Shaping self-efficacy in online mathematics: A comparative study by gender and semester level
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v11i3.29689Keywords:
academic semester, distance education, gender, mathematics education, online learning, self-efficacyAbstract
Self-efficacy plays an important role in online mathematics learning, especially because the process demands a high level of independence and self-regulation. However, few studies have explored how sources of self-efficacy may differ based on gender and academic stage in the context of distance education. This study aimed to examine whether there are significant differences across five sources of self-efficacy–mastery experience, vicarious experience, social persuasion, physiological state, and belief–based on students’ gender and academic semester. A total of 104 students from the Mathematics Education program at Universitas Terbuka participated in this study. As the data did not meet the normality assumptions, the Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used. The results showed no significant differences between male and female students across any of the self-efficacy dimensions. However, the academic semester revealed significant differences in two dimensions: social persuasion and belief, with middle-semester students scoring the highest. This implies that self-efficacy support strategies should be tailored to students' academic stages. Those in early semesters may benefit more from peer modelling and encouragement, while those nearing graduation may need more support to manage academic stress. Future studies should involve more diverse samples to validate these results.
References
Ali, R., & Leeds, E. M. (2009). The impact of face-to-face orientation on online retention: A pilot study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(4).
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Cho, M. H., & Jonassen, D. (2009). Development of the human interaction dimension of the self-regulated learning questionnaire in asynchronous online learning environments. Educational Psychology, 29(1), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410802516934
Cho, M. H., Shen, D., & Laffey, J. (2010). The role of metacognitive self-regulation (MSR) on social presence and sense of community in online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 21(3), 297–316.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (fifth edition). Sage publications.
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGEPublications.
Florjančič, V. (2022). The challenges of distance assessment in higher education-a case study. Int. J. Learning Technology, 17(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2022.123685
Fuzi, S. F., Jama, S. R., Zainudin, S. N., Halim, B. A., Zahidi, N. E., Jusoh, N., Hassan, W. H. W., & Author, C. (2024). Impact of self-efficacy and self-regulated learning on satisfaction and academic performance in online learning. Information Management and Business Review, 16(3), 105–117.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Allyn and Bacon.
Hodges, C. B. (2008). Self-efficacy in the context of online learning environments: A review of the literature and directions for research. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(3–4), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.20001
Hollander, M., Wolfe, D. A., & Chicken, E. (2013). Nonparametric statistical methods (third). John Wiley & Sons.
Huang, C. (2013). Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0097-y
Julaihi, N. H., Zainuddin, P. F. A., Che Md Nor, R., Ahmad Bakri, S. R., Hamdan, A., Salleh, J., & Bujang, N. (2022). Self-efficacy in learning mathematics online. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 8(1), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.4435.2022
Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D. (2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2013.01.005
Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y
Li, J., & Wang, C. (2024). Measuring chinese english as a foreign language learners’ self-efficacy in vocabulary learning: Instrument development and validation. Education Sciences, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060671
Luo, Y., Gao, W., & Liu, X. (2022). Longitudinal relationship between self-esteem and academic self-efficacy among college students in china: Evidence from a cross-lagged model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877343
Mubarrak, K. R., Ihsan, H., & Wyandini, D. Z. (2022). Development of math efficacy scale for junior high school student in Indonesia. Jurnal Elemen, 8(1), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v8i1.4522
Muljana, P. S., & Luo, T. (2019). Factors contributing to student retention in online learning and recommended strategies for improvement: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18, 19–57. https://doi.org/10.28945/4182
Nahlati, N., Adi Widodo, S., & Matematika, P. (2023). Analisis kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa SMP ditinjau dari self-efficacy pada model pembelajaran SQ4R dengan project assessment [Analysis of junior high school students' mathematical communication skills in terms of self-efficacy in the SQ4R learning model with project assessment]. HEXAGON: Jurnal Ilmu dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.33830/hexagon.v1i2.5486
Nurhayati, H., Hasanah, A., & Dasari, D. (2025). The impact of mathematical disposition and self-efficacy beliefs on secondary school students’ mathematical literacy. Jurnal Elemen, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v11i1.26873
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Ready to learn: Vol. III. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201170-en
OECD. (2015). The ABC of gender equality in education: Aptitude, behavior, confidence. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264229945-en
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge.
Pitsia, V., Biggart, A., & Karakolidis, A. (2017). The role of students’ self-beliefs, motivation and attitudes in predicting mathematics achievement: A multilevel analysis of the programme for international student assessment data. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2017.03.014
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 144, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
Sang, S. (2023). Students’ online learning satisfaction, self-efficacy and academic performance. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 7(1), 648–656. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/7/2022998
Shell, D. F., Murphy, C. C., & Bruning, R. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.1.91
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.09.002
Vatou, A., Gregoriadis, A., Evagelou-Tsitiridou, M., Manolitsis, G., Mouzaki, A., Kypriotaki, M., Oikonomidis, V., Lemos, A., Piedade, F., Alves, D., Cadima, J., Michael, D., Charalambous, V., Agathokleous, A., Vrasidas, C., & Grammatikopoulos, V. (2024). Cross-cultural validation of teachers’ social self-efficacy scale: Insights from Cyprus, Greece, and Portugal. Education Sciences, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080840
Warren, L., Reilly, D., Herdan, A., & Lin, Y. (2021). Self-efficacy, performance and the role of blended learning. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-08-2019-0210
Whitcomb, K. M., Yasemin Kalender, Z., Nokes-Malach, T. J., Schunn, C. D., & Singh, C. (2020). A mismatch between self-efficacy and performance: Undergraduate women in engineering tend to have lower self-efficacy despite earning higher grades than men. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 1996–2014. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.06006
Wu, C. W., & Shein, P. P. (2025). Promoting gender equity in an information technology course through 6E-oriented STEM instruction on Health and Well-Being. Research in Science and Technological Education, 43(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2025.2519586
Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2013). The impact of online learning on students’ course outcomes: Evidence from a large community and technical college system. Economics of Education Review, 37, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.08.001
Yokoyama, S. (2019). Academic self-efficacy and academic performance in online learning: A mini review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02794
Yokoyama, S. (2024). Impact of academic self-efficacy on online learning outcomes: A recent literature review. EXCLI Journal, 23, 960–966. https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2024-7502
Zheng, G., Zhang, Q., & Ran, G. (2023). The association between academic stress and test anxiety in college students: The mediating role of regulatory emotional self-efficacy and the moderating role of parental expectations. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1008679
Zhu, C. (2019). Self-efficacy and self-esteem in online learning environments of adult learners. Int. J. Learning Technology, 14(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2019.100610
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Suci Nurhayati, Mery Noviyanti, Liana Mohamad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Elemen agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
