E-modules assisted learning: Mathematical reasoning of junior high school students in solving mathematical literacy problems

Authors

  • Nailis Safiro Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Novita Sari Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Zuli Nuraeni Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Novika Sukmaningthias Universitas Sriwijaya
  • M. Hasbi Ramadhan Universitas Sriwijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v12i2.33128

Keywords:

e-modules, linear equations with two variables, mathematical literacy, mathematical reasoning

Abstract

The growing use of digital learning media in mathematics classrooms has not been matched by sufficient evidence of students’ mathematical reasoning (MR) when solving mathematical literacy problems. This study aims to analyze the MR of junior high school students at different MR levels while solving mathematical literacy problems on systems of linear equations in two variables (SLETV) in a learning context supported by a mathematical literacy-based e-module. Using a descriptive qualitative design, the study involved ninth-grade students from a public junior high school in Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia. Data were obtained through three written mathematical literacy problems and follow-up semi-structured interviews and then analyzed using three MR indicators: finding patterns of relationships and generalizing a statement, proposing conjecture, and verifying the truth of an argument. The results reveal that students’ MR remains limited, with only a small proportion demonstrating medium to high-level reasoning. High-reasoning students are already capable of demonstrating all indicators of MR, but low-reasoning students struggle to develop mathematical models from contextual problems. These findings suggest that e-module-assisted learning can support reasoning, but students at lower reasoning levels still require more explicit scaffolding, particularly for modeling, conjecturing, and justification.

References

Alderton, J., & Pratt, N. (2025). The construction of mathematical reasoning as a pedagogical object. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 120(2), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-025-10420-1

Arnesen, K. K., & Rø, K. (2024). The complexity of supporting reasoning in a mathematics classroom of shared authority. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 26(2), 159–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2022.2059628

Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research – A systematic review of recent trends. Computers & Education, 114, 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004

Drijvers, P., & Sinclair, N. (2024). The role of digital technologies in mathematics education: Purposes and perspectives. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01535-x

Education Standards Curriculum and Assessment Agency. (2025). Learning outcomes in early childhood education, primary education, and secondary education No. 046 Year 2025. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/322487/permendikdasmen-no-11-tahun-2025

Efendi, S. A., Haryono, Y., & Cesaria, A. (2024). Development of e-module based on mathematical literacy skill in statistical materials. Vygotsky, 6(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.30736/voj.v6i1.951

Endrawati, P., & Ramlah. (2021). Analysis of mathematical reasoning ability in probability material reviewed from students' initial abilities. Maju, 8(2), 148–158. https://www.neliti.com/publications/502026/analisis-kemampuan-penalaran-matematis-pada-materi-peluang-ditinjau-dari-kemampu#cite

Engelbrecht, J., & Borba, M. C. (2024). Recent developments in using digital technology in mathematics education. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 56(2), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01530-2

Erfani, G. A., Rokhman, M. S., & Sholikhakh, R. A. (2020). Analysis of students' errors in solving mathematical story problems on social arithmetic material according to Polya. AKSIOMA : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v11i2.6850

Evans, P., Martin, A. J., Evans, P., & Martin, A. J. (2023). Load reduction instruction : Multilevel effects for motivation, engagement, and achievement in mathematics. Educational Psychology, 43(10), 1125–1143. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2290442

Greene, J. (2017). Self-Regulation in Education (1st ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315537450

Hamidah, S. &. (2021). Online learning amidst the outbreak Covid-19. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Keislaman, 1(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.55883/jipkis.v1i2.9

Hasanah, S. I., Tafrilyanto, C. F., & Aini, Y. (2019). Mathematical reasoning: The characteristics of students’ mathematical abilities in problem solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012057

Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 153(2020), 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897

Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9761-8

Khairunnisa, G. F., & Ilmi, Y. I. N. (2020). Concrete versus digital mathematics learning media: A systematic literature review in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0. Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 3(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.21274/jtm.2020.3.2.131-140

Kollosche, D. (2021). Styles of reasoning for mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(3), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10046-z

Lessing, M. J., & Ogbonnaya, U. I. (2026). Reasoning and proof in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. Discover Education, 5(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-01016-1

Marsitin, R., & Sesanti, N. R. (2023). Developing an electronic module based on mathematical literacy to enhance students’ mathematical reasoning. Jurnal Elemen, 9(1), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i1.6915

Niswah, U., & Qohar, A. (2020). Mathematical reasoning in mathematics learning on pyramid volume concepts. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 3(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v3i1.2400

Nurhalin, Y., & Effendi, K. N. S. (2022). The mathematical reasoning ability of junior high school students on the material of two-variable linear equation systems. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 8(1), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i1.1957

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. In PISA. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89–100. https://journalofmathed.scholasticahq.com/article/90403-mathematics-literacy-are-we-able-to-put-the-mathematics-we-learn-into-everyday-use

Reuter, F. (2023). Explorative mathematical argumentation: a theoretical framework for identifying and analyzing argumentation processes in early mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 112(3), 415–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10199-5

Rosyada, A., Sari, N., Sukmaningthias, N., & Nuraeni, Z. (2024). Mathematical reasoning and self-regulated learning differences by using a mathematical literacy-based e- module. Jurnal Elemen, 10(2), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v10i2.23989

Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Moutsios-Rentzos, A. (2024). Proof and proving in school and university mathematics education research: A systematic review. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 56(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01518-y

Sulistiawati, S., Suryadi, D., & Fatimah, S. (2015). Didactic design of mathematical reasoning to overcome learning difficulties of junior high school students in the area and volume of pyramids. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 6(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v6i2.4833

Suparman, S., Jupri, A., Musdi, E., Amalita, N., Tamur, M., & Chen, J. (2021). Male and female students’ mathematical reasoning skills in solving trigonometry problems. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 14(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v14i1.441

Valenta, A., Rø, K., & Klock, S. I. (2024). A framework for reasoning in school mathematics: analyzing the development of mathematical claims. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 116(1), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10309-5

Vebrian, R., Putra, Y. Y., Saraswati, S., & Wijaya, T. T. (2021). Students' mathematical reasoning ability in solving contextual mathematical literacy problems. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 2602–2614. http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4369

Weigand, H. G., Trgalova, J., & Tabach, M. (2024). Mathematics teaching, learning, and assessment in the digital age. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 56(4), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01612-9

Young, J., Gorumek, F., & Hamilton, C. (2018). Technology effectiveness in the mathematics classroom: a systematic review of meta-analytic research. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0104-2

Downloads

Published

30-04-2026

How to Cite

Safiro, N., Sari, N., Nuraeni, Z., Sukmaningthias, N., & Ramadhan, M. H. (2026). E-modules assisted learning: Mathematical reasoning of junior high school students in solving mathematical literacy problems. Jurnal Elemen, 12(2), 428–446. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v12i2.33128

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.