Investigating students’ mathematical literacy: How students solve PISA-like problems in the Jambi context

Authors

  • Tria Gustiningsi Universitas Jambi
  • Feri Tiona Pasaribu Universitas Jambi
  • Ranisa Junita Universitas Jambi
  • Zaleha Ismail Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v12i2.34156

Keywords:

jambi's context, mathematical literacy, mathematical process, PISA-like problems

Abstract

Despite its central role in preparing students to solve real-world problems, students’ mathematical literacy remains insufficiently understood, particularly regarding the cognitive processes involved in context-based problem solving. As emphasised in the PISA framework, mathematical literacy involves the ability to formulate, employ, and interpret mathematics in meaningful contexts. However, prior studies have largely focused on students’ final answers and rarely examined these processes within local cultural contexts, including Jambi, where students’ mathematical literacy remains relatively low. Addressing this gap, this study analyses students’ mathematical literacy processes using Jambi-based contextual tasks. A qualitative descriptive design involved 24 seventh-grade junior secondary school students selected through purposive sampling, representing high, moderate, and low ability levels. Data were collected through PISA-like written tests and semi-structured interviews, and analysed using the mathematical literacy framework focusing on formulate, employ, and interpret–evaluate processes. The results show that 68.06% of students were able to formulate problems, 52.78% employed mathematical procedures, and only 34.72% interpreted and evaluated solutions appropriately. These findings indicate students’ difficulties in connecting mathematical results with contextual meanings. The study highlights the importance of process-oriented assessment and culturally contextualised tasks to strengthen students’ interpretative and evaluative competencies in mathematical literacy.

Author Biographies

Tria Gustiningsi, Universitas Jambi

Despite its central role in preparing students to solve real-world problems, students’ mathematical literacy remains insufficiently understood, particularly regarding the cognitive processes involved in context-based problem solving. As emphasised in the PISA framework, mathematical literacy involves the ability to formulate, employ, and interpret mathematics in meaningful contexts. However, prior studies have largely focused on students’ final answers and rarely examined these processes within local cultural contexts, including Jambi, where students’ mathematical literacy remains relatively low. Addressing this gap, this study analyses students’ mathematical literacy processes using Jambi-based contextual tasks. A qualitative descriptive design involved 24 seventh-grade junior secondary school students selected through purposive sampling, representing high, moderate, and low ability levels. Data were collected through PISA-like written tests and semi-structured interviews, and analysed using the mathematical literacy framework focusing on formulate, employ, and interpret–evaluate processes. The results show that 68.06% of students were able to formulate problems, 52.78% employed mathematical procedures, and only 34.72% interpreted and evaluated solutions appropriately. These findings indicate students’ difficulties in connecting mathematical results with contextual meanings. The study highlights the importance of process-oriented assessment and culturally contextualised tasks to strengthen students’ interpretative and evaluative competencies in mathematical literacy.

Feri Tiona Pasaribu, Universitas Jambi

Despite its central role in preparing students to solve real-world problems, students’ mathematical literacy remains insufficiently understood, particularly regarding the cognitive processes involved in context-based problem solving. As emphasised in the PISA framework, mathematical literacy involves the ability to formulate, employ, and interpret mathematics in meaningful contexts. However, prior studies have largely focused on students’ final answers and rarely examined these processes within local cultural contexts, including Jambi, where students’ mathematical literacy remains relatively low. Addressing this gap, this study analyses students’ mathematical literacy processes using Jambi-based contextual tasks. A qualitative descriptive design involved 24 seventh-grade junior secondary school students selected through purposive sampling, representing high, moderate, and low ability levels. Data were collected through PISA-like written tests and semi-structured interviews, and analysed using the mathematical literacy framework focusing on formulate, employ, and interpret–evaluate processes. The results show that 68.06% of students were able to formulate problems, 52.78% employed mathematical procedures, and only 34.72% interpreted and evaluated solutions appropriately. These findings indicate students’ difficulties in connecting mathematical results with contextual meanings. The study highlights the importance of process-oriented assessment and culturally contextualised tasks to strengthen students’ interpretative and evaluative competencies in mathematical literacy.

Ranisa Junita, Universitas Jambi

Despite its central role in preparing students to solve real-world problems, students’ mathematical literacy remains insufficiently understood, particularly regarding the cognitive processes involved in context-based problem solving. As emphasised in the PISA framework, mathematical literacy involves the ability to formulate, employ, and interpret mathematics in meaningful contexts. However, prior studies have largely focused on students’ final answers and rarely examined these processes within local cultural contexts, including Jambi, where students’ mathematical literacy remains relatively low. Addressing this gap, this study analyses students’ mathematical literacy processes using Jambi-based contextual tasks. A qualitative descriptive design involved 24 seventh-grade junior secondary school students selected through purposive sampling, representing high, moderate, and low ability levels. Data were collected through PISA-like written tests and semi-structured interviews, and analysed using the mathematical literacy framework focusing on formulate, employ, and interpret–evaluate processes. The results show that 68.06% of students were able to formulate problems, 52.78% employed mathematical procedures, and only 34.72% interpreted and evaluated solutions appropriately. These findings indicate students’ difficulties in connecting mathematical results with contextual meanings. The study highlights the importance of process-oriented assessment and culturally contextualised tasks to strengthen students’ interpretative and evaluative competencies in mathematical literacy.

Zaleha Ismail, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Despite its central role in preparing students to solve real-world problems, students’ mathematical literacy remains insufficiently understood, particularly regarding the cognitive processes involved in context-based problem solving. As emphasised in the PISA framework, mathematical literacy involves the ability to formulate, employ, and interpret mathematics in meaningful contexts. However, prior studies have largely focused on students’ final answers and rarely examined these processes within local cultural contexts, including Jambi, where students’ mathematical literacy remains relatively low. Addressing this gap, this study analyses students’ mathematical literacy processes using Jambi-based contextual tasks. A qualitative descriptive design involved 24 seventh-grade junior secondary school students selected through purposive sampling, representing high, moderate, and low ability levels. Data were collected through PISA-like written tests and semi-structured interviews, and analysed using the mathematical literacy framework focusing on formulate, employ, and interpret–evaluate processes. The results show that 68.06% of students were able to formulate problems, 52.78% employed mathematical procedures, and only 34.72% interpreted and evaluated solutions appropriately. These findings indicate students’ difficulties in connecting mathematical results with contextual meanings. The study highlights the importance of process-oriented assessment and culturally contextualised tasks to strengthen students’ interpretative and evaluative competencies in mathematical literacy.

References

Burkhardt, H., Pead, D., & Stacey, K. (2024). Learning and teaching for mathematical literacy: Making mathematics useful for everyone. In Learning and Teaching for Mathematical Literacy: Making Mathematics Useful for Everyone. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003303503

Charmila, N., Zulkardi, Z., & Darmawijoyo, D. (2016). Pengembangan soal matematika model PISA menggunakan Konteks Jambi [Development of PISA-Style Math Questions Using the Jambi Context]. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7444

Deda, Y. N., & Maifa, T. (2021). Efek potensial lembar kerja siswa matematika menggunakan konteks makanan tradisional Timor pada materi perbandingan [The potential effects of math worksheets for students using the context of traditional Timorese food in the topic of ratios]. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.3214

Ekawati, R., Susanti, S., & Chen, J.-C. (2020). Primary students’ mathematical literacy: A case study. Infinity Journal, 9(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i1.p49-58

Gusriani, N., Pasaribu, F., & Gustiningsi, T. (2025). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematika siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal PISA konten space and shape [Analysis of students’ mathematical literacy skills in solving PISA questions on space and shape]. Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v10i4.7542

Gustiningsi, T., Pasaribu, F. T., & Ramalisa, Y. (2025). Analysis of the mathematical literacy ability of middle school students in Jambi City in solving PISA questions. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3446, 030015. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0308689

Gustiningsi, T., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Hapizah. (2022). Secondary mathematics teachers’ ability in solving PISA-like mathematics problems. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2577, G. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0096217

Gustiningsi, T., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Hapizah. (2023). Developing a PISA-like mathematical problem: Using traditional food context. International Journal of Education & Curriculum Application, 6(3), 324–337. https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v6i3.20200

Gustiningsi, T., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Hapizah. (2024a). LEPscO: Mathematical literacy learning environment for the guru penggerak program. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 661–682. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp661-682

Gustiningsi, T., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Hapizah. (2024b). Supporting students’ mathematical literacy skill using digital tools. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3046(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0194695

Gustiningsi, T., Tiona Pasaribu, F., & Ramalisa, Y. (2026). Jambi batik pattern: Developing PISA-like mathematics problems. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 17(6), 311–339. https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.commons.gc.cuny.edu/wp-content/blogs.dir/34462/files/2026/01/13.-Gustiningsi-Pasaribu-and-Ramalisa-vol17no6.pdf

Hidayanti, D. R., & Hidayati, K. (2025). Identification of students’ errors in solving mathematical literacy problems on quadratic function material. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT, 51(1), 216–222. https://ijpsat.org/

Hwang, J., & Ham, Y. (2021). Relationship between mathematical literacy and opportunity to learn with different types of mathematical tasks. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.12.2.13625.199-222

Iswari, I., Pasaribu, F. T., Gustiningsi, T., & Nusantara, D. S. (2025). Pengembangan soal matematika tipe PISA level 6 menggunakan konteks benda bersejarah [Development of Level 6 PISA-style math questions using historical artifacts as context]. Journal Numeracy, 12(1), 19–36. https://ejournal.bbg.ac.id/numeracy

Jablonski, S. (2023). Is it all about the setting? — A comparison of mathematical modelling with real objects and their representation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10215-2

Jiang, P., Lin, W., Ruan, X., Zhang, J., & Xu, R. (2025). Predicting the influencing factors of secondary school students’ behavioral intention of mathematical problem-solving reflection by structural equation model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06174-z

Kemdikbud. (2023). Rapor pendidikan Indonesia tahun 2023 [Indonesia's 2023 education report card]. Merdeka Belajar.

Kemendikbud. (2017). Materi pendukung literasi numerasi [Supporting materials for numeracy literacy]. In Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. https://gln.kemdikbud.go.id/glnsite/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/cover-materipendukung-literasi-numerasi-gabung.pdf.

Kemendikbud. (2021). Panduan penguatan literasi dan numerasi di sekolah [A guide to strengthening literacy and numeracy in schools]. Kemendikbud.

Kolar, V. M., & Hodnik, T. (2021). Mathematical literacy from the perspective of solving contextual problems. In European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.467

Leiss, D., Ehmke, T., & Heine, L. (2024). Reality-based tasks for competency-based education: The need for an integrated analysis of subject-specific, linguistic, and contextual task features. Learning and Individual Differences, 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102518

Lit, S., Kool, M., & Drijvers, P. (2026). Teacher knowledge and skills for mathematical problem solving: A systematic literature review. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-025-09737-8

Lusiana, Pasaribu, F. T., Gustiningsi, T., & Nusantara, D. S. (2025). Pengembangan soal matematika tipe PISA konten quantity menggunakan konteks kopi khas Jambi untuk siswa SMP [Development of PISA-style mathematics questions on quantity using the context of Jambi’s signature coffee for junior high school students]. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 8(3). https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v8i3.27081

Lusinda, U., Pasaribu, F. T., Gustiningsi, T., & Nusantara, D. S. (2025). Pengembangan soal matematika tipe PISA konten uncertainty and data menngunakan konteks Museum Siginjai Jambi [Development of PISA-style mathematics items on uncertainty and data using the context of the Siginjai Museum in Jambi]. Numeracy, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v12i1.3128

Marsyandia, I. P., Nusantara, D. S., & Gustiningsi, T. (2025). Assessing students’ mathematical literacy through PISA items in the space and shape content. Brillo Journal, 5(1).

Medeiros, R. P., Ramalho, G. L., & Falcao, T. P. (2019). A systematic literature review on teaching and learning introductory programming in higher education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(2). https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2018.2864133

Muslimahayati, M. (2020). Pengembangan soal kemampuan berpikir kritis berbasis kearifan lokal Sumatera Selatan pada materi trigonometri [Development of critical thinking questions based on the local wisdom of South Sumatra in trigonometry]. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i1.2459

Nurhidayati, Nusantara, D. S., & Gustiningsi, T. (2025). Mathematical literacy review on PISA-type mathematics tasks: A focus on the quantity content. Numerical: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, (2), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.25217/numerical.v9.i2.6969

OECD. (2018). PISA 2022 mathematics framework. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2021-assessment-and-analytical-framework.htm

OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 Assessment and analytical framework. OECDPublishing.

OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

OECD. (2023c). The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Rahmi, M., Sainuddin, S., & Gustiningsi, T. (2025). Menggambar batik Jambi: Desain hypothetical learning trajectory materi barisan artimetika [Drawing Jambi batik: Designing a hypothetical learning trajectory for arithmetic sequences]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2).

Santos-Trigo, M. (2024). Problem solving in mathematics education: tracing its foundations and current research-practice trends. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01578-8

Siregar, M. S., Siregar, E. Y., & Elindra, R. (2021). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis di Pesantren Nurul Falah Panompuan [Analysis of mathematical problem-solving skills at the Nurul Falah Islamic Boarding School in Panompuan]. JURNAL. MathEdu (Mathematic Education Journal), 4(1).

Syaharani, D. N., Pasaribu. Feri Tiona, Gustiningsi, T., & Nusantara, D. S. (2025). Pengembangan e-modul berbasis problem based learning-augmented reality bermuatan soal PISA untuk meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa SMP [Development of e-modules based on problem-based learning and augmented reality that incorporate PISA-style questions to improve the mathematical reasoning skills of junior high school students]. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v15i3.3021

Utami, A. A. L. A., & Hakim, D. L. (2023). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa SMP pada materi bilangan bulat dan pecahan [Analysis of junior high school students’ mathematical problem-solving skills in the topic of integers and fractions]. Didactical Mathematics, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.31949/dm.v5i2.6381

Wahab A, A., Kusuma, Y. S., Juandi, D., Turmudi, T., Buhaerah, B., & Syaiful, S. (2024). Understanding students’ struggles in solving mathematical problems: A systematic literature review using Polya’s framework. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v14.i3.2024118

Wathani, D. H., Irawati, R., & Iswara, P. D. (2022). Development of meme learning media with PMRI to implement mathematics literacy in students elementary school. Mathematics Education Journal, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.16.3.15249.339-350

Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. (2015). Teachers’ teaching practices and beliefs regarding context-based tasks and their relation with students’ difficulties in solving these tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27, 637–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0157-8

Xu, B., Ma, X., Zhang, Y., & Wu, X. (2025). How does mathematical literacy affect creative thinking? Independent effects and differential impacts across proficiency groups. Acta Psychologica, 260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105509

Zalsi, R. N., Pasaribu, F. T., & Gustiningsi, T. (2025). Geometric concept in Jambi Batik: Developing a hypothetical learning trajectory for reflection material. Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v10i4.7398

Zulkardi, Z., & Kohar, A. W. (2018). Designing PISA-like mathematics tasks in Indonesia: Experiences and challenges. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012015

Downloads

Published

15-05-2026

How to Cite

Gustiningsi, T., Pasaribu, F. T., Junita, R., & Ismail, Z. (2026). Investigating students’ mathematical literacy: How students solve PISA-like problems in the Jambi context. Jurnal Elemen, 12(2), 631–651. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v12i2.34156

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.