Unveiling students’ cognitive patterns in word problem solving: The case of single-variable linear equations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v11i4.30786Keywords:
cognitive profile, linear equation, mathematical thinking, metacognition, problem solving, word problemAbstract
Students often struggle to transfer their procedural knowledge of linear equations into meaningful solutions when faced with word problems, revealing a persistent gap in integrating conceptual understanding, strategic reasoning, and metacognitive evaluation. This study investigates students’ cognitive profiles in solving mathematical word problems involving single-variable linear equations. Grounded in a synthesized framework from Polya’s heuristic model and the NCTM problem-solving process, the research focuses on five cognitive stages: understanding, analyzing, strategizing, executing, and evaluating. Using a qualitative descriptive method, data were collected from 30 eighth-grade students through written tasks and semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate strong performance in problem comprehension; however, there was a notable decline in evaluation and reflection stages. Interview data revealed that low-performing students often lacked conceptual understanding and demonstrated limited metacognitive awareness, whereas high performers integrated conceptual, procedural, and reflective thinking. This study highlights the gap between procedural fluency and strategic reasoning across performance levels, emphasizing the need for instructional approaches that integrate metacognitive scaffolding to enhance problem-solving competence. A diagnostic framework is proposed to support teachers in identifying and addressing students' cognitive needs.
References
Agusfianuddin, A., Herman, T., & Turmudi, T. (2024). Difficulties in mathematical language and representation among elementary school students when solving word problems. Jurnal Elemen, 10(3), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v10i3.25814
Albay, E. M. (2020). Towards a 21st Century Mathematics Classroom: Investigating the Effects of the Problem-Solving Approach Among Tertiary Education Students. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.59588/2350-8329.1303
Alias, N. H., Shahrill, M., Nurhasanah, F., & Adnan, M. (2024). Effects of Virtual Algebra Tiles on the Performance of Year 8 Students in Solving Algebraic Linear Equations. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 175–192. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijmme.v2i3.1067
Angraini, L. M., Larsari, V. N., Muhammad, I., & Kania, N. (2023). Generalizations and analogical reasoning of junior high school viewed from bruner’s learning theory. 12, 291–306.
Braithwaite, D. W., & Sprague, L. (2021). Conceptual Knowledge, Procedural Knowledge, and Metacognition in Routine and Nonroutine Problem Solving. Cognitive Science, 45(10). https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13048
Clark, R. M., Guldiken, R., Kaw, A., & Uyanik, O. (2024). The case for metacognition support in a flipped STEM course. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190241255113
Díaz, V. (2022). Design and Validation of a Test for the Types of Mathematical Problems Associated with Reading Comprehension. Education Sciences, 12(11), 795. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110795
Fayakuun, M., & Agoestanto, A. (2023). Research trends on flipped classrooms of mathematics creative thinking, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. Jurnal Elemen, 9(2), 558–577. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i2.15150
Fitriati, F., & Marlaini, M. (2020). Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa melalui Model Belajar PBL Berbasis Rich Task Matematika [Cultivating Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Skills through the Rich Task-Based PBL Learning Model. Numeracy, 7(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v7i1.996
García-Pérez, D., Fraile, J., & Panadero, E. (2021). Learning strategies and self-regulation in context: how higher education students approach different courses, assessments, and challenges. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(2), 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00488-z
Geraci, L., Kurpad, N., Tirso, R., Gray, K. N., & Wang, Y. (2023). Metacognitive errors in the classroom: The role of variability of past performance on exam prediction accuracy. Metacognition and Learning, 18(1), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09326-7
Hancock, E., & Karakok, G. (2021). Supporting the Development of Process-Focused Metacognition During Problem-Solving. PRIMUS, 31(8), 837–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2020.1772914
Harahap, A. N., Bentri, A., Musdi, E., Yerizon, Y., & Armiati, A. (2024). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skills in solving mathematics problems in terms of students’ initial ability. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v7i1.18014
Hartelt, T., & Martens, H. (2024). Self-regulatory and metacognitive instruction regarding student conceptions: influence on students’ self-efficacy and cognitive load. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1450947
Ida, S., Aziz, R., & Irawan, W. H. (2021). Critical and Creative Thinking Skills to Solving Math Story Problems in Elementary School Students. Jurnal Tatsqif, 19(2), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v19i2.4069
Irianti, N. P. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Langkah-Langkah Polya [Analysis of Students' Reasoning Ability in Solving Mathematical Problems Based on Polya's Steps. MUST: Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology, 5(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.30651/must.v5i1.3622
Irmayanti, R., Pasaribu, L. H., Rahma, I. F., & Nazliah, R. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Penalaran dan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa [Analysis of the Ability to Solve Story Problems Reviewed from Students' Mathematical Reasoning and Communication Abilities. Numeracy, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v7i2.1205
Ismail, H. H., Duskri, M., Zubainur, C. M., & Munzir, S. (2018). Analysis of Student Ability in Solving PISA-Like Math Problems: a case study in SMPN 8 Banda Aceh, Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v6i12.m01
Jimenez, B., Root, J., Shurr, J., & Bouck, E. C. (2024). Using the Four Stages of Learning to Assess, Set Goals, and Instruct. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 56(6), 452–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599211054873
Jupri, A., & Drijvers, P. (2016). Student Difficulties in Mathematizing Word Problems in Algebra. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1299a
Kania, N., Fitriani, C., & Bonyah, E. (2023). Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Based on Prior Knowledge Mathematics. International Journal of Contemporary Studies in Education (IJ-CSE, 2(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijcse.v2i1.248
Kania, N., & Juandi, D. (2023). Does self-concept affect mathematics learning achievement. ?, 17(3), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i3.20554
Kania, N., Kusumah, Y. S., Dahlan, J. A., Nurlaelah, E., Gürbüz, F., & Bonyah, E. (2024). Constructing and providing content validity evidence through the Aiken’s V index based on the experts’ judgments of the instrument to measure mathematical problem-solving skills. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education, 10(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v10i1.71032
Kellman, P. J., Massey, C. M., & Son, J. Y. (2010). Perceptual Learning Modules in Mathematics: Enhancing Students’ Pattern Recognition, Structure Extraction, and Fluency. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(2), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01053.x
Kholid, M. N., Sa'Dijah, C., Hidayanto, E., & Permadi, H. (2022). Students’ reflective thinking pattern changes and characteristics of problem solving. Reflective Practice, 23(3), 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2021.2025353
Kholid, M. N., Swastika, A., Ishartono, N., Nurcahyo, A., Tin Lam, T., Maharani, S., Ikram, M., Murniasih, T. R., Majid, M., Wijaya, A. P., & Pratiwi, E. (2022). Hierarchy of Students’ Reflective Thinking Levels in Mathematical Problem Solving. Acta Scientiae, 24(6), 24–59. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6883
Kim, H. (2020). Concreteness Fading Strategy: A Promising and Sustainable Instructional Model in Mathematics Classrooms. Sustainability, 12(6), 2211. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062211
Levin, M. (2018). Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge During Strategy Construction: A Complex Knowledge Systems Perspective. Cognition and Instruction, 36(3), 247–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1464003
Mondal, S., Khatua, D., Mandal, S., Prasad, D. K., & Sekh, A. A. (2025). BMWP: the first Bengali math word problems dataset for operation prediction and solving. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00243-7
Mutawah, M. A. A., Thomas, R., Eid, A., Mahmoud, E. Y., & Fateel, M. J. (2019). Conceptual Understanding, Procedural Knowledge and Problem-Solving Skills in Mathematics: High School Graduates Work Analysis and Standpoints. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.258.273
Novianti, P. V., & Aini, N. (2023). Investigasi Aktivitas Metakognisi Siswa SMP Perempuan dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita [Investigation of Metacognitive Activities of Female Junior High School Students in Solving Story Problems. Numeracy, 10(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v10i1.1896
Nufus, H., Muhandaz, R., Hasanuddin, N., E, A., R, F., J, R., Hayati, I. R., & Situmorang, D. D. B. (2024). Analyzing the students’ mathematical creative thinking ability in terms of self-regulated learning: How do we find what we are looking for? Heliyon, 10(3), 24871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24871
Nurutami, A., Riyadi, R., & Subanti, S. (2018, 2018). Identification of Mathematical Literacy Students Level 2, 3, 4 of Pisa Task Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Islam, http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0008523004230426
Olivares, D., Lupiáñez, J. L., & Segovia, I. (2021). Roles and characteristics of problem solving in the mathematics curriculum: a review. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(7), 1079–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1738579
Park, E., & Cheon, J. (2025). Exploring Debugging Challenges and Strategies Using Structural Topic Model: A Comparative Analysis of High and Low-Performing Students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(8), 1884–1906. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241291174
Prabandari, R. S., Nurhasanah, F., & Siswanto, S. (2024). Analyzing Student Creative Thinking with Wallas Theory. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 114–127. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijmme.v2i2.1056
Pradestya, R., Imswatama, A., & Siti Balkist, P. (2020). Analisis kemampuan kognitif pada langkah-langkah pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari kecerdasan logis-matematis [Analysis of cognitive abilities in problem solving steps viewed from the perspective of logical-mathematical intelligence. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v5i1.1723
Prasetya, A., Fatichah, C., & Yuhana, U. L. (2019). Parsing struktur semantik soal cerita matematika berbahasa indonesia menggunakan recursive neural network [Parsing the semantic structure of Indonesian language mathematical story problems using recursive neural networks. Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 5(2), 118. https://doi.org/10.26594/register.v5i2.1537
Radovan, M. (2019). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of key competency “learning to learn. Pedagogika, 133(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2019.133.2
Rohimah, S. M., Darhim, D., & Juandi, D. (2022). A local instructional theory (LIT) for teaching linear equation through STEM instruction. Jurnal Elemen, 8(2), 340–351. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v8i2.4727
Ruamba, M. Y., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Rochmad, & Asih, T. S. N. (2024). Representation Process of Prospective Teachers in Solving Mathematical Problems Based on Cognitive Style. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 24(5). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i5.6998
Sanders, M., Kwok, M., & Gooden, M. (2025). What makes a math word problem solvable and clear? An analysis of pre-service teachers’ two-step problem posing. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 80, 101267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2025.101267
Schreiber, I. (2025). Teaching mathematical word problem-solving in middle school: teachers’ knowledge and their associated self-efficacy and beliefs. Discover Education, 4(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00479-6
Shaikh, S., Daudpotta, S. M., & Imran, A. S. (2021). Bloom’s Learning Outcomes’ Automatic Classification Using LSTM and Pretrained Word Embeddings. IEEE Access, 9, 117887–117909. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3106443
Shi, Y., & Qu, S. (2022). The effect of cognitive ability on academic achievement: The mediating role of self-discipline and the moderating role of planning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1014655
Sigus, H., & Mädamürk, K. (2025). Students’ motivation as a mediator between extra-mathematical knowledge and word problem-solving. Discover Education, 4(1), 172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00595-3
Susilo, F. J., Usodo, B., & Sari, D. (2023). The Profile of High-order Thinking Skills of Junior High School Students. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.56855//ijmme.v1i1.266
Szabo, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Guncaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of Problem-Solving Strategies in Mathematics Education Supporting the Sustainability of 21st-Century Skills. Sustainability, 12(23), 10113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310113
Tachie, S. A. (2019). Meta-cognitive Skills and Strategies Application: How this Helps Learners in Mathematics Problem-solving. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/105364
Tao, X., Zhang, Y., Xie, Z., Zhao, Z., Zhou, G., & Lu, Y. (2025). Unifying the syntax and semantics for math word problem solving. Neurocomputing, 636, 130042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130042
Teng, F. (2020). The role of metacognitive knowledge and regulation in mediating university EFL learners’ writing performance. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(5), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1615493
Teo Lian Wan, C., & Abdullah, N. A. (2023). Using CUBES strategy in a remote setting for primary mathematics word problems. Jurnal Elemen, 9(1), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i1.6864
Tschisgale, P., Kubsch, M., Wulff, P., Petersen, S., & Neumann, K. (2025). Exploring the sequential structure of students’ physics problem-solving approaches using process mining and sequence analysis. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1), 010111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010111
Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: a survey. ZDM, 52(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4
Wang, C. Y., Chen, S., & Huang, M. Y. (2023). Exploring medical students’ metacognitive and regulatory dimensions of diagnostic problem solving. Medical Education Online, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2210804
Widyawati, E., & Rahayu, S. W. (2020). Kecerdasan Logis Matematis Siswa Kelas IX MTs Negeri Tarakan dalam Memecahkan Masalah Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel [Logical Mathematical Intelligence of Grade IX Students of MTs Negeri Tarakan in Solving the Problem of Linear Equation Systems of Two Variables. MUST: Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology, 5(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.30651/must.v5i1.3641
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zaenal Arifin, Al Jupri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Elemen agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
