Pengetahuan Pedagogi Mahasiswa Calon Guru dalam Perencanaan Pengajaran Matematika dan Hubungannya dengan Keyakinan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v6i2.2094Keywords:
beliefs, prospective teacher, pedagogical knowledgeAbstract
The purpose of this research is to describe the pedagogical knowledge of prospective teachers in designing mathematics learning and its relationship with beliefs about teaching. This research participant was a prospective teacher who was a constructivist belief that had taken a micro-teaching course and had excellent communication skills, as demonstrated by the fluency in delivering ideas. Data is collected through semi-structured interview techniques. The data obtained were coded, simplified, presented, triangulated time for the credibility data, and concluded. The results show that prospective teachers knew in preparing lesson plans and learning media by the curriculum to facilitate students learning in class. The selection of verbal representations, symbol representations, and the selection of contextual problems is in line with his belief that the teacher's role is to guide students and help them discover mathematical concepts actively. Prospective teachers have good knowledge about choosing the right time to ask questions to students. Prospective teachers know when to ask questions, when to reflect on students' answers, and when to ask new questions or give new assignments. Prospective teachers know assessment techniques, namely the assessment of learning outcomes obtained from the way students find solutions to problems and the suitability of problems with solutions made by students.
References
An, S., Kulm, G., & Wu, Z. (2004). The pedagogical content knowledge of middle school, mathematics teachers in China and the US. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(2), 145–172. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMTE.0000021943.35739.1c.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554.
Barkatsas, A. T., & Malone, J. (2005). A typology of mathematics teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning mathematics and instructional practices. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(2), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217416.
Bazeley, P. & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Belbase, S. (2012). Teacher belief, knowledge, and practice: A trichotomy of mathematics teacher education. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov /fulltext/ED530017.pdf.
Beswick, K. (2012). Teachers' beliefs about school mathematics and mathematicians' mathematics and their relationship to practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9333-2.
Black, J. W. (2008). Content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge of algebra teachers and changes in both types of knowledge as a result of professional development. Proceedings of the 5th Annual TEAM-Math Partnership Conference Pre-Session (pp. 30–40). New York, The Association of Public and Land-grant Universities.
Ernest, P. (1989). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. in Bloomfield, A. and Harries, T. Eds (1994) Teaching and Learning Mathematics, Derby, Association of Teachers of Mathematics.
Fennema, E., & Franke, M. (1992). Teacher’s knowledged and its impact. In Grouws D. A. (Ed.) Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (p.147-164). New York, Macmillan Publishing Company.
Felbrich, A., Kaiser, G., & Schmotz, C. (2012). The cultural dimension of beliefs: An investigation of future primary teachers’ epistemological beliefs concerning the nature of mathematics in 15 countries. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44(3), 355-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0418-x.
Felbrich, A., Müller, C., & Blömeke, S. (2008). Epistemological beliefs concerning the nature of mathematics among teacher educators and teacher education students in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40(5), 763-776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0153-5.
Gusnindar, G., Sutrisno, S., & Syaiful, S. (2018). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran matematika berdasarkan kerangka kerja TPACK pada materi lingkaran untuk mengoptimalkan kemampuan penalaran deduktif. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 403-412. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v7i3.1557.
Guzel, E. B. (2010). An investigation of pre-service mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge, using solid object. Journal Scientific Research and Essay, 5(14), 187-1880.
Harel, G., & Lim, H.K. (2004). Mathematics teacher knowledge based: Preliminary result. In marit, J.H., and Anne, B.F. (eds). Proccedings of the 28th Conferrence of the International Group for the Phycology of Mathematics Education (vol 3, 25-32). Bergen, Norway: Bergen University College.
Karahasan, B. (2010). Pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of composite and inverse functions. Turki: Secondary Science and Mathematics Education Department, Middle East Technical University.
Kilic, H. (2011). The nature of pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education–CERME7 (pp. 2690–2696). Rzeszów, University of Rzeszów.
Kwong, C. W., Joseph, Y. K. K., Eric, C. C. M., Khoh, L. T. S., Gek, C. K., & Eng, N. L. (2007). Development of mathematics pedagogical content knowledge in student teachers. The Mathematics Educator, 10(2), 27-54.
Leder, G. C., & Forgasz, H. J. (2002). Measuring mathematical belief and their impact on the learning of mathematics: A new approach. In G. C.Leider, E. Pehkonen, dan G. Torner (ed). Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education?. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47958-3.
Lestari, N. D. S., Juniati, D., & Suwarsono, S.T. (2018). Exploring the Knowledge of Content and Teaching (KCT) of prospective math teacher in planning mathematical literacy teaching. Conference Proceedings The 5th International Conference on Research, Implementation, & Education of Mathematics and Sciences. NewYork, IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012150.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ma’rufi, M., Budayasa, I. K., & Juniati, D. (2017). Pedagogical content knowledge: Knowledge of pedagogy novice teachers in mathematics learning on limit algebraic function. Conference Proceedings International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science (ICMSC) 2016. College Park: AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4975975.
Miles, M. & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif: Buku sumber tentang metode-metode baru. Jakarta: UI Press.
Muhtarom, M., Juniati, D., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2017). Consistency and inconsistency of prospective teachers’ beliefs in mathematics, teaching, learning and problem solving. Conference Proceeding The 4th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Science (4th ICRIEMS). College Park: AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995141.
Muhtarom, M., Juniati, D., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2018). Exploring prospective teachers' beliefs about nature of mathematics. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13(10), 3547-3554.
Muhtarom, M., Juniati, D., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2019). Examining prospective teacher beliefs and pedagogical content knowledge towards teaching practice in mathematics class: a case study. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.7326.185-202.
Muhtarom, M., Murtianto, Y. H., & Sutrisno, S. (2017). Thinking process of students with high-mathematics ability (A study on QSR NVivo 11-assisted data analysis). International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(17), 6934-6940.
Nizaruddin, N., Muhtarom, M., & Murtianto, Y. H. (2017). Exploring of multi mathematical representation capability in problem solving on senior high school students. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 75(6), 591-598.
Nizaruddin, N., Muhtarom, M., & Zuhri, M. S. (2019). Improving mechanical engineering students' achievement in calculus through problem-based learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research 7(12), 2729-2733. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071221.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2005). Jakarta: Kemdikbud.
Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(3), 255–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-005-0853-5.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004.
Stipek, D. J., Givvin, K. B., Salmon, J. M., & MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00052-4.
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Turnuklu, E. B., & Yesildere, S. (2007). The pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics: Pre-service primary mathematics teachers' perspectives in Turkey. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers: The Journal, 1(2), 1-13.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Elemen agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
