Designing Meaningful Lessons: Barriers and Solutions in Instructional Planning Among Indonesian Prospective EFL Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v9i2.30897Keywords:
Instructional planning, prospective EFL teachers, lesson plan, contextualised materialsAbstract
Instructional planning is widely recognised as essential for effective teaching, yet prospective teachers often lack the knowledge, experience, and resources to design context-responsive lessons. Research on lesson planning has predominantly focused on in-service teachers, leaving limited insight into the multidimensional barriers teacher candidates face in Indonesian EFL contexts, particularly within private universities. This qualitative case study addresses this gap by examining two guiding questions: (1) What factors hinder prospective teachers in designing instructional plans? Moreover, (2) What solutions can effectively address these barriers? Three purposively selected eighth-semester students from the English Language Education Study Program at a private university in Indonesia were studied based on scaffolding principles. Data were triangulated through open-ended questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis, and then analysed thematically with member checking to ensure trustworthiness. Findings highlight three interconnected challenges: limited mastery of pedagogical vocabulary and authentic material development, misalignment between methods and materials, and a persistent gap between theoretical coursework and practical classroom dynamics. Proposed solutions include intensive tiered mentoring by lecturers and supervising teachers, integration of authentic locally relevant materials, and real-case-based lesson design workshops. These findings contribute to teacher education research by offering evidence-based recommendations for curriculum reform and practicum design that strengthen prospective teachers’ competence in creating meaningful and contextually grounded lesson plans.
References
Achmad, D., Komariah, E., Jannah, W. M., & Silviyanti, T. M. (2023). Probing into the obstacles faced by internship student-teachers in designing lesson plans. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(1), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.26647
Alanazi, M. H. (2019). A study of the pre-service trainee teachers' problems in designing lesson plans. Arab World English Journal, 10(1), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no1.15
Alsalihi, H. D. (2020). Main difficulties faced by EFL students in language learning. Journal of College of Education for Women, 31(2), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.36231/coedw.v31i2.1359
Baecher, L., Farnsworth, T., & Ediger, A. (2013). The challenges of planning language objectives in content-based ESL instruction. Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813505381
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/qrj0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J.W. and Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches. 4th Edition, SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks.
Crosthwaite, P., Luciana, N., & Wijaya, D. (2021). Exploring language teachers’ lesson planning for corpus-based language teaching: a focus on developing TPACK for corpora and DDL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(7), 1392–1420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1995001
Csanadi, A., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ evidence-based reasoning during pedagogical problem-solving: better together? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(1), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00467-4
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Research Brief. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
Grossman, P. (Ed.). (2018). Teaching core practices in teacher education. Harvard Education Press.
Grub, A., Biermann, A., Lewalter, D., & Brünken, R. (2021). Professional knowledge and specificity of task instruction influence prospective teachers’ professional vision. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103517
Hanifa, R. (2018). EFL published materials: An evaluation of English textbooks for junior high school in Indonesia. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.2p.166
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181522
Hobbs, L., & Porsch, R. (2021). Teaching out-of-field: Challenges for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(5), 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1985280
Huda, M. (2017). The use of authentic materials in teaching English: Indonesia teachers’ perspective in EFL classes. People International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 1907–1927. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.19071927
Jantarach, V., & Soontornwipast, K. (2018). EFL student teachers’ lesson planning processes: A grounded theory study. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 9(3), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3258831
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Le, K. L., & Bui, L. D. T. (2024). From imagination to practice: Unravelling the professional identity of a pre-service EFL teacher. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 4(4), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.24441
Lomi, A. N. K., & Mbato, C. L. (2020). Struggles and strategies in constructing professional identity: The first-year teaching experiences of Indonesian EFL novice teachers. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.4.1.1-19
Malaikosa, C. A., & Sahayu, W. (2018). Teachers’ challenges on implementing EFL curriculum in Indonesian rural area. Journal of Foreign Language Education and Technology, 4(1).
Maloshonok, N., & Terentev, E. (2017). The mismatch between student educational expectations and realities: prevalence, causes, and consequences. European Journal of Higher Education, 7(4), 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2017.1348238
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Mufanti, R., Carter, D., & England, N. (2024). Outcomes-based education in Indonesian higher education: Reporting on the understanding, challenges, and support available to teachers. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100873
Nurmatova, S., & Altun, M. (2023). A comprehensive review of Bloom’s taxonomy integration to enhancing novice EFL Educators’ Pedagogical impact. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4593934
Pastini, N. W., & Lilasari, L. N. T. (2023). Empowering EFL students: A review of student-centred learning effectiveness and impact. Journal of Applied Studies in Language, 7(2), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.31940/jasl.v7i2.246-259
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Presnilla-Espada, J. (2014). An exploratory study on simulated teaching as experienced by education students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020106
Renandya, W. A., Hamied, F. A., & Joko, N. (2018). English language proficiency in Indonesia: Issues and prospects. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 15(3), 618–629. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.3.4.618
Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (2019). Andrew Stewart. In The ID CaseBook (pp. 271–274). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315148083-26
Sali, P., & Kecik, I. (2018). Challenges of first years of teaching in Turkey: Voices of novice EFL teachers. English Language Teaching, 11(4), 117. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n4p117
Sanchez, G. (2024). Knowledge and skills of pre-service teachers in lesson planning: Inputs to developing a Lesson Planning Guide (LPG). E-DAWA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 4(2), 159–206. https://doi.org/10.56901/dxyn8736
Schleicher, A. (2018). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system, strong performers and successful reformers in education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage Publications, London.
Schwandt, T. A. (2014). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Sage publications.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications, Inc.
Straessle, J. M. W. (2014). Teachers' perspectives of effective lesson planning: A comparative analysis. The College of William and Mary.
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21stcentury competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
Wulandari, P. D. M., Tantra, D. K., & Santosa, M. H. (2021). Teacher’s preparation of lesson plan and constraints in English as a foreign language during the pandemic outbreak in the junior high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 9(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v9i1.32518
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Wendi Kusriandi, Endang Herawan, Neneng Aminah, Noordin Bin Mamat

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with VELES agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citations of published work.
VELES is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.