Digital Storytelling in Elementary EFL Classrooms: Students’ Multidimensional Engagement and Teachers’ Pedagogical Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v10i1.31917Keywords:
digital storytelling, English language learning, pedagogical challenges, students’ perceptionsAbstract
Digital storytelling has the potential to strengthen English literacy in EFL elementary classrooms by fostering meaningful student engagement. This study explores upper-grade elementary students’ perceptions of digital storytelling through cognitive, affective, and behavioral engagement, as well as teachers’ pedagogical challenges in its implementation. Using an interpretative phenomenological case study design, the study involved 21 students from Grades 4–6 and three English teachers at a public elementary school in North Bali, Indonesia. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. The findings indicate that students perceived digital storytelling positively, showing developmental progression from basic linguistic understanding to higher-order engagement, increased motivation, active participation, and emerging learning transfer. Digital storytelling was perceived to support vocabulary learning, comprehension, and collaboration through multimodal learning experiences. However, teachers encountered pedagogical challenges related to content selection, preparation time, learner diversity, technological constraints, and classroom management. Despite these challenges, teachers demonstrated adaptive practices through scaffolding, peer tutoring, collaborative planning, and flexible use of digital resources. The study highlights the importance of teachers’ adaptive pedagogy in optimizing digital storytelling for English literacy development.
References
Abdusyukur, M. R., Sudana, D., & Muslim, A. B. (2022). Exploring Indonesian EFL classroom interactions in an online setting. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 6(3), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.6.3.445-457
Alase, A. (2017). The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A Guide to a Good Qualitative Research Approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.2p.9
Angelica, W., & Afriani, I. H. (2024). Engaging Indonesian elementary school students in reading activities through web-based educational games. English Language Teaching Methodology, 4(3), 470–481. https://doi.org/10.56983/eltm.v4i3.1684
Artieda, G. (2017). The role of L1 literacy and reading habits on the L2 achievement of adult learners of English as a foreign language. System, 66, 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.03.020
Azzahra, A., & Apoko, T. W. (2024). Literacy movement in increasing reading interest of elementary school students. Edunesia Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 5(3), 1530–1542. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v5i3.1006
Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
Bleses, D., Makransky, G., Dale, P. S., Højen, A., & Ari, B. A. (2016). Early productive vocabulary predicts academic achievement 10 years later. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(6), 1461–1476. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716416000060
Boden, Z., Larkin, M., & Iyer, M. (2019). Picturing ourselves in the world: Drawings, interpretative phenomenological analysis and the relational mapping interview. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(2), 218–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1540679
Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The Interview Protocol Refinement Framework. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2337
Chen, H. (2023). Multimodal digital storytelling presentations in EFL contexts: learning outcomes, positive/negative affects, and perception between high-/low-achieving learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2255977
Chun, D., Kern, R., & Smith, B. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning. Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12302
Damaianti, V. S., Abidin, Y., & Rahma, R. (2020). Higher order thinking skills-based reading literacy assessment instrument: An Indonesian context. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28600
Dewani, H. W., Sukartiningsih, W., Hendratno, H., & Suryanti, S. (2025). Exploring Reading Interest and reading Literacy of Indonesian Language in Elementary school students: a correlation study. International Journal of Language Education, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v8i4.70003
Dolean, D. D., Lervåg, A., Visu-Petra, L., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2021). Language skills, and not executive functions, predict the development of reading comprehension of early readers: evidence from an orthographically transparent language. Reading and Writing, 34(6), 1491–1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10107-4
Drajati, N. A., Tan, L., Tyarakanita, A., & Wijaya, S. A. (2023). Digital storytelling projects in developing Indonesian EFL pre-service teachers’ metasemiotic awareness and professional competence. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i2.63084
Gustine, G. G., & Insani, H. N. (2019). English students’ experience of reframing narrative stories from a critical literacy perspective. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 691. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15254
Halpin, S. N. (2024). Inter-coder agreement in qualitative coding: Considerations for its use. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 8(3), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/14887
Hasumi, T., & Chiu, M. (2024). Technology-enhanced language learning in English language education: Performance analysis, core publications, and emerging trends. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2346044
Hidayat, N. H., Sundari, H., & Zuhairi, A. (2024). EFL reading comprehension through digital storytelling in multimodal digital literacy. Scope Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(1), 380. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v9i1.24799
Hurry, J., Fridkin, L., & Holliman, A. J. (2021). Reading intervention at age 6: Long‐term effects of Reading Recovery in the UK on qualifications and support at age 16. British Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3752
Hwang, W., Shadiev, R., Hsu, J., Huang, Y., Hsu, G., & Lin, Y. (2014). Effects of storytelling to facilitate EFL speaking using Web-based multimedia system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.927367
Indrayadi, T. (2021). Indonesian EFL Learners’ reading Motivation. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 5(2), 335. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v5i2.745
Khotimah, L. M., & Ningrum, A. S. B. (2022). The Effectiveness of Digital Stotytelling in Teaching Speaking for Students with Different Gender Classification. English Education Journal of English Teaching and Research, 7(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v7i2.18272
Khusnaini, N. (2019). The analysis of teacher talk and the characteristic of classroom interaction in English for young Learner. ELT Forum Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v8i2.32716
Liestari, S. P., & Muhardis, M. (2020). Kemampuan Literasi Membaca Siswa Indonesia (Berdasarkan hasil UN dan PISA). Indonesian Journal of Educational Assesment, 3(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.26499/ijea.v3i1.53
Manihuruk, D. H. (2020). The Correlation between EFL Students’ Vocabulary Knowledge and Reading Comprehension. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 6(1), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v6i1.1264
Muijselaar, M. M. L., Swart, N. M., Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & De Jong, P. F. (2017). Developmental relations between reading comprehension and reading strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763
Muthia, & Pratiwi, S. (2024). Analisis penyebab rendahnya literasi siswa di sekolah dasar. JRGI, 3(3), 177–181.
Novianti, N., Thomas, A., & To, V. (2020). Addressing challenges in the practice of critical literacy in EFL classrooms: A new framework. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i1.25049
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
Oga-Baldwin, W. Q. (2019). Acting, thinking, feeling, making, collaborating: The engagement process in foreign language learning. System, 86, 102128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102128
Ong, C., & Aryadoust, V. (2022). A review of digital storytelling in language learning in children: methods, design and reliability. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18, 011. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18011
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190515000094
Pitoyo, A. (2020). A Meta-Analysis: Factors affecting students’ reading interest in Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(7), 83. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i7.1727
Rahmat, Y. N., Saputra, A., Hakim, M. a. R., Saputra, E., & Serasi, R. (2021). Learning L2 by utilizing dictionary strategies: learner autonomy and learning strategies. Lingua Cultura, 15(2), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v15i2.7339
Reynolds, J., & Lee, M. (2018). Ethical and Methodological Issues Resulting from Recording Lapses in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3218
Robinson, C. (2024). Ethical considerations of children’s involvement in school-based research: balancing children’s provision, protection, and participation rights. Research Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241272872
Rowlands, J. (2021). Interviewee transcript review as a tool to improve data quality and participant confidence in sensitive research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211066170
Schiefele, U., Stutz, F., & Schaffner, E. (2016). Longitudinal relations between reading motivation and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.031
Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2020). Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106586
Schmitz, M., Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., Gonon, P., & Petko, D. (2021). When barriers are not an issue: Tracing the relationship between hindering factors and technology use in secondary schools across Europe. Computers & Education, 179, 104411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104411
Shinas, V. H., & Wen, H. (2022). Preparing teacher candidates to implement digital storytelling. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100079
Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2016). The relation between teachers’ emphasis on the development of students’ digital information and communication skills and computer self-efficacy: the moderating roles of age and gender. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-016-0032-4
Smith, J. A. (2019). Participants and researchers searching for meaning: Conceptual developments for interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(2), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1540648.
Solari, E. J., Kehoe, K. F., Cho, E., Hall, C., Vargas, I., Dahl‐Leonard, K., Richmond, C. L., Henry, A. R., Cook, L., Hayes, L., & Conner, C. (2022). Effectiveness of Interventions for English Learners with Word Reading Difficulties: A Research Synthesis. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 37(3), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12286
Suggate, S., Schaughency, E., McAnally, H., & Reese, E. (2018). From infancy to adolescence: The longitudinal links between vocabulary, early literacy skills, oral narrative, and reading comprehension. Cognitive Development, 47, 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.04.005
Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Liu, T. (2015). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
Tomaszewski, L. E., Zarestky, J., & Gonzalez, E. (2020). Planning Qualitative research: design and decision making for new researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920967174
Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Baran, E., Siddiq, F., Valtonen, T., & Sointu, E. (2019). Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1189–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12748
Toprak-Yildiz, T. E. (2022). Developing a cognitive model of L2 reading comprehension for evaluative purposes in an EMI context. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 75, 101200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101200
Toste, J. R., Didion, L., Peng, P., Filderman, M. J., & McClelland, A. M. (2020). A Meta-Analytic Review of the relations between motivation and reading achievement for K–12 students. Review of Educational Research, 90(3), 420–456. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320919352
Turunen, T., Poskiparta, E., Salmivalli, C., Niemi, P., & Lerkkanen, M. (2021). Longitudinal associations between poor reading skills, bullying and victimization across the transition from elementary to middle school. PLoS ONE, 16(3), e0249112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249112
Vaknin‐Nusbaum, V., Nevo, E., Brande, S., & Gambrell, L. (2017). Developmental aspects of reading motivation and reading achievement among second grade low achievers and typical readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(3), 438–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12117
Van Der Weijden, F. A., Van Den Boer, M., Zijlstra, B. J. H., & De Jong, P. F. (2024). Implementation takes time: Reduction of literacy problems in schools implementing an Early-Literacy intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 18(4), 918–950. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2024.2384365
Wu, J., & Chen, D. V. (2019). A systematic review of educational digital storytelling. Computers & Education, 147, 103786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103786
Xie, K., Nelson, M. J., Cheng, S., & Jiang, Z. (2021). Examining changes in teachers’ perceptions of external and internal barriers in their integration of educational digital resources in K-12 classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(2), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1951404
Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2102
Yuniarti, Y., Yulian, R., & Yuniarti, Y. (2022). Digital story telling based on multimodal elements on EFL learners’ speaking performance. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 11(2), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v11i2.40217
Zein, M. S. (2016). Elementary English education in Indonesia: Policy developments, current practices, and future prospects. English Today, 33(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266078416000407
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Luh Gede Eka Wahyuni, Ni Made Ratminingsih, Made Hery Santosa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with VELES agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citations of published work.
VELES is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


