Strategic Knowledge as a Selective Mechanism of Pedagogical Reasoning among Experienced EFL Lecturers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v10i2.35596Keywords:
EFL teachers, Indonesian higher education, pedagogical content knowledge, pedagogical reasoning and action, strategic knowledge, teacher cognition, PCK developmentAbstract
Strategic knowledge remains underexamined in EFL research and is often conflated with ordinary instructional adaptation. This qualitative multiple-case study examined how strategic knowledge shaped pedagogical reasoning and potential pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) development among five experienced EFL lecturers across five subject areas at an Indonesian state university. Data were collected over one semester using Content Representations (CoRes), Pedagogical and Professional-experience Repertoires (PaP-eRs), ten classroom observations, and post-observation interviews; detailed reasoning-chain analysis centred on CoRe and PaP-eR evidence. Framework-guided thematic analysis integrated within-case reconstruction of planned and enacted reasoning with cross-case synthesis based on Shulman’s model and six strategic-knowledge indicators. All teachers calibrated content to perceived learner characteristics, adapted instructional representations, and staged small-group-to-whole-class activities. However, the uniformity of these practices was more consistent with professional routines than with strategic knowledge. Stronger evidence emerged only when teachers recognized a conflict between pedagogical principles, diagnosed the resulting misalignment, and constructed a non-routine response. The analysis yielded a tentative four-phase sequence—evaluation, strategic diagnosis, alternative construction, and implementation—strongly evidenced in two cases, partially in one, weakly in one, and absent in one; implementation was confirmed in only one case. The findings position strategic knowledge as a selective and unevenly visible mechanism of pedagogical reasoning rather than an automatic attribute of experience. Only one case provided moderate, self-reported evidence of enacted PCK revision, underscoring the need for longitudinal corroboration.
References
Alonzo, A. C., & Kim, J. (2016). Declarative and dynamic pedagogical content knowledge as elicited through two video-based interview methods. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(8), 1259–1286. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21271
Amador, J. M., Park Rogers, M. A., Hudson, R., Phillips, A., Carter, I., Galindo, E., & Akerson, V. L. (2022). Novice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for planning and implementing mathematics and science lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 115, Article 103736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103736
Anderson, J. (2025). Language teacher expertise research: A theoretical case and research agenda. Language Teaching, 58(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444824000168
Anderson, J., & Taner, G. (2023). Building the expert teacher prototype: A metasummary of teacher expertise studies in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 38, 100485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100485
Anthony, G., Hunter, J., & Hunter, R. (2015). Prospective teachers’ development of adaptive expertise. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.03.010
Ashton, K. (2022). Language teacher agency in emergency online teaching. System, 105, Article 102713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102713
Babichenko, M., Segal, A., & Asterhan, C. S. C. (2021). Associations between problem framing and teacher agency in school-based workgroup discussions of problems of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, Article 103417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103417
Bakker, C., de Glopper, K., & de Vries, S. (2022). Noticing as reasoning in Lesson Study teams in initial teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 113, Article 103656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103656
Barendsen, E., & Henze, I. (2019). Relating teacher PCK and teacher practice using classroom observation. Research in Science Education, 49(5), 1141–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9637-z
Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. A. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers’ ability to attend, analyze, and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.005
Bastian, A., Kaiser, G., Meyer, D., Schwarz, B., & König, J. (2022). Teacher noticing and its growth toward expertise: An expert–novice comparison with pre-service and in-service secondary mathematics teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110, 205–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10128-y
Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Borda, E., Schumacher, E., Hanley, D., Geary, E., Warren, S., Ipsen, C., & Stredicke, L. (2020). Initial implementation of active learning strategies in large, lecture STEM courses: Lessons learned from a multi-institutional, interdisciplinary STEM faculty development program. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-0203-2
Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2019). Language learner autonomy in a tertiary context: Teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 9–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817725759
Bowers, N., Merritt, E. G., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2020). Exploring teacher adaptive expertise in the context of elementary school science reforms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(1), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1651613
Brown, B., & Friesen, S. (2025). Stages of teaching expertise from routine to adaptive: A model for advancing teaching effectiveness. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 87, Article 101530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101530
Caspari-Gnann, I., & Sevian, H. (2022). Teacher dilemmas as sources of change and development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, Article 103629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103629
Chan, K. K. H., & Yung, B. H. W. (2015). On-site pedagogical content knowledge development. International Journal of Science Education, 37(8), 1246–1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1033777
Delgado-Rebolledo, R., & Zakaryan, D. (2020). Relationships between the knowledge of practices in mathematics and the pedagogical content knowledge of a mathematics lecturer. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(3), 567–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09977-0
Ding, A.-C., & Wang, H.-H. (2018). Unpacking teacher candidates’ decision-making and justifications in dilemmatic spaces during the student teaching year. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46(3), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2018.1442916
Forsler, A., Nilsson, P., & Walan, S. (2024). Capturing and developing teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in sustainable development using content representation and video-based reflection. Research in Science Education, 54, 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10149-y
Fraser, S. P. (2016). Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Exploring its usefulness for science lecturers in higher education. Research in Science Education, 46(1), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9459-1
Gold, B., & Holodynski, M. (2015). Development and construct validation of a situational judgment test of strategic knowledge of classroom management in elementary schools. Educational Assessment, 20(3), 226–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2015.1062087
Han, J., Zhao, Y., Liu, M., & Zhang, J. (2021). The development of college English teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): From General English to English for Academic Purposes. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(4), 609–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09689-7
Kavanagh, S. S., Conrad, J., & Dagogo-Jack, S. (2020). From rote to reasoned: Examining the role of pedagogical reasoning in practice-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, Article 102991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102991
Kubanyiova, M., & Feryok, A. (2015). Language teacher cognition in applied linguistics research: Revisiting the territory, redrawing the boundaries, reclaiming the relevance. The Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12239
Kuhn, C., Alonzo, A. C., & Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O. (2016). Evaluating the pedagogical content knowledge of pre- and in-service teachers of business and economics to ensure quality of classroom practice in vocational education and training. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 8, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-016-0031-2
Le, M. D., Nguyen, H. T. M., & Burns, A. (2021). English primary teacher agency in implementing teaching methods in response to language policy reform: A Vietnamese case study. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1–2), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1741209
Lee, I., & Yuan, R. (2021). Understanding L2 writing teacher expertise. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, Article 100755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100755
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Liu, Y., & Ren, W. (2024). Task-based language teaching in a local EFL context: Chinese university teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 28(6), 2234–2250. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211044247
Loughran, J. (2019). Pedagogical reasoning: The foundation of the professional knowledge of teaching. Teachers and Teaching, 25(5), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1633294
Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370–391. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20007
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350
Männikkö, I., & Husu, J. (2019). Examining teachers’ adaptive expertise through personal practical theories. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.016
Mazibe, E. N., Coetzee, C., & Gaigher, E. (2020). A comparison between reported and enacted pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) about graphs of motion. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 941–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9718-7
Munson, J., Baldinger, E. E., & Larison, S. (2021). What if … ? Exploring thought experiments and non-rehearsing teachers’ development of adaptive expertise in rehearsal debriefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, Article 103222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103222
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
Pang, M. (2016). Pedagogical reasoning in EFL/ESL teaching: Revisiting the importance of teaching lesson planning in second language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.283
Parsons, S. A., Vaughn, M., Scales, R. Q., Gallagher, M. A., Parsons, A. W., Davis, S. G., Pierczynski, M., & Allen, M. (2018). Teachers’ instructional adaptations: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 205–242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317743198
Patzak, A., & Zhang, X. (2025). Blending teacher autonomy support and provision of structure in the classroom for optimal motivation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 37, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-09994-2
Petersen, C. I., Baepler, P., Beitz, A., Ching, P., Gorman, K. S., Neudauer, C. L., Rozaitis, W., Walker, J. D., & Wingert, D. (2020). The tyranny of content: “Content coverage” as a barrier to evidence-based teaching approaches and ways to overcome it. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(2), Article ar17. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-04-0079
Pun, J., & Macaro, E. (2019). The effect of first and second language use on question types in English medium instruction science classrooms in Hong Kong. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1510368
Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2021). Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1862657
Robinson, O. C. (2023). Probing in qualitative research interviews: Theory and practice. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 20(3), 382–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2023.2238625
Roos, H., & Bagger, A. (2024). Ethical dilemmas and professional judgment as a pathway to inclusion and equity in mathematics teaching. ZDM—Mathematics Education, 56(3), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01540-0
Santagata, R., & Yeh, C. (2016). The role of perception, interpretation, and decision making in the development of beginning teachers’ competence. ZDM—Mathematics Education, 48(1–2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0737-9
Sarkar, M., Gutierrez-Bucheli, L., Yip, S. Y., Lazarus, M., Wright, C., White, P. J., Ilic, D., Hiscox, T. J., & Berry, A. (2024). Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in higher education: A systematic scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 144, Article 104608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104608
Sato, M., & Oyanedel, J. C. (2019). “I think that is a better way to teach but …”: EFL teachers’ conflicting beliefs about grammar teaching. System, 84, 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.06.005
Shadle, S. E., Marker, A., & Earl, B. (2017). Faculty drivers and barriers: Laying the groundwork for undergraduate STEM education reform in academic departments. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0062-7
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Stahnke, R., Schüler, S., & Rösken-Winter, B. (2016). Teachers’ perception, interpretation, and decision-making: A systematic review of empirical mathematics education research. ZDM—Mathematics Education, 48(1–2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0775-y
Suh, J. K., & Park, S. (2017). Exploring the relationship between pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and sustainability of an innovative science teaching approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.021
Vázquez-Bernal, B., Mellado, V., & Jiménez-Pérez, R. (2022). The long road to shared PCK: A science teacher’s personal journey. Research in Science Education, 52, 1807–1828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10028-4
Wang, L., Lee, I., & Park, M. (2020). Chinese university EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices of classroom writing assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100890
Weng, Z. (2025). Investigating routine and adaptive expertise of experienced teachers in English for academic purposes writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 77, 101566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101566
Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2017). See and tell: Differences between expert and novice teachers’ interpretations of problematic classroom management events. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.015
Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2021). Classroom management scripts: A theoretical model contrasting expert and novice teachers’ knowledge and awareness of classroom events. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09542-0
Wolff, C. E., van den Bogert, N., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2015). Keeping an eye on learning: Differences between expert and novice teachers’ representations of classroom management events. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114549810
Worden, D. (2018). Mediation and development of a novice L2 writing teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge of genre. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 34, 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.005
Worden, D. (2019). Developing L2 writing teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of genre through the unfamiliar genre project. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, Article 100667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100667
Wu, P., & Yu, S. (2017). Developing pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) through module team collaboration: A case study of business English teachers in China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(1–2), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0330-9
Wu, P., Yu, S., & Zhang, L. (2019). The function and integration of components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in classroom teaching: A case study of business English teachers. Educational Studies, 45(4), 440–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1509770
Wu, X. M., Zhang, L. J., & Dixon, H. R. (2021). Implementing assessment for learning (AfL) in Chinese university EFL classes: Teachers’ values and practices. System, 101, 102589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102589
Xiang, X., Chang, P., & Yu, B. (2022). Exploring an EAP writing teacher’s adaptive expertise and adaptive teaching practices from a complex dynamic systems theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 957429. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.957429
Yang, H., & Clarke, M. (2018). Spaces of agency within contextual constraints: A case study of teacher’s response to EFL reform in a Chinese university. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1460252
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zhang, H., Oliver, M., Littlejohn, A., & Henry, J. (2025). Expanding adaptive teacher expertise in higher education: Using breakdowns and repairs to reinterpret teachers’ improvisation as a sociomaterial practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 165, Article 105110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105110
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sumarta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with VELES agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citations of published work.
VELES is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
