EFL Teacher Intervention in Mediating Students’ Interaction in Web-Based Collaborative Writing Environment Using Google Docs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v7i1.7912Keywords:
Collaboration, Google Docs, Interaction, Teacher Intervention, Web-based Collaborative WritingAbstract
The level of teacher’s assistance in web-based collaborative writing activities affected students’ collaboration and non-collaboration. Therefore, the teacher’s role in enhancing students’ active learning was inseparable. This study focused on the EFL teacher moves in facilitating groups’ work of writing using web-based tool, Google Docs to support online learning. Conducting collaborative work in writing technology was valuable for promoting students’ participation and collaboration. The participant in this qualitative research case study was an EFL teacher at an Indonesian vocational high school. The data was based on a semi-structured interview and document analysis of students’ worksheet and teacher-students’ written conversation in Google Docs. The findings showed that web-based medium facilitated the teacher assisted the students’ engagement through organisational, socio-cognitive, and socio-affective in collaborative writing environment. Significantly, the teacher favorably convenience to deliver electronic feedback and monitoring students’ progress quickly. Unfortunately, students’ issues (e.g. less collaboration, cheated on the internet), and technical issues (e.g. unstable internet connection, low devices’ specification) were commonly problems encountered by the teacher. Google Docs as a web-based medium was valuable to help the teacher in creating groups’ work in teaching online writing. This research implies that the teacher might be more concerned on selecting appropriate types of intervention and utilize suitable media to support teaching’s styles by enriching technology skills’ training. In addition, students could enjoyed and acquired benefits from having the teacher's help to be more collaboratively work in constructing text with their teammates.
References
Al Shabibi, Y. (2018). Teacher ’ s Role in A Collaborative Writing Environment Using Wiki. University of Exeter.
Alghasab, M. (2015). Student-student collaboration in wiki mediated collaborative writing activities: Exploring EFL teachers’ roles in the collaborative process (Issue October) [University of York Education]. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1827871697?accountid=10673%0Ahttp://openurl.ac.uk/redirect/athens:edu/?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dissertations+%26+theses&sid=ProQ:ProQuest+Dissertations+%26+Theses+Global&a
Alghasab, M., Hardman, J., & Handley, Z. (2019). Teacher-student interaction on wikis: Fostering collaborative learning and writing. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.12.002
Alharbi, M. A., & Alqefari, A. N. (2021). The Impact of Teacher Feedback Via Google Doc in L2 Learners ’ Writing. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(11), 170–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.11.10
Alsubaie, J., & Ashuraidah, A. (2017). Exploring Writing Individually and Collaboratively Using Google Docs in EFL Contexts. English Language Teaching, 10(10), 10. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n10p10
Amalia, H., Abdullah, F., & Fatimah, A. S. (2021). Teaching writing to junior high school students: A focus on challenges and solutions. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 794–810. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.904066
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology; in Qualittaive Research in Psychology. Uwe Bristol, 3(2), 77–101. http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/11735
Brodahl, C., & Hansen, N. K. (2014). Education Students ’ Use of Collaborative Writing Tools in Collectively Reflective Essay Papers. 13, 91–120.
Creswell, J. W., & Cresswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Fernández Dobao, A., & Blum, A. (2013). Collaborative writing in pairs and small groups: Learners’ attitudes and perceptions. System, 41(2), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.02.002
Irshad, M. (2021). Challenges Encountered During Synchronous Online Collaborative Writing via Google Docs. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 17(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijwltt.287554
Jeong, K. O. (2016). A study on the integration of google docs as a web-based collaborative learning platform in EFL writing instruction. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(39). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i39/103239
Khalil, Z. M. (2018). EFL Students’ Perceptions towards Using Google Docs and Google Classroom as Online Collaborative Tools in Learning Grammar. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, October 2018. https://doi.org/10.14744/alrj.2018.47955
Kim, J. (2020). Learning and Teaching Online During Covid-19: Experiences of Student Teachers in an Early Childhood Education Practicum. International Journal of Early Childhood, 52(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-020-00272-6
Krishnan, J., Cusimano, A., Wang, D., & Yim, S. (2018). Writing Together: Online Synchronous Collaboration in Middle School. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 62(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.871
Leeuwen, A. Van, & Janssen, J. (2019). A Systematic Review of Teacher Guidance During Collaborative Learning in Primary and Secondary Education. February. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.001
Mangenot, F., & Nissen, E. (2006). Collective Activity and Tutor Involvement in E-learning Environments for Language Teachers and Learners. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 601–622. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v23i3.601-622
Nabhan, S., & Sa’diyah, H. (2021). Collaborative Writing Using Google Docs in an EFL Classroom: Voices from High School Students. VELES Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(2), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v5i2.3863
Nguyen, L. Van. (2011). Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning in a Vietnamese Tertiary EFL Context: Process, Product, and Learners’ Perceptions. Applied Linguistics, PhD Thesis.
Poorebrahim, F. (2017). Indirect written corrective feedback, revision, and learning. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v6i2.4843
S
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the VELES Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
VELES Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.