Development of collaborative based inquiry learning tools using local wisdom context to improve students metacognitive
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i1.6969Keywords:
collaborative based inquiry, local culture, students' metacognitive abilitiesAbstract
Geometry is one of the essential materials for students. However, geometry material, especially the concept of geometry, still needs to be made more accessible for students. Models and media are needed, and the proper context in learning mathematics in geometric material. Therefore, this research aims to develop valid, practical, and effective learning using the Collaborative Based Inquiry learning model based on local wisdom to improve students' metacognitive abilities. This study is Research and Development (R & D). There were five stages in this study: to analyze the developed product, develop the initial product, expert validation and revision, small-scale field trials and product revisions, and large-scale field trials and final products. Based on the results of the study obtained, several research conclusions, including that the learning device was valid. From the limited test, the results of the five ability test questions were obtained metacognitive is also valid and reliable. Developed learning plans as well practicals from the side of teachers and students. Moreover, the average value of students' metacognitive abilities in the experimental class is classified as effective to increase students' metacognitive abilities. That way, learning mathematics design with Collaborative Based Inquiry based on local wisdom can improve students' metacognitive abilities.
References
Adelabu, F. M., Makgato, M., & Ramaligela, M. S. (2019). The importance of dynamic geometry computer software on learners’ performance in geometry. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 17(1), 52–63.
Alex, J. K., & Mammen, K. J. (2012). A survey of South African grade 10 learners’ geometric thinking levels in terms of the Van Hiele theory. The Anthropologist, 14(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2012.11891229
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: The case of geometry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9173-0
Dahar, R. W. (2006). Learning & learning theories. PT. Gelora Aksara Pratama.
Dekker, R., & Elshout-Mohr, M. (1998). A process model for interaction and mathematical level raising. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003187204737
Dewi, K., Sadia, I. W., & Ristiati, N. P. (2013). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran IPA terpadu dengan setting inkuiri terbimbing untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan kinerja ilmiah siswa [Development of integrated science learning tools with guided inquiry settings to improve students' scientific conceptual understanding and performance]. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 1–11. https://ejournal-pasca.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_ipa/article/view/548
Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01235
Everson, H. T., & Tobias, S. (1998). The ability to estimate knowledge and performance in college: A metacognitive analysis. Instructional Science, 26(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003040130125
Hastuti, I. D. (2020). Development of collaborative inquiry-based learning model to improve elementary school students‘ metacognitive ability. http://www.ijstr.org/final-print/feb2020/Development-Of-Collaborative-Inquiry-based-Learning-Model-To-Improve-Elementary-School-Students-Metacognitive-Ability.pdf
Hastuti, I. D., Surahmat, S., Sutarto, S., & Dafik, D. (2020). The effect of guided inquiry learning in improving metacognitive skill of elementary school students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13420a
Herawaty, D., Widada, W., Novita, T., Waroka, L., & Lubis, A. (2018). Students’ metacognition on mathematical problem solving through ethnomathematics in Rejang Lebong, Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088(1), 012089. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012089
Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., Sobocinski, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2021). Metacognition in collaborative learning. In International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 281–294). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_15
Jayapraba, G., & Kanmani, M. (2014). Effect of metacognitive strategy on jigsaw cooperative learning method to enhance biology achievement. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 4(2), 47–57.
Jong, T. (2006). Technological advances in inquiry learning. Science, 312(5773), 532–533. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127750
King, F. J., Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (1993). Higher order thinking skills. Assessment & evaluation educational services program. The Educational Services Program.
Langgeng, L., Sajidan, S., & Prayitno, B. A. (2017). Pengembangan model pembelajaran inkuiri kolaboratif berbasis potensi lokal dan implementasinya pada materi tumbuhan lumut dan paku [Development of a collaborative inquiry learning model based on local potential and its implementation on moss and fern material]. Inkuiri: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 1–12. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/inkuiri/article/view/17256
Nainggolan, E. N. (2022). Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri berbasis kolaboratif terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada materi gaya d ikelas IV SDN 165735 Kota Tebing Tinggi [The effect of collaborative inquiry-based learning models on student learning outcomes in class IV SDN 165735 Tebing Tinggi City]. https://repository.uhn.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/7157/PENGARUHMODEL%20PEMBELAJARAN%20INKUIRI%20BERBASIS%20KOLABORATIF%20TERHADAP%20HASIL%20BELAJAR%20SISWA%20PADA%20MATERI.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Puslitjaknov, T. (2008). Metode penelitian pengembangan [Development research methods]. Depdiknas.
Rizi, C. E., Najafipour, M., & Dehghan, S. (2013). The effect of the using the brainstorming method on the academic achievement of students in grade five in Tehran elementary schools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 230–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.045
Serin, H. (2018). A comparison of teacher-centered and student-centered approaches in educational settings. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 5(1), 164–167. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v5i1p164
Shufa, N. K. F. (2018). Pembelajaran berbasis kearifan lokal di sekolah dasar: Sebuah kerangka konseptual [Local wisdom-based learning in elementary schools: A conceptual framework]. INOPENDAS: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 1(1), 48–53. https://jurnal.umk.ac.id/index.php/pendas/article/view/2316
Supiyati, S., Hanum, F., & Jailani. (2019). Ethnomathematics in sasaknese architecture. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5383.47-58
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Elemen agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Jurnal Elemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
