Exploring high school teacher’s design of rich algebra tasks

Authors

  • Ajeng Gelora Mastuti Department of Mathematics Education, IAIN Ambon, Maluku http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7091-7920
  • Lydia Lia Prayitno Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, East Java

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i1.5851

Keywords:

high schools teachers', rich algebra tasks, tasks design

Abstract

The phenomenon in schools today is that teachers rarely change their tasks. However, the teacher's activities to change their tasks, build students' arguments, support solutions, and maintain arguments without long debates are important and exciting things to learn. This study explores the ideas of high school teachers about task design and practice in teaching mathematics. The authors surveyed twelve high school teachers who teach mathematics in East Java Province. First, the authors conducted preliminary observations to observe the design of mathematics teacher tasks for six months in eight schools. Second, the authors state that teachers are engaging and consistent in designing rich algebra tasks. Third, the authors examine the teacher's ideas through direct observation and unstructured interviews. The results show how teachers' ideas about task design enhance students' creative thinking by reforming tasks from textbooks into rich mathematics tasks. The design of the task carried out by the teacher is to create to stimulate creative thinking. The teachers also use their knowledge and understanding of the material and curriculum to modify mathematics tasks in students' mathematics books. The task given by the teacher is to improve students' reasoning, not just memorize formulas or properties.

References

Albay, E. M., & Eisma, D. V. (2021). Performance task assessment supported by the design thinking process: Results from a true experimental research. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100116

Álvarez, J. A. M., Arnold, E. G., Burroughs, E. A., Fulton, E. W., & Kercher, A. (2020). The design of tasks that address applications to teaching secondary mathematics for use in undergraduate mathematics courses. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 60, 100814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100814

Bademo, Y., & Tefera, B. F. (2016). Assessing the desired and actual levels of teachers’ participation in decision-making in secondary schools of Ethiopia. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(13), 1236–1242. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2625

Bakken, J., & Andersson-Bakken, E. (2021). The textbook task as a genre. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(6), 729–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1929499

Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7321–7338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x

Blazar, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2017). Teacher and teaching effects on students’ attitudes and behaviors. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716670260

Bringula, R., Reguyal, J. J., Tan, D. D., & Ulfa, S. (2021). Mathematics self-concept and challenges of learners in an online learning environment during COVID-19 pandemic. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00168-5

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020a). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020b). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Fitriati, F., Novita, R., & Johar, R. (2020a). Exploring the usefulness of rich mathematical tasks to enhance students' reflective thinking. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(2), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i2.24047

Goethe, E. V., & Colina, C. M. (2018). Taking advantage of diversity within the classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(2), 189–192. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00510

Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F.-L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6

Hadar, L. L., & Tirosh, M. (2019). Creative thinking in mathematics curriculum: An analytic framework. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100585

Hamdi, S., Suganda, I. A., & Hayati, N. (2018). Developing higher-order thinking skill (HOTS) test instrument using Lombok local cultures as contexts for junior secondary school mathematics. REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v4i2.22089

Hilmi, I., & Dewi, I. (2021). High order thinking skills: can it increase by using realistic mathematics education? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1819(1), 012056. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1819/1/012056

Johnson, H. L., Coles, A., & Clarke, D. (2017). Mathematical tasks and the student: Navigating “tensions of intentions” between designers, teachers, and students. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(6), 813–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0894-0

Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6

Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214

Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389

Lee, Y., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in problem posing. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2698

Levenson, E., Swisa, R., & Tabach, M. (2018). Evaluating the potential of tasks to occasion mathematical creativity: Definitions and measurements. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1450777

Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given” in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9

Lithner, J. (2017). Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance imitative and creative reasoning. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(6), 937–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0867-3

Mastuti, A. G., Nusantara, T., Purwanto, P., As’ari, A., Subanji, S., Abadyo, A., & Susiswo, S. (2016). Interpretation awareness of creativity mathematics teacher high school. International Education Studies, 9(9), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n9p32

Mata-Pereira, J., & da Ponte, J. P. (2017). Enhancing students’ mathematical reasoning in the classroom: Teacher actions facilitating generalization and justification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9773-4

Messiou, K., Bui, L. T., Ainscow, M., Gasteiger-Klicpera, B., Bešić, E., Paleczek, L., Hedegaard-Sørensen, L., Ulvseth, H., Vitorino, T., Santos, J., Simon, C., Sandoval, M., & Echeita, G. (2022). Student diversity and student voice conceptualisations in five European countries: Implications for including all students in schools. European Educational Research Journal, 21(2), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904120953241

Murtafiah, W., & Lukitasari, M. (2019). Developing pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics pre-service teacher through microteaching lesson study. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.13.2.7663.201-218

Murtafiah, W., Sa’dijah, C., Chandra, T. D., & Susiswo, S. (2019). Decision making of the winner of the national student creativity program in designing ICT-based learning media. TEM Journal, 8(3), 1039–1045.

Mustafa, G., & Derya, C. (2016). A research on future mathematics teachers instructional explanations: The case of Algebra. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(6), 1500–1508. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2823

Norton, S. J. (2017). Primary mathematics trainee teacher confidence and it’s relationship to mathematical knowledge. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n2.4

Peteros, E., Gamboa, A., Etcuban, J. O., Dinauanao, A., Sitoy, R., & Arcadio, R. (2020). Factors affecting mathematics performance of junior high school students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5938

Pratiwi, E., Nanna, A. W. I., Kusnadi, D., Aras, I., Kurniati, D., & Sepeng, P. (2022). Self-confidence attitude of novice primary teachers reflection on teaching mathematics. Jurnal Elemen, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v8i1.4022

Siregar, R., & Daut Siagian, M. (2019). Mathematical connection ability: Teacher’s perception and experience in learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), 012041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012041

Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(39), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1

Sullivan, P., Clarke, D., Clarke, B., Sullivan, P., Clarke, D., & Clarke, B. (2013). Researching tasks in mathematics classrooms. In teaching with tasks for effective mathematics learning (pp. 1–5). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4681-1_1

Tiani, D. A., Johar, R., & Bahrun, B. (2019). Students’ conceptual understanding in learning mathematics through scientific approach with mind mapping. Jurnal Beta, 12(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v12i2.256

van den Ham, A.-K., & Heinze, A. (2018). Does the textbook matter? Longitudinal effects of textbook choice on primary school students’ achievement in mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.005

Downloads

Published

02-01-2023

How to Cite

Mastuti, A. G., & Prayitno, L. L. (2023). Exploring high school teacher’s design of rich algebra tasks. Jurnal Elemen, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i1.5851

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.