Burned Out but Not Broken: Teaching Performance Amid Burnout in EFL Practicum Settings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v9i2.29878Keywords:
Pre-service teachers, teaching practicum, burnout, teaching performance, EFLAbstract
Burnout among pre-service teachers has become an increasing concern in teacher education, especially during teaching practicum, which requires high levels of cognitive, emotional, and instructional involvement. Although there is extensive literature on burnout in in-service teachers, little research has examined its relationship with teaching performance among pre-service English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers in Indonesia. This study explores the link between burnout and teaching performance among 45 pre-service EFL teachers at Universitas Islam Nusantara who completed the PLP 2 (Teaching Practicum) programme. Burnout levels were assessed using the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI), while teaching performance was measured with a researcher-developed Pre-service Teacher Performance Assessment Questionnaire (PTPAQ). Both tools were validated and found reliable, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.721 and 0.779, respectively. Because the data were not normally distributed, Spearman’s rho correlation analysis was performed. Results showed a weak and non-significant negative correlation (r = -0.219, p > 0.05) between burnout and teaching performance. These findings indicate that only. Pedagogical competence and support systems influence pre-service teaching performance more than burnout. The study emphasises the importance of teacher education programmes implementing structured mentorship and resilience-building initiatives to improve teaching quality during practicum.
References
Alamri, H. (2018). Challenges in practicum: Views and perceptions of EFL pre-service teachers towards field experience skills in real classrooms. Arab World English Journal, 9(1), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no1.11
Allen, J. M., & Wright, S. E. (2013). Integrating theory and practice in the pre-service teacher education practicum. Teachers and Teaching, 20(2), 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.848568
Arshavskaya, E. (2016). Complexity in mentoring in a pre-service teacher practicum: a case study approach. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 5(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmce-07-2015-0021
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2016). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
Burns, R. W., & Badiali, B. J. (2015). When supervision is conflated with evaluation: Teacher candidates’ perceptions of their novice supervisor. Action in Teacher Education, 37(4), 418–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2015.1078757
Caughlan, S., & Jiang, H. (2014). Observation and teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(5), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114541546
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
De Neve, D., Devos, G., & Tuytens, M. (2014). The importance of job resources and self-efficacy for beginning teachers’ professional learning in differentiated instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.003
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Vardakou, I., & Kantas, A. (2003). The convergent validity of two burnout instruments: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.19.1.12
Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Eva, A. L. (2022). Surviving teacher burnout: A weekly guide to build resilience, deal with emotional exhaustion, and stay inspired in the classroom—New Harbinger Publications.
Fan, Y., & Xie, Z. (2024). Exploring preservice EFL teacher anxiety in the teaching Practicum: An ecological case study in China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34(2), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00887-6
Fernet, C., Guay, F., Senécal, C., & Austin, S. (2012). Predicting intraindividual changes in teacher burnout: The role of perceived school environment and motivational factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 514–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.11.013
Fiorilli, C., Buonomo, I., Romano, L., Passiatore, Y., Iezzi, D. F., Santoro, P. E., Benevene, P., & Pepe, A. (2020). Teacher Confidence in Professional Training: The Predictive roles of engagement and burnout. Sustainability, 12(16), 6345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166345
Fischetti, J., Ledger, S., Lynch, D., & Donnelly, D. (2021). -Practice before practicum: Simulation in initial teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 57(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2021.1973167
Friedman, I. A. (2000). Burnout in teachers: Shattered dreams of impeccable professional performance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(5), 595–606. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(200005)56:5
Frontier, T., & Mielke, P. (2016). Making teachers better, not bitter: Balancing evaluation, supervision, and reflection for professional growth. ASCD.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson.
Geng, G., Midford, R., & Buckworth, J. (2015). Investigating the stress levels of early childhood, primary and secondary pre-service teachers during teaching Practicum. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 17(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2015-0003
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 25 step by step: A Simple Guide and Reference (15th ed.). Routledge.
Giles, M., Baker, S. F., & Willis, J. M. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ peer mentoring experience and its influence on technology proficiency. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 28(5), 602–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2020.1859329
Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Demerouti, E. (2005). The construct validity of an alternative measure of burnout: Investigating the English translation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory. Work & Stress, 19(3), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370500340728
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualising stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the Nested‐Self in the stress Process: Advancing Conservation of Resources Theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00062
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of Resources in the Organisational Context: The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
Holmström, A., Tuominen, H., Laasanen, M., & Veermans, M. (2023). Teachers’ work engagement and burnout profiles: Associations with sense of efficacy and interprofessional collaboration in school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104251
Hourani, R. B. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ reflection: perception, preparedness and challenges. Reflective Practice, 14(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2012.732947
Ivanec, T. P. (2020). Exploring pre-service teachers’ emotional competence and motivation for the choice of a teaching career. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(12), 230–245.
Jomuad, P., Leah, M., Cericos, E., Bacus, J., Vallejo, J., Dionio, B., Bazar, J., Cocolan, J., & Clarin, A. (2021). Teachers’ workload, burnout, and work performance. International Journal of Educational Policy Research and Review, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.15739/ijeprr.21.007
Kabilan, M. K. (2013). A phenomenological study of an international teaching practicum: Pre-service teachers’ professional development experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.013
Kabilan, M. K., Ramdani, J. M., Mydin, A., & Junaedi, R. (2020). International teaching practicum: Challenges faced by pre-service EFL teachers in ESL settings. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 13(1), 114–126.
Köksal, D. (2019). Learning while teaching: Student teachers’ reflections on their teaching practicum. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(3), 895–913. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.631531
Korucu-Kış, S. (2021). Preparing student teachers for real classrooms through virtual vicarious experiences of critical incidents during remote practicum: A meaningful-experiential learning perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6949–6971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10555-7
Küçük, O. (2023). Preservice English teachers’ burnout levels and motivations to choose the teaching career. Turkish Journal of Education, 12(4), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.1205560
Kulavuz-onal, D., & Tatar, S. (2017). Teacher burnout and participation in professional learning activities: Perspectives from university English language instructors in Turkey. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 283-303.
Kuswandono, P. (2014). Voices of pre-service English teachers: Reflecting motivations during practicum learning. TEFLIN Journal - a Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 25(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v25i2/185-202
Mahmoudi, F., & Ÿzkan, Y. (2016). Practicum stress and coping strategies of pre-service English language teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 232, 494–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.067
Manasia, L., Ianos, M. G., & Chicioreanu, T. D. (2019). Pre-service teacher preparedness for fostering education for sustainable development: An empirical analysis of central dimensions of teaching readiness. Sustainability, 12(1), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010166
Mancini, G., Mameli, C., & Biolcati, R. (2022). Burnout in Italian primary teachers: The predictive effects of trait emotional intelligence, trait anxiety, and job instability. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 18(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.2685
Marino, M. P., & Crocco, M. S. (2019). The pre-service practicum experience and inquiry-oriented pedagogy: Evidence from student teachers’ lesson planning. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 44(1), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2019.02.001
Martins, M., Costa, J., & Onofre, M. (2014). Practicum experiences as sources of pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.968705
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311
Maulina, M., & Rusli, T. I. (2019). Pre-service teachers' performance in implementing teaching methods at the TEFL class. Klasikal Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science, 1(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.52208/klasikal.v1i1.6
Mirabbasi, R., Ahmadi, F., & Jhajharia, D. (2020). Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for trend identification in groundwater levels in Sirjan plain aquifer, Iran. Hydrology Research, 51(6), 1455-1477. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2020.041
Mtika, P. (2011). Trainee teachers’ experiences of teaching practicum: Issues, challenges, and new possibilities. Africa Education Review, 8(3), 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2011.618715
Mutlu, G. (2014). Challenges in practicum: Pre-Service and cooperating teachers’ voices. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(36), 1–7.
Prastikawati, E. F., Mujiyanto, J., Saleh, M., & WuliFitriati, S. (2022). Pre-service EFL teachers’ conceptions of assessment during their teaching practicum. KnE Social Sciences, 7(19), 615–626. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i19.12480
Qin, L., Lu, J., Zhou, Y., Wijaya, T. T., Huang, Y., & Fauziddin, M. (2022). Reduction of academic burnout in preservice teachers: PLS-SEM approach. Sustainability, 14(20), 13416. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013416
Richards, J. (2012). Teacher stress and coping strategies: A national snapshot. The Educational Forum, 76(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2012.682837
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D (Revisi). Alfabeta.
Taherdoost, H. (2019). What is the best response scale for survey and questionnaire design? Review of different lengths of rating scale/attitude scale/and Likert scale. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 8.
Tasdemir, M. Z., Iqbal, M. Z., & Asghar, M. Z. (2020). A study of the significant factors affecting pre-service teacher education in Turkey. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42, 79-100.
Xing, Z. (2022). English as a foreign language teachers’ work engagement, burnout, and professional identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.916079
Zhao, H., & Zhang, X. (2017). The influence of field teaching practice on pre-service Teachers’ Professional Identity: A Mixed methods study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01264
Zito, S., Petrovic, J., Böke, B. N., Sadowski, I., Carsley, D., & Heath, N. L. (2024). Exploring the stress management and well-being needs of pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 152, 104805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104805
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vanesya Eltriyana Asyifa Rinjani, Majmu'atil Husni, Muhammad Andriana Gaffar, Riki Ruswandi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with VELES agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citations of published work.
VELES is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.