Post-Pandemic Shifts in English Language Teaching: Challenges and Perceptions in Online Learning Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i1.25678Keywords:
English Language Teaching, Online Learning, post-pandemic, perceptions, challengesAbstract
Online learning has significantly transformed lecturers' methodologies and students' learning experiences in English Language Teaching (ELT). This qualitative case study explores the perceptions and challenges of online ELT in the post-pandemic context, aiming to inform the design of effective future online learning environments. Data were gathered through document analysis, unstructured questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews with six lecturers and ninety students from the English Language Education Study Program at Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar. Findings indicate that online ELT has enhanced flexibility and accessibility, boosting learners' self-confidence and fostering self-directed and reflective learning through structured educational presentations. However, challenges persist, including the need for lecturers to maintain student engagement and provide effective feedback online, ensuring that even disengaged students participate actively. Additionally, the objectivity of online assessments and the technological divide are critical concerns. The study underscores the necessity of meticulously addressing these challenges and perceptions to cultivate more dynamic and inclusive online ELT classrooms in the future.
References
Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 3–31). Edmonton: AU Press, Athabasca University.
Bach, S., Haynes, P., & Lewis, J. (2007). Online learning and teaching in higher education. New York: Open University Press.
Baldwin, S. J., & Ching, Y. (2019). Guidelines for designing online courses for mobile devices. TechTrends. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00463-6
Baleni, Z. G. (2015). Online formative assessment in higher education: Its pros and cons. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(4), 228–236.
Balula, A., & Moreira, A. (2014). Evaluation of online higher education: Learning, interaction and technology. New York: Springer International Publishing.
Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (2014). Teaching STEM in the secondary school: Helping teachers meet the challenge. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Basko, L., & Hartman, J. (2017). Increasing student engagement through paired technologies. Journal of Instructional Research, 6(1), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.9743/jir.2017.4
Bonk, C. J., & Zhang, K. (2008). Empowering online learning: 100+ activities for reading, reflecting, displaying, and doing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Budiarta, I. K., Artini, L. P., Padmadewi, N. N., & Nitiasih, P. K. (2023). CLIL in the online micro-teaching: Factors affecting content and language achievement. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(2), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.2.3
Budiarta, I. K., & Santosa, M. H. (2020). TPS-Flipgrid: Transforming EFL speaking class in the 21st century. English Review: Journal of English Education, 9(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v9i1.3801
Buss, R. R., Lindsey, L., Foulger, T. S., Wetzel, K., & Pasquel, S. (2017). Assessing a technology infusion approach in a teacher preparation program. Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 33–44.
Cheng, X. (2020). Challenges of “school’s out, but class’s on” to school education: Practical exploration of chinese schools during the Covid-19 pandemic. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 5(2), 501–516. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.20.ar043
Conrad, R.M., & Donaldson, J. A. (2004). Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Creighton, T. (2018). Digital natives, digital immigrants, digital learners: An international empirical integrative review of the literature. Education Leadership Review, 19(1), 132–140.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Dieterich, C., & Hamsher, S. (2020). Maximizing online instructional pedagogy in teacher education courses for career changers. Journal of Educators Online, 17(1).
Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2007). How to teach english with technology. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Eisenbach, B. B., Greathouse, P., & Acquaviva, C. (2020). Covid-19, middle level teacher candidates, and colloquialisms: Navigating emergency remote field experiences. Middle Grades Review, 6(2), 1–5.
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2016). Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Finkelstein, J. (2006). Learning in real time: Synchronous teaching and learning online. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Ha, Y., & Im, H. (2020). The role of an interactive visual learning tool and its personalizability in online learning: Flow experience. Online Learning Journal, 24(1), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i1.1620
Hakami, M. (2020). Using nearpod as a tool to promote active learning in higher education in a BYOD Learning Environment. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v9n1p119
Hall, G. (2011). Exploring English language teaching: Language in action. Oxon: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Harasim, L. (2017). Learning theory and online technologies (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English (New Editio). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Haverback, H. R. (2020). Middle level teachers quarantine, teach, and increase self-efficacy beliefs: Using theory to build practice during Covid-19. Middle Grades Review, 6(2), 1–6.
Heugh, K., French, M., Armitage, J., Taylor-Leech, K., Billinghurst, N., & Ollerhead, S. (2019). Using multilingual approaches: Moving from theory to practice. London: British Council.
Howlett, G., & Waemusa, Z. (2018). Digital native/digital immigrant divide: EFL teachers’ mobile device experiences and practice. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(4), 374–389. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.471007
Khan, S., & Khan, R. A. (2018). Online assessments: Exploring perspectives of university students. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 661–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9797-0
Korbuakaew, T., Robroo, I., & Korbuakaew, S. (2022). The development of online active learning management with application for pre-service teachers. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(1), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.1.1589
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd., Publishers.
Krajcso, Z., & Frimmel, U. (2017). Retrieving online language learning resources: Classification and quality. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050102
Laily, F. N., Suparno, S., & Ngadiso, N. (2023). Classroom-based assessment practices during the Covid-19 outbreak in Indonesia: EFL students’ perceptions and challenges. VELES: Voices of English Language Education Society, 7(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v7i1.7088
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques & principles in language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Long, H. B. (2004). E-learning: An introduction. In G. M. Piskurich (Ed.), Getting the most from online learning (pp. 7–23). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Macdonald, J. (2008). Blended learning and online tutoring: Planning learner support and activity design (2nd ed.). Hampshire: Gower Publishing Company.
Mahayanti, N. W. S., Putro, N. H. P. S., Widodo, P., & Alonzo, D. (2023). Scales of online learning readiness: Empirical validation of factors affecting EFL learners in online learning during covid-19 pandemic. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching, 7(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v7i1.907
McAvinia, C. (2016). Online learning and its users: Lessons for higher education. Cambridge: Chandos Publishing.
Mehall, S. (2020). Purposeful interpersonal interaction in online learning: What is it and how is it measured? Online Learning Journal, 24(1), 182–204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i1.2002
Moore, D. R. (2009). Designing online learning with Flash. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Nunan, D. (1992). Research method in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom (2nd ed.). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Riegel, C., & Mete, R. (2017). Educational technologies for K-12 learners: What digital natives and digital immigrants can teach one another. Educational Planning, 24(4), 49–58.
Schaefer, M. B., Abrams, S., Kurpis, M., Abrams, M., & Abrams, C. (2020). “Making the unusual usual:” Students’ perspectives and experiences of learning at home during the Covid-19 pandemic. Middle Grades Review, 6(2), 1–18.
Shank, P., & Sitze, A. (2004). Making sense of online learning: A guide for beginners and the truly skeptical. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Tuilan, J. (2023). Self-regulated learning In blended learning environment. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching, 8(2), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v8i2.1381
Wang, Y., & Chen, D.-T. (2017). Assessing online discussions: A holistic approach. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239517717036
Weller, M. (2002). Delivering learning on the net: The why, what & how of online education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Yang, D., Lavonen, J. M., & Niemi, H. (2019). Online learning engagement: Critical factors and research evidence from literature. Themes in ELearning, 11(1), 1–18.
Yao, J., Rao, J., Jiang, T., & Xiong, C. (2020). What role should teachers play in online teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic? evidence from China. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 5(2), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.20.ar035
Yoon, B. (2020). The global pandemic as learning opportunities about the world: Extending school curriculum. Middle Grades Review, 6(2), 1–7.
Yu, E. (2020). Student-inspired optimal design of online learning for generation Z. Journal of Educators Online, 17(1), 1–11.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2024-09-06 (2)
- 2024-09-28 (2)
- 2024-04-29 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 I Komang Budiarta, Ni Wayan Krismayani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the VELES Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
VELES Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
