Integrating Gligglish AI into Project-Based Learning to Improve Speaking Skills of Non-English Major EFL Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v9i3.32518Keywords:
Project-Based Learning (PBL), speaking skills, Gligglish AI, EFLAbstract
This study examines the effectiveness of integrating Project-Based Learning (PBL) with Gligglish AI in improving the English-speaking skills of second-semester students in the Information Systems Research Program at a private university in Indonesia. In this context, many students experience persistent challenges in speaking development, including linguistic difficulties such as limited vocabulary, grammatical control, and pronunciation accuracy, as well as psychological barriers such as low self-confidence and fear of making mistakes. The study employed a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-test assessments using a validated speaking performance rubric. In contrast, qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews to explore students’ learning experiences and perceptions. The instructional intervention involved implementing Project-Based Learning activities supported by Gligglish AI, which facilitated interactive speaking practice, pronunciation feedback, and opportunities for autonomous learning. The participants were two intact classes (n = 52), divided into an experimental and a control group. The quantitative findings indicate substantial improvements in students’ speaking performance following the intervention, with fluency increasing by 31.4%, pronunciation by 28.6%, grammar by 24.8%, and vocabulary by 26.7%. The most pronounced improvement was observed in overall speaking performance, which increased by 47.8% from the pre-test to the post-test. Qualitative findings further reveal that students perceived the integration of PBL and Gligglish AI as engaging, relevant to their academic field, and effective in enhancing confidence, motivation, and active participation. These findings suggest that integrating AI-assisted speaking tools within a project-based learning framework offers a promising instructional approach for improving English-speaking skills in private higher education contexts.
References
Bakar, N. I. A., Noordin, N., & Razali, A. B. (2019). Improving oral communicative competence in English using Project-Based learning activities. English Language Teaching, 12(4), 73. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n4p73
Bashori, M., Van Hout, R., Strik, H., & Cucchiarini, C. (2021). Effects of ASR-based websites on EFL learners’ vocabulary, speaking anxiety, and language enjoyment. System, 99, 102496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102496
Bazeley, P. (2024). Conceptualizing integration in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(3), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898241253636
Bhatnagar, R., Tanguay, C., Sullivan, C., & Many, J. (2021). Observation of field Practice rubric: Establishing content validity and reliability. Georgia Educational Researcher, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ger.2021.180201
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806
Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The Interview Protocol Refinement Framework. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2337
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., & Giovando, G. (2023). Digital workplace and organization performance: Moderating role of digital leadership capability. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), 100334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100334
Cook, T. D., Zhu, N., Klein, A., Starkey, P., & Thomas, J. (2020). How much bias results if a quasi-experimental design combines local comparison groups, a pretest outcome measure and other covariates? A within-study comparison of preschool effects. Psychological Methods, 25, 726–746. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000260
D’Attoma, I., Camillo, F., & Clark, M. H. (2017). A Comparison of Bias Reduction Methods: Clustering versus Propensity Score Subclassification and Weighting. The Journal of Experimental Education, 87(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1391161
De Jong, N. H. (2018). Fluency in second language testing: insights from different disciplines. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2018.1477780
Dennis, N. K. (2024). Using AI-powered speech recognition technology to improve English pronunciation and speaking skills. IAFOR Journal of Education, 12(2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.12.2.05
Deschênes, A. (2023). Digital literacy, the use of collaborative technologies, and perceived social proximity in a hybrid work environment: Technology as a social binder. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 13, 100351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100351
Dong, N., & Lipsey, M. W. (2018). Can Propensity Score analysis approximate randomized experiments using pretest and demographic information in Pre-K intervention research? Evaluation Review, 42(1), 34–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x17749824
Ekayati, R., Manurung, I. D., & Yenni, E. (2020). Need analysis of esp for non-English study program. language literacy Journal of Linguistics Literature and Language Teaching, 4(2), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v4i2.3152
Ginusti, G. N. (2023). The Implementation of Digital Technology in Online Project-Based Learning during Pandemic: EFL Students’ Perspectives. J-SHMIC Journal of English for Academic, 10(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2023.vol10(1).10220
Guaillas Gualán, G. M., & Armijos Ramírez, M. R. (2024). Uso de la aplicación Gliglish en las habilidades de habla inglesa entre estudiantes de educación secundaria superior en una institución pública (Using Gliglish Application on English speaking skills among upper secondary education students at a public institution). Revista Científica Multidisciplinar G-nerando, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.60100/rcmg.v5i2.386 DOI
Gualán, G. M. G., & Ramírez, M. R. A. (2024). Uso de la aplicación Gliglish en las habilidades de habla inglesa entre estudiantes de educación secundaria superior en una institución pública. Revista Científica Multidisciplinar G-nerando, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.60100/rcmg.v5i2.386
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Hidayatullah, N. E. (2024). The impact of TalkPal.AI on English speaking proficiency: an academic inquiry. Journal of Insan Mulia Education, 2(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.59923/joinme.v2i1.98
Hofweber, J. & Jaworska, S. (2022). Polite impoliteness? How power, gender and language background shape request strategies in English as a Business Lingua Franca (BELF) in corporate email exchanges. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 11(2), 223-253. https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2022-2085
Hwang, G., Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2024). Enhancing EFL learners’ speaking skills, foreign language enjoyment, and language-specific grit utilising the affordances of a MALL app: A microgenetic perspective. Computers & Education, 214, 105015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105015
Iswati, L., & Triastuti, A. (2021). Voicing the challenges of ESP teaching: Lessons from ESP in non-English departments. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 276–293. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.17301
Jackson-Gordon, R., & Clark, V. L. P. (2023). Using a joint display for building integration in a sequential study: informing data collection for a participatory second phase. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231179848
Junining, E., Alif, S., & Setiarini, N. (2020). Automatic speech recognition in computer-assisted language learning for individual learning in speaking. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 5(2), 219–223. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v5i2.867
Kafryawan, W. (2023). The effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) by smartphones to increase English proficiency of Papuan EFL students. ENGLISH FRANCA Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 7(1), 217. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v7i1.7090
Khalizah, N., & Damanik, E. S. D. (2024). ELSA speak: Piquing demotivated students to self-improve their pronunciation with an AI-powered English speaking coach. ELSYA Journal of English Language Studies, 6(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v6i1.18727
Khoudri, I. (2024). Revolutionizing English Language Learning with AI: Boosting Student Receptive and Productive Skills. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences (PJLSS), 22(2). https://doi.org/10.57239/pjlss-2024-22.2.00115
Lou, L., Xu, W., & Liu, R. (2024). A Bibliometric Approach and Meta-Analysis of Effects of Automatic Speech Recognition on second Language learning. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 19(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijwltt.349959
McCrudden, M. T., & McTigue, E. M. (2018). Implementing integration in an explanatory sequential mixed methods study of belief bias about climate change with high school students. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(3), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818762576
Mustamir, M. (2024). Indonesian EFL learners and speaking anxiety: Insights from a meta-synthetic analysis. English Review Journal of English Education, 12(2), 509–518. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i2.9950
Ngo, T. T., Chen, H. H., & Lai, K. K. (2023). The effectiveness of automatic speech recognition in ESL/EFL pronunciation: A meta-analysis. ReCALL, 36(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344023000113
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Purnami, N. I. a. O., & Widiadnya, N. I. G. N. B. Y. (2024). Speaking Confidently: How Project-Based Learning Can Improve Student Communication. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 12(2), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v12i2.86587
Qassrawi, N. R. M., ElMashharawi, N. A., Itmeizeh, N. M., & Tamimi, N. M. H. M. (2024). AI-Powered Applications for improving EFL students’ speaking proficiency in higher Education. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(5), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i5.6966
Radhiyya, F. P., Nasution, D. K., & Ginting, P. (2025). Exploring AI Gliglish to enhance English speaking skills among secondary school students in Thailand: A classroom action research study on confidence and proficiency. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(2), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i2.750
Roberts, R. (2020). Qualitative Interview Questions: Guidance for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4640
Shazly, R. E. (2021). Effects of artificial intelligence on English speaking anxiety and speaking performance: A case study. Expert Systems, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12667
Sirisrimangkorn, L. (2021). Improving EFL Undergraduate learners’ speaking skills through Project-Based Learning using Presentation. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 12(3), 65. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.3.p.65
Suryani, L., & Argawati, N. O. (2023). Teaching speaking through project-based learning with ICT. Indonesian EFL Journal, 9(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v9i1.7134
Trinh, N. B., & Pham, D. T. T. (2021). Challenges in Speaking Classrooms among Non-English Majors. Vietnam Journal of Education (Online)/Vietnam Journal of Education/GiáO DụC, 5(2), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2021.52
Tunarosa, A., & Glynn, M. A. (2016). Strategies of Integration in Mixed Methods research. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116637197
Turner, S. F., Cardinal, L. B., & Burton, R. M. (2015). Research design for mixed methods. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115610808
Van Ha, X., Nguyen, L. T., & Hung, B. P. (2021). Oral corrective feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms: A teaching and learning perspective. Heliyon, 7(7), e07550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07550
Wallwey, C., & Kajfez, R. L. (2023). Quantitative research artifacts as qualitative data collection techniques in a mixed methods research study. Methods in Psychology, 8, 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2023.100115
Wind, S. A. (2019). Do raters use rating scale categories consistently across analytic rubric domains in writing assessment? Assessing Writing, 43, 100416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.100416
Wood, D. (2016). Willingness to communicate and second language speech fluency: An idiodynamic investigation. System, 60, 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.003
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhang, C., Meng, Y., & Ma, X. (2024). Artificial intelligence in EFL speaking: Impact on enjoyment, anxiety, and willingness to communicate. System, 121, 103259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103259
Zhang, X. (2019). Foreign Language Anxiety and Foreign Language Performance: A Meta‐Analysis. Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 763–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12590
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ari Fajria Novari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with VELES agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citations of published work.
VELES is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
