessment and evaluation, 28(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7920/CGP/v28i01/17-31

Walter, N., Ortbach, K., & Niehaves, B. (2015). Designing electronic feedback – Analyzing the effects of social presence on perceived feedback usefulness. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 76, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.12.001

Yoon, J. (2021). Students’perception of blended asynchronous and synchronous learning in an advanced spanish conversation class. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v5i6.4065

Zulhermindra, Z., & Hadiarni, H. (2020). Improving students’ public speaking skills through the use of videotaped feedback. Ta’dib, 23(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v23i1.2008

Downloads

Published

2024-08-26

How to Cite

Sabila, A., Cahyono, B. Y., & Anugerahwati, M. (2024). Asynchronous Video Feedback as a Game-Changer for Online Speaking Classes. Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i2.24708

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): August 2024

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Arinas Sabila, Bambang Yudi Cahyono, Mirjam Anugerahwati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with the VELES Journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Creative Commons License

VELES Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.